Cover not available

In:Approaches to Hungarian: Volume 14: Papers from the 2013 Piliscsaba Conference
Edited by Katalin É. Kiss, Balázs Surányi and Éva Dékány
[Approaches to Hungarian 14] 2015
► pp. 209–244

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

The Predicationality Hypothesis

The case of Hungarian and German

Published online: 3 June 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/atoh.14.09mol
Cataphoric propositional pronoun insertion (CPPI) in complex sentences is subject to language-specific restrictions. In Hungarian, the insertion of the cataphoric propositional pronoun azt is possible in complex sentences with assertive matrix verbs (‘say’), but not with factives (‘regret’), while German displays a mirror pattern.
In our strictly modular theoretical framework we argue that CPPI is dependent on the syntactic type and the realization of Spec-CP in the embedded clause. In accordance with Chomsky (2008), we assume that the derivation of Spec-CP results from the instantiation of the edge-feature (EF) in C.
Narrow Syntax is, however, only responsible for the actual derivation of Spec-CP, not for the interpretational effects of this position. The discourse-semantic content of Spec-CP can vary among different languages. In Hungarian the EF is associated with the predicational status of the embedded clause, and in German it is associated with the clause’s non-predicational status (the Predicationality Hypothesis).
References (57)
References
Abbott, Barbara. 2000. Presuppositions as nonassertions. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1419–1437. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Axel, Katrin & Anke Holler & Helena Trompelt. 2011. Correlative Es vs. Das in German: An empirical perspective. Handout of the talk presented at the workshop Inner-sentential propositional pro-forms: Syntactic properties and interpretative effects, Annual Conference of the DGfS 33, Göttingen, February 24, 2011.
(forthc.) Correlative Es vs. Das in German: An empirical perspective. In Kerstin Schwabe & André Meinunger & Werner Frey (eds.), Inner-sentential propositional pro-forms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bennis, Hans. 1987. Gaps and dummies. Dordrecht: Foris Publications. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bentzen, Kristine. 2011. The status of embedded V-Neg word order. Talk given at the workshop Main/embedded clause asymmetries in the Scandinavian languages , Lund University, April 15, 2011.
Bentzen, Kristine & Gunnar Hrafn Hrafnbjargarson & Thorbjörg Hróarsdottír & Anna-Lena Wiklund. 2007. The Tromsø guide to the Force behind V2. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 79, 93–118.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brandtler, Johan. 2012. The evaluablity hypothesis. The syntax, semantics, and pragmatics of polarity item licensing in Swedish. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company [Linguistics Today 183]. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brandtler, Johan & Valéria Molnár. 2011. Rethinking clausal asymmetries. The case of Swedish and Hungarian. Handout of the talk presented at the workshop Inner-sentential propositional pro-forms: syntactic properties and interpretative effects, Annual Conference of the DGfS 33, February 23-25, Göttingen.
(forthc.). Rethinking clausal symmetries: Propositional pronoun insertion in Hungarian. In Kerstin Schwabe & André Meinunger & Werner Frey (eds.), Inner-sentential propositional pro-forms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Breindl, Eva. 1989. Präpositionalobjekte und Präpositionalobjektsätze im Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna. 1990. Impersonal constructions and sentential aguments in German. Padova: Unipress.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. The Minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. On phases. In Robert Freidin & Carlos P. Otero & Maria Louisa Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, 133–166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Collins, Peter. 1994. Extraposition in English. Functions of Language 1.1: 7–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coppock, Elisabeth & David I. Beaver. 2013. Principles of the exclusive muddle. Journal of Semantics 30, 2013: 1–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culicover, Peter W. & Michael S. Rochemont. 1990. Extraposition and the complement principle. Linguistic Inquiry 21.1: 23–47.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Cuba, Carlos & Barbara Ürögdi. 2009. Eliminating factivity from syntax: Sentential complements in Hungarian. In Marcel den Dikken & Robert M. Vago (eds.), Approaches to Hungarian: Volume 11: Papers from the 2007 New York Conference, 29–64. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Engdahl, Elisabeth. 2011. Johan Brandtler, The evaluability hypothesis. The syntax and semantics of polarity item licensing in Swedish. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 34 (1): 61–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Engel, Ulrich. 2004. Deutsche Grammatik. München: Iudicium.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 1973. On the nature of island constraints. MIT dissertation.
É. Kiss, Katalin. 2006. Focusing as predication. In Valéria Molnár & Susanne Winkler (eds.), The Architecture of focus, 169–196. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frey, Werner. 2011. On the ‘nominal’ character of clauses associated with a pronominal. Ms., ZAS, Berlin.
Giannakidou, Anastasia. 1998. Polarity sensitivity as a (non)veridical dependency. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (Linguistik Aktuell 23). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 2006. Conditionals, factives and the left periphery. Lingua 116: 1651–1669. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Operator movement and topicalization in adverbial clauses. Folia Linguistica 41: 279–325. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. The syntax of adverbial clauses and the licensing of main clause phenomena. Truncation or intervention. Talk given at GLOW, Newcastle, March 26, 2008.
Heycock, Caroline. 2006. Embedded root phenomena. In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, vol. II, 174–209. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hinzen, Wolfram & Michelle Sheehan. 2011. Moving towards the edge: The grammar of reference. Linguistic Analysis, 37 (3-4): 405–458.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holler, Anke. 2013. Reanalyzing German correlative es . In Stefan Müller (ed.), Proceedings of the 20th international conference on head-driven phrase structure grammar, 90–109. Freie Universität Berlin: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan. 1975. On assertive predicates. In John P. Kimball (ed.), Syntax and semantics, volume 4, 91–124. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan & Sandra Thompson. 1973. On the applicability of root transformations. Linguistic Inguiry 4: 465–497.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horváth, Júlia. 1997. The status of wh-expletives and the partial wh-movement construction in Hungarian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15: 509–572. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kallulli, Dalina. 2006. Triggering factivity: Prosodic evidence for syntactic structure. In Donald Baumer, David Montero & Michael Scanlon (eds.), Proceedings of the 25th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 211–219. Sommerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kenesei, István. 1992. Az alárendelt mondatok szerkezete. [The structure of embedded sentences.] In Ferenc Kiefer (ed.), Strukturális magyar nyelvtan 1. Mondattan. [A structural grammar of Hungarian 1. Syntax.] 529–713. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. Subordinate clauses . In Ferenc Kiefer & Katalin É. Kiss (eds.), The syntactic structure of Hungarian. 275–354. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, Jong-Bok & Ivan A. Sag. 2008. Variations in English object extraposition. In Proceedings of the 41st regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society , vol. 41, No. 1, 251–265.
Kiparsky, Paul & Carol Kiparsky. 1970. Fact. In Manfred Bierwisch & Karl Erich Heidolph (eds.), Progress in linguistics, 313–341. The Hague: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lipták, Anikó. 1998. A magyar fókuszemelések egy minimalista elemzése. [A minimalist analysis of the Hungarian focus raisings.] In László Büki & Miklós Maleczki (eds.), A mai magyar nyelv leírásának újabb módszerei [Recent methods of the description of Modern Hungarian], vol. III, 93–116, Szeged: JATE.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Molnár, Valéria & Susanne Winkler. 2010. Edges and gaps: Contrast at the interfaces. Lingua 120: 1392–1415. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, Gereon. 1996. On extraction and successive cyclicity. In Uli Lutz & Jürgen Pafel (eds.), On extraction and extraposition in German, 213–244. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Platzack, Christer. 2008. The edge-feature on C. Manuscript. Lund University, October 2008.
Postal, Paul M. & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 1988. Expletive noun phrases in subcategorized positions. Linguistic Inquiry 19 (4): 635–670.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pütz, Herbert. 1975. Über die Syntax der Pronominalform es im modernen Deutsch. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1986. Über die Syntax der Pronominalform es im modernen Deutsch. 2nd edition. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sandberg, Bengt. 1998. Zum es bei transitiven Verben vor satzförmigem Akkusativobjekt. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simons, Mandy. 2006. Presupposition without common ground. Manuscript, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh. Avaliable at: [URL].
. 2007. Observations on embedding verbs, evidentiality, and presupposition. Lingua 117:6: 1034–1056. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sonnenberg, Bernhard. 1992. Korrelate im Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sternefeld, Wolfgang. 2006. Syntax. Eine morphologisch motivierte generative Beschreibung des Deutschen. Tübingen: Stauffenberg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stroik, Thomas S. 1996. Extraposition and expletive-movement: A minimalist account. Lingua: International Review of General Linguistics 99 (4): 237–251. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sudhoff, Stefan. 2003. Argumentsätze und es-Korrelate – zur syntaktischen Struktur von Nebensatzeinbettungen im Deutschen. Berlin: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(forthc.). Correlates of object clauses in German and Dutch. In Kerstin Schwabe & André Meinunger & Werner Frey (eds.), Inner-sentential propositional pro-forms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Vikner, Sten. 1995. Verb movement and expletive subjects in the Germanic languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wiklund, Anna-Lena & Kristin Bentzen & Gunnar Hrafn Hrafnbjargarson & Thorbjörg Hróarsdottir. 2009. On the distribution and illocution of V2 in Scandinavian that-clauses. Lingua 119: 1914–1938. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zifonun, Gisela. 1995. Minimalia grammaticalia: das nicht-phorische es als Prüfstein grammatischer Theoriebildung. Deutsche Sprache 23: 39–60.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Ilse. 1993. Zur Syntax und Semantik der Satzeinbettung. In Inger Rosengren (ed.), Satz und Illokution, Band 2: 231–251. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Abrusán, Márta
2025. Variations on factivity in Hungarian. Journal of Uralic Linguistics 4:1 ► pp. 4 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue