Cover not available

Article published In: The Agenda Setting Journal
Vol. 5:2 (2021) ► pp.292–313

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required
Conference papers

Legislative agenda-setting power of social media

#BlackLivesMatter and the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act of 2020

 | Boston University
 | Boston University
Published online: 1 February 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/asj.21006.upa
Abstract
In an effort to understand the legislative agenda setting impacts of social media content, the present study analyzes political discourse on Twitter regarding the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act. Using a Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topic model to dissect the Twitter conversation aimed at Representative Karen Bass, the sponsor of the H.R.7120, in the weeks leading up to the bill’s filing, our analysis of nearly 68,000 tweets posted in the days before the bill’s filing reveals that constituents strongly urged the Representative to work on legislation targeted on police reform – offering evidence of how constituents demanded, and drove, legislative action. Considering our findings, we argue that there is considerable potential for social media to serve as an amplifier of social issues and concerns among constituents. Through this process, we posit that social media can prove to be a vital catalyst in social justice reform.
Article outline
  • Literature review
    • Agenda-setting theory: Seminal work to social media extensions
      • First and second level effects
      • Agenda-setting effects of social media
      • Media coverage and legislative agenda-setting
    • Media Amplification Cycle
    • Theoretical contribution
  • Method
    • Data collection
    • Data analysis
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • References
References (31)
References
Barberá, P., Casas, A., Nagler, J., Egan, P. J., Bonneau, R., Jost, J. T., & Tucker, J. A. (2019). Who leads? Who follows? Measuring issue attention and agenda setting by legislators and the mass public using social media data. American Political Science Review, 113(4), 883–901. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bastani, K., Namavari, H., & Shaffer, J. (2019). Latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) for topic modeling of the CFPB consumer complaints. Expert Systems with Applications, 1271, 256–271. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carney, N. (2016). All lives matter, but so does race: Black lives matter and the evolving role of social media. Humanity & Society, 40(2), 180–199. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chong, M. (2019). Connective Power of the Twitter Networks: Discovering the Reverse Agenda-Setting Effects of Hashtag Activism Through Topic Modeling. 82nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 629–630. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conway, B. A., Kenski, K., & Wang, D. (2015). The rise of Twitter in the political campaign: Searching for intermedia agenda-setting effects in the presidential primary. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(4), 363–380. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Enli, G., & Simonsen, C. (2017). ‘Social media logic’ meets professional norms: Twitter hashtags usage by journalists and politicians. Information, Communication & Society, Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Enjolras, B., Steen-Johnsen, K., & Wollebaek, D. (2013). Social media and mobilization to offline demonstrations: Transcending participatory divides?. New Media & Society, 15(6), 890–908. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, H. K., Cordova, V., & Sipole, S. (2014). Twitter style: An analysis of how house candidates used Twitter in their 2012 campaigns. Political Science & Politics, 47(2), 454. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feezell, J. T. (2018). Agenda setting through social media: The importance of incidental news exposure and social filtering in the digital era. Political Research Quarterly, 71(2), 482–494. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Freelon, D., McIlwain, C. D., & Clark, M. (2016). Beyond the hashtags:# Ferguson,# Blacklivesmatter, and the online struggle for offline justice. Center for Media & Social Impact, American University, Forthcoming. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gans, H. J. (1979). Deciding what’s news: A study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News. Newsweek, and Time. New York: Pantheon, 2–3.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gervais, B. T., Evans, H. K., & Russell, A. (2020). Fear and loathing on Twitter: Exploring negative rhetoric in tweets during the 2018 midterm election. In The Roads to Congress 2018 (pp. 31–52). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Golan, G., & Wanta, W. (2001). Second-level agenda setting in the New Hampshire primary: A comparison of coverage in three newspapers and public perceptions of candidates. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 78(2), 247–259. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guo, L., & Vargo, C. (2015). The power of message networks: A big-data analysis of the network agenda setting model and issue ownership. Mass Communication and Society, 18(5), 557–576. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harder, R. A., Sevenans, J., & Van Aelst, P. (2017). Intermedia agenda setting in the social media age: How traditional players dominate the news agenda in election times. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 22(3), 275–293. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hemphill, L., Russell, A., & Schöpke-Gonzalez, A. M. (2020). What Drives US Congressional Members’ Policy Attention on Twitter?. Policy & Internet.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kilgo, D. K., & Harlow, S. (2019). Protests, media coverage, and a hierarchy of social struggle. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 24(4), 508–530. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lopez-Escobar, E., Llamas, J. P., & McCombs, M. (1998). Agenda setting and community consensus: First and second level effects. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 10(4), 335–348. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nair, P., & Sharma, S. (2017). Reverse agenda-setting: Politics in the time of facebook. Mainstream Weekly, 331.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Park, C. (2013). Does Twitter motivate involvement in politics? Tweeting, opinion leadership, and political engagement. Computers in Human Behavior. 29(4), 1641–1648. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. (2018). Public attitudes toward political engagement on social media. Retrieved from [URL]
. (2019). State of the news media methodology. Retrieved from [URL]
Russell, A. (2018). The politics of prioritization: Senators’ attention in 140 characters. In The Forum (Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 331–356). De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schradie, J. (2019). The revolution that wasn’t: How digital activism favors conservatives. Harvard University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tan, Y., & Weaver, D. H. (2009). Local media, public opinion, and state legislative policies: Agenda setting at the state level. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 14(4), 454–476. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Valenzuela, S. (2013). Unpacking the use of social media for protest behavior: The roles of information, opinion expression, and activism. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(7), 920–942. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vliegenthart, R., & Walgrave, S. (2011). When the media matter for politics: Partisan moderators of the mass media’s agenda-setting influence on parliament in Belgium. Party Politics, 17(3), 321–342. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walgrave, S., & Vliegenthart, R. (2012). The complex agenda-setting power of protest: Demonstrations, media, parliament, government, and legislation in Belgium, 1993–2000. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 17(2), 129–156. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., Wells, C., Wang, S., & Rohe, K. (2018). Attention and amplification in the hybrid media system: The composition and activity of Donald Trump’s Twitter following during the 2016 presidential election. New Media & Society, 20(9), 3161–3182. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Kurumathur, Shalini Kapali, Paras Bhatt, Rohit Valecha, Govind Hariharan & H. Raghav Rao
2025. Examination of Polarization in Social Media in Aggressor-Oriented and Victim-Oriented Discourse Following Vigilantism. Information Systems Frontiers 27:4 ► pp. 1393 ff. DOI logo
Wright, James E., Dongfang Gaozhao & Brittany Houston
2024. Body‐worn cameras and representation: What matters when evaluating police use of force?. Public Administration Review 84:6 ► pp. 1117 ff. DOI logo
Zhou, Qingqing & Tianyang Guan
2024. Detecting dynamic interaction of multiple subjects in policy information communication in China. The Electronic Library 42:6 ► pp. 1017 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue