Cover not available

Article published In: Mass Media Effects and the Political Agenda: Assessing its Scope and Conditions
Edited by Ana Maria Belchior, Peter Van Aelst, José Santana-Pereira and Patrick Merle
[The Agenda Setting Journal 4:1] 2020
► pp. 17–42

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Media, public opinion and parliamentary agendas’ effect in political parties’ agenda-setting

 | ISCTE-IUL, Instituto Universitário de Lisboa
Published online: 10 April 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/asj.19008.bel
Abstract
Why do parties pay more attention to some policy issues than to others? To what extent does policy attention conveyed by the media, public opinion, and parliament explain party agenda-setting? And, more specifically, to what extent does the media agenda influence other agenda effects? This paper addresses these questions in an original manner by analyzing the influence of these three agendas – media, public opinion, and parliament – in party manifesto elaboration. The analysis relies on an extensive database of the Portuguese Policy Agendas Project that includes media attention, voter preferences, parliamentary questions and pledges in manifestos, between 1995 and 2015. Our findings show that the media agenda is the most influential in party manifesto elaboration, and that the other agendas have a stronger effect when the media also give attention to the issue. This depends, however, on the political party being in cabinet or in opposition, as well as on the economic context. These findings have important implications for party competition literature.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature and hypotheses
    • Issue attention in party manifestos
    • Media agenda
    • Public opinion agenda
    • Parliamentary agenda
    • Comparing political agenda effects in manifesto issue attention
    • Political parties as a contingent factor of media effect
    • The economic context as a contingent factor of media effect
  • 3.Data and methods
    • 3.1Data sources
    • 3.2Modeling the influence of the media, the public and parliamentary agendas in party manifesto elaboration
  • 4.Policy attention in Portugal: Comparing agendas
  • 5.Analyzing the influence of the media, public opinion and parliamentary agendas in party manifesto elaboration
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
References (51)
References
Adams, J., Haupt, A., & Stoll, H. (2009). What moves parties? The role of public opinion and global economic conditions in Western Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 42(5), 611–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Artés, J. (2013). Do Spanish politicians keep their election promises? Party Politics, 19(1), 143–158. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bara, J. (2005). A question of trust: Implementing party manifestos. Parliamentary Affairs, 581, 585–599. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). The 2006 manifestos: a sense of déjà vu. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 16(3), 265–281. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baumgartner, F., & Jones, B. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baumgartner, F.; Jones, B., & Wilkerson, J. (2011). Comparative studies of policy dynamics, Comparative Political Studies, 44(8), 947–972. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bonafont, L. C. & Baumgartner, F. (2013). Newspaper attention and policy activities in Spain. Journal of Public Policy, 33(1), 65–88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borghetto, E. & Belchior, A. M. (2020). Party Manifestos, Opposition and Media as Determinants of the Cabinet Agenda. Political Studies (online first, at: )Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bosco, A., & Verney, S. (2012). Electoral epidemic: The political cost of economic crisis in Southern Europe, 2010–11. South European Society and Politics, 17(2), 129–154. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Budge, I., & Farlie, D. (1983). Explaining and predicting elections: Issue effects and party strategies in twenty-three democracies. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Budge, I., Robertson, D., & Hearl, D. (Eds) (1987). Ideology, strategy, and party change in 19 democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Däubler, T. (2012). The preparation and use of election manifestos: Learning from the Irish case. Irish Political Studies, 27(1), 51–70. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dolezal, M.; Ennser-Jedenastik, L.; Müller, W. C. & Winkler, A. K. (2012). The life cycle of party manifestos: The Austrian case. West European Politics, 35(4), 869–895. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dolezal, M.; Ennser-Jedenastik, L.; Müller, W. C.; Praprotnik, K. & Winkler, A. K. (2018). Beyond salience and position taking: How political parties communicate through their manifestos. Party Politics, 24(3), 240–252. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elmelund-Præstekær, C. (2011). Mapping parties’ issue agenda in different channels of campaign communication: A wild goose chase? Javnost-The Public, 18(1), 37–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Green-Pedersen, C., & Stubager, R. (2010). The political conditionality of mass media influence: When do parties follow mass media attention? British Journal of Political Science, 401, 663–677. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Green-Pedersen, C., & Mortensen, P. B. (2010). Who sets the agenda and who responds to it in the Danish parliament? A new model of issue competition and agenda-setting. European Journal of Political Research, 491, 257–281. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harmel, R. (2018). The how’s and why’s of party manifestos: Some guidance for cross-national research agenda. Party Politics, 24(3), 229–239. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hofferbert, R. I., & Budge, I. (1992). The party mandate and the Westminster model: Party programmes and government spending in Britain, 1948–1985. British Journal of Political Science, 221, 151–182. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jennings, W., & Wlezien, C. (2011). Distinguishing between most important problems and issues? Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(3), 545–555. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jones, B., & Baumgartner, F. (2004). Representation and agenda setting. The Policy Studies Journal, 32(1), 1–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). The politics of attention. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kingdon, J. W. (2003). Agendas, alternatives and public policies. 2nd edition New York: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klingemann, H.-D., Hofferbert, R. I., & Budge, I. (1994). Parties, policies and democracy. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klüver, H. & Sagarzazu, I. (2016). Setting the agenda or responding to voters? Political parties, voters and issue attention. West European Politics, 39(2), 380–398. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klüver, H., & Spoon, J.-J. (2016). Who responds? Voters, parties and issue attention. British Journal of Political Science, 46(3), 633–654. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liang, K. Y., & Zeger, S. L. (1986). Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika, 731, 13–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lobo, M. C., Pinto, A. C., & Magalhães, P. (2012). The political institutions of Portuguese democracy. In S. Royo (Ed.), Portugal in the Twenty-First Century. Lanham: Lexington Books, 23–48.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Magalhães, P. (2014). The elections of the Great Recession in Portugal: Performance voting under a blurred responsibility for the economy. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 24(2), 180–202. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maravall, J. M. (2013). Las promesas políticas. Madrid: Galaxia Gutenberg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mansbridge, J. (2003). Rethinking representation. American Political Science Review, 97(4): 515–528. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mortensen, P. B., Green-Pedersen, C., Breeman, G., Chaqués-Bonafont, L., Jennings, W., John, P., Palau, A. M., & Timmermans, A. (2011). Comparing government agendas: Executive speeches in the Netherlands, United Kingdom, and Denmark. Comparative Political Studies, 44(8), 973–1000. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Page, B., & Shapiro, R. (1983). Effects of public opinion on policy. American Political Science Review, 77(1), 175–90. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paletz, D. (1998). The media and public policy. In D. Graber, D. McQuail, & P. Norris (Eds.), The politics of news. The news of politics. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, 218–237.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Royed, T. J. (1996). Testing the Mandate Model in Britain and the United States: Evidence from the Reagan and Thatcher Eras. British Journal of Political Science, 26(1), pp.45–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schedler, A. (1998). The normative force of electoral promises. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 10(2), 191–214. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Soroka, S. (2002). Issue attributes and agenda-setting by media, the public, and policymakers in Canada. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 141, 264–285. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spoon, J.-J. & Klüver, H. (2014). Do parties respond? How electoral context influences party responsiveness. Electoral Studies, 351, 48–60. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stimson, J. A., MacKuen, M. B., & Erikson, R. S. (1995). Dynamic representation. American Political Science Review, 83(3), 543–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stokes, S. (1999). Political parties and democracy. Annual Review of Political Science, 21, 243–267. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strøm, K., & Müller, W. C. (1999). Political parties and hard choices. In: W. C. Müller, & K. Strøm (Eds.), Policy, office or votes? How political parties in Western Europe make hard decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thomson, R.; Royed, T.; Naurin, E.; Artés, J.; Costello, R.; Ennser-Jedenastik, L.; Fergunson, M.; Kostadinova, P.; Moury, C.; Pétry, F. & Praprotnik, K. (2017). The fulfillment of parties’ election pledges: A comparative study on the impact of power sharing. American Journal of Political Science, 61(3), 527–542. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vliegenthart, R., & Walgrave, S. (2010). When the media matter for politics: Partisan moderators of the mass media’s agenda-setting influence on parliament in Belgium, Party Politics, 17(3), 321–341. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Content matters: The dynamics of parliamentary questioning in Belgium and Denmark. Comparative Political Studies, 44(8), 1031–1059. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wagner, M., & Meyer, T. M. (2014). Which issues do parties emphasise? Salience strategies and party organization in multiparty systems. West European Politics, 37(5), 1019–1045. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walgrave, S., & Van Aelst, P. (2006). The contingency of the mass media’s political agenda setting power: Toward a preliminary theory. Journal of Communication, 561, 88–109. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walgrave, S., & De Swert, K. (2007). Where does issue ownership come from? From the party or from the media? Issue-party identifications in Belgium (1991–2005). Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 12(1), 37–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walgrave, S., Soroka, S., & Nuytemans, M. (2008). The mass media’s political agenda-setting power. A longitudinal analysis of media, parliament, and government in Belgium (1993 to 2000). Comparative Political Studies, 41(6), 814–836. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walgrave, S., & Lefevere, J. (2010). Do the media shape agenda preferences? An empirical study of party manifestos in Belgium (1987–2003). In K. Voltmer & S. Koch-Baumgarten (Eds.), Public policy and mass media: The interplay of mass communication and political decision making. London, Routledge, 44–64.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolfe, M., Jones, B., & Baumgartner, F. (2013). A failure to communicate: Agenda setting in media and policy studies. Political Communication, 30(2), 175–192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Arafat, S. M. Yasir, Md. Aminul Islam & Sujita Kumar Kar
2021. Mass Media and Panic Buying. In Panic Buying [SpringerBriefs in Psychology, ], ► pp. 65 ff. DOI logo
Russell, Annelise & Rebecca Eissler
2021. What’s in a name?. The Agenda Setting Journal 5:2 ► pp. 134 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue