Cover not available

Article published In: The Agenda Setting Journal
Vol. 4:2 (2020) ► pp.219–240

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Deepening the concept of  ‘compelling arguments’

Linking substantive and affective dimensions of attributes in assessing the effects of climate change news on public opinion

ORCiD logo with link | University of Kansas
 | University of Texas at Austin |
 | University of Kentucky |
 | University of Nevada, Reno |
Published online: 2 September 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/asj.19009.vu
Abstract
This study examines the effects of both the substantive and affective dimensions of issue attributes in the news coverage of climate change on the public’s perception of the importance of this environmental issue. Results from our analysis show that the four affective dimensions (e.g., positive and negative emotions, anger, and sadness) of the three attributes (e.g., existence, effects, and solutions) exerted strong influence on public issue priority. This study extends the concept of compelling arguments in agenda setting research by suggesting that compelling arguments effects are not solely dependent on substantive attributes. Their affective dimensions are influential, as well.
Article outline
  • Literature Review
    • Climate change and the news media
    • Theoretical Background
  • Research Questions & Hypotheses
  • Methods
    • Data Sources
    • Measurement
    • Independent Variables
    • Dependent Variable
    • Analysis
  • Results
    • Demographics
    • News Media Data
  • Discussion & Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (51)
References
Anderson, A. (2009). Media, politics and climate change: Towards a new research agenda. Sociology Compass, 3(2), 166–182. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ardèvol-Abreu, A., Saldaña, M. & McCombs, M. (2013). Agenda-setting in the beginning of the 1979 oil crisis: compelling arguments and public concern. Paper presented to the AEJMC Annual Conference in Washington, D.C.
Arlt, D., Hoppe, I., & Wolling, J. (2011). Climate change and media usage: Effects on problem awareness and behavioural intentions. International Communication Gazette, 731, 45–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boykoff, M. T. (2011). Who speaks for the climate?: Making sense of media reporting on climate change. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boykoff, M. T., & Boykoff, J. M. (2004). Balance as bias: global warming and the US prestige press. Global Environmental Change, 14(2), 125–136. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boykoff, M. T., & Roberts, T. J. (2007). Media coverage of climate change: Current trends, strengths, weaknesses. Human Development Report, New York, NY: United Nations.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brulle, R. J., Carmichael, J., & Jenkins, J. C. (2012). Shifting public opinion on climate change: An empirical assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the US, 2002–2010. Climatic Change, 1141, 169–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chambers, J. M., Mallows, C. L., & Stuck, B. W. (1976). A method for simulating stable random variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(354), 340–344. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coppersmith, G. A., Harman, C. T., & Dredze, M. H. (2014, June). Measuring post-traumatic stress disorder in Twitter. Presented at the International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Ann Arbor, MI.
Craft, S., & Wanta, W. (2004). US public concerns in the aftermath of 9–11: A test of second level agenda-setting. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 161, 456–463. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Vreese, C., & Boomgaarden, H. (2003). Valenced news frames and public support for the EU. Communications, 28(4), 361–381. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DiSogra, C. & Callegaro, M. (2009). Computing response rate for probability-based web panels. In JSM Proceedings, Survey Research Method Section. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association, 5309–5320. Retrieved from May 15, 2020 from: [URL]
Dunlap, R. E., McCright, A. M., & Yarosh, J. H. (2016). The political divide on climate change: Partisan polarization widens in the US. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 58(5), 4–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Entman, R. (1993). Framing: Toward a clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ghanem, S. (1997). Filling in the tapestry: The second level of agenda setting. In Maxwell E. McCombs, D. L. Shaw, & D. H. Weaver (Eds.), Communication and Democracy: Exploring the Intellectual Frontiers in Agenda-setting Theory (pp. 3–14). Malden, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guo, L., & McCombs, M. (2015). The power of information networks: New directions for agenda setting. New York, NY: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guo, L., Vu, H. T., & McCombs, M. (2012). An expanded perspective on agenda-Setting effects: Exploring the third level of agenda setting. Revista de Comunicación, 111, 51–68.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jasperson, A. E., Shah, D. V., Watts, M., Faber, R. J., & Fan, D. P. (1998). Framing and the public agenda: Media effects on the importance of the federal budget deficit. Political Communication, 15(2), 205–224. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kahn, J. H., Tobin, R. M., Massey, A. E., & Anderson, J. A. (2007). Measuring emotional expression with the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count. The American Journal of Psychology, 120(2), 263–286. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, K., & McCombs, M. (2007). News story descriptions and the public’s opinions of political candidates. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 84(2), 299–314. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, G. (2010). Who let priming out? Analysis of first- and second-level agenda setting effects on priming. International Communication Gazette, 72(8), 759–776. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, T. M., Markowitz, E. M., Howe, P. D., Ko, C. Y., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2015). Predictors of public climate change awareness and risk perception around the world. Nature Climate Change, 5(11), 1014–1020. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leiserowitz, A. A. (2005). American risk perceptions: Is climate change dangerous? Risk Analysis, 25(6), 1433–1442. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York, NY: Harpers & Row.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liu, X., Lindquist, E., & Vedlitz, A. (2011). Explaining media and congressional attention to global climate change, 1969–2005: An empirical test of agenda-setting theory, Political Research Quarterly, 64(2), 405–419. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liu, X., Vedlitz, A., & Alston, L. (2008). Regional news portrayals of global warming and climate change. Environmental Science & Policy, 11(5), 379–393. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lopez-Escobar, E., Llamas, J. P., McCombs, M., & Lennon, F. R. (1998). Two levels of agenda setting among advertising and news in the 1995 Spanish elections. Political Communication, 15(2), 225–238. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCombs, M. E. (2013). Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCombs, M. E., Lopez-Escobar, E., & Llamas, J. P. (2000). Setting the agenda of attributes in the 1996 Spanish general election. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 77–92. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1993). The evolution of agenda-setting research: Twenty-five years in the marketplace of ideas. Journal of Communication, 43(2), 58–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2011). The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001–2010. The Sociological Quarterly, 52(2), 155–194. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Myers, T. A., Nisbet, M. C., Maibach, E. W., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2012). A public health frame arouses hopeful emotions about climate change. Climatic Change, 113(3–4), 1105–1112. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pam, N. (April, 2013a). Valence. Retrieved on July 4, 2019 from: [URL]
(April, 2013b). Affect. Retrieved on July 4, 2019 from: [URL]
Pennebaker, J. W., Booth, R. J., Boyd, R. L., & Francis, M. E. (2015). Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: LIWC 2015. Austin, TX: Pennebaker Conglomerates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pennebaker, J. W., Slatcher, R. B., & Chung, C. K. (2005). Linguistic markers of psychological state through media interviews: John Kerry and John Edwards in 2004, Al Gore in 2000. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 5(1), 197–204. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saldaña, M. (2017). Attribute agenda setting and information overload. The Agenda Setting Journal, 1(1), 23–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saldaña, M., & Ardèvol-Abreu, A. (2015). From compelling arguments to compelling associations: Diagonal effects at the third level of agenda setting. In The Power of Information Networks: New Directions for Agenda Setting. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saldaña, M., Ardèvol-Abreu, A. & Guo, L. (2013). Compelling associations for understanding ‘the pictures in our heads’: A network agenda-setting study. Paper presented to MAPOR Annual Conference in Chicago, IL.
Saldaña, M., Ardèvol-Abreu, A., Guo, L., & McCombs, M. (2014, September). Compelling associations for addressing drug abuse and ‘war on drugs’ in the U.S.: Public opinion and agenda-setting effects. Presented at the World Association for Public Opinion Research (WAPOR) Annual Conference, Nice, France.
Sampei, Y., & Aoyagi-Usui, M. (2009). Mass-media coverage, its influence on public awareness of climate-change issues, and implications for Japan’s national campaign to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Global Environmental Change, 19(2), 203–212. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schäfer, M. S., & Schlichting, I. (2014). Media representations of climate change: A meta-analysis of the research field. Environmental Communication, 8(2), 142–160. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stieglitz, S., & Dang-Xuan, L. (2012). Political communication and influence through microblogging: An empirical analysis of sentiment in Twitter messages and retweet behavior. In the 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, (3500–3509). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(1), 24–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tewksbury, D., Jones, J., Peske, M. W., Raymond, A., & Vig, W. (2000). The interaction of news and advocate frames: Manipulating audience perceptions of a local public policy issue. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(4), 804–829. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vu, H. T. (2015). Partisan media and their climate change agenda-setting effects on partisan publics: Examining the compelling arguments concept in the age of polarization. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vu, H. T., Jiang, L., Chacón, L. M. C., Riedl, M. J., Tran, D. V., & Bobkowski, P. S. (2018). What influences media effects on public perception? A cross-national study of comparative agenda setting. International Communication Gazette, 81(6–8), 580–601. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wanta, W., Golan, G., & Lee, C. (2004). Agenda setting and international news: Media influence on public perceptions of foreign nations. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81(2), 364–377. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watt, J. H., Mazza, M., & Snyder, L. (1993). Agenda-setting effects of television news coverage and the effects decay curve. Communication Research, 20(3), 408–435. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weber, E. U. (2010). What shapes perceptions of climate change? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(3), 332–342. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Zheng, Jingwei, Ying Roselyn Du & Miao Xu
2025. “China threat” agenda in American media and public perception of China: A large-scale content analysis from 1999 to 2019. International Communication Gazette 87:6 ► pp. 539 ff. DOI logo
Illia, Laura, Stelios Zyglidopoulos & Philemon Bantimaroudis
2024. Staging the Lie: The Impact of Framing and Content on the Visibility of Fake Business News. Business & Society DOI logo
Shaughnessy, Brittany, Osama Albishri, Phillip Arceneaux, Nader Dagher & Spiro Kiousis
2023. Morality on the ballot: strategic issue salience and affective moral intuitions in the 2020 US presidential election. Journal of Communication Management 27:4 ► pp. 582 ff. DOI logo
Yousaf, Muhammad, Zhengrong Hu & Syed Hassan Raza
2023. News Media Exposure and Community Consensus on Terrorism in a Developing Country: First and Second Level Agenda-Setting Effects. Media Watch 14:1 ► pp. 33 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue