Cover not available

Article published In: The Agenda Setting Journal
Vol. 3:2 (2019) ► pp.108–122

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Consensus without focus

Why news agenda setting expands the public agenda

 | University of Oklahoma
 | University of Oklahoma
Published online: 25 September 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/asj.18026.mei
Abstract
Generating public consensus on issue priorities is one of the most important functions of news agenda setting. However, the nature of that consensus is not well understood. Agenda setting might build a public consensus focused on a limited set of priorities, but it also has potential to build a consensus that broadens the public’s issue agenda by generating shared concerns about problems beyond the bounds of personal experience. Evidence shows that from 1968–2010, broadcast news’ agenda-setting effect tended to broaden the public agenda rather than focus it. This tendency of news agenda setting to broaden the public agenda is not affected by the news agenda’s breadth or by which issues dominate the news, although issue-level agenda setting effects may, under some circumstances, focus the public agenda. If broadcast news does not focus the public agenda, it is unlikely a focused agenda will be generated by a more fragmented media ecology.
Article outline
  • Literature review
  • Method
    • Data
    • Measures
  • Results
    • Analysis
    • RQ1: Agenda setting and public agenda diversity
    • RQ2: News agenda diversity
    • RQ3: News coverage of issues
  • Discussion
    • Limitations
    • Future directions
  • Notes
  • References
References (28)
References
Chaffee, S. H., & Wilson, D. G. (1977). Media rich, media poor: Two studies of diversity in agenda-holding. Journalism Quarterly, 54(3), 466–476. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chiang, C. (1995). Bridging and closing the gap of our society: Social function of media agenda setting. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Texas, Austin, TX.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culbertson, H. M. (1992). Measuring agenda diversity in an elastic medium: Candidate position papers. Journalism Quarterly 69(4), 938–946. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Du, Y. R., & Wong, J. (2013). Greater newspaper use increases agreement on public issues. Newspaper Research Journal, 34(3), 60–71. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Edy, J. A. & Meirick, P. C. (2018). The Fragmenting Public Agenda: Diversity and Volatility in Responses to the “Most Important Problem” Question. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(4), 661–685. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). A nation fragmented: The public agenda in the information age. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garrow, D. J. (1978). Protest at Selma: Martin Luther King Jr., and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. New Haven: CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gottfried, J. & Shearer, E. (2017). Americans’ online news use is closing in on TV news use. Pew Research Center, September 7, 2017. [URL] (accessed 19 September 2018)
Lippmann, W. (1922). Public opinion. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lopez-Escobar, E., Llamas, J. P., & McCombs, M. (1998). Agenda setting and community consensus: First and second level effects. International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 10 (4), 335–348. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCombs, M. (1997). Building consensus: The news media’s agenda-setting roles. Political Communication, 14(4), 433–443. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCombs, M., Shaw, D. L., & Weaver, D. H. (2014). New directions in agenda-setting theory and research. Mass Communication and Society, 17(6), 781–802. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCombs, M., & Zhu, J. H. (1995). Capacity, diversity, and volatility of the public agenda: Trends from 1954 to 1994. Public Opinion Quarterly, 59(4), 495–525. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neuman, W. R. (1990). The threshold of public attention. Public Opinion Quarterly, 54(2), 159–176. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peter, J., & De Vreese, C. H. (2003). Agenda-rich, agenda-poor: A cross-national comparative investigation of nominal and thematic public agenda diversity. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 15(1), 44–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prior, M. (2007). Post broadcast democracy: How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shannon, C. E. & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shaw, D. L., & Martin, S. E. (1992). The function of mass media agenda setting. Journalism Quarterly, 69(4), 902–920. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shaw, D. & Weaver, D. (2014). Media agenda-setting and audience agenda-melding. In M. E. McCombs, Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion (pp. 145–150). (2nd Ed.) Cambridge, England: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tan, Y. & Weaver, D. H. (2013). Agenda diversity and agenda setting: What are the trends over time? Journalism Studies, 14(6), 773–789. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Uscinski, J. (2012). TV news policy agenda data (dataset). Retrieved from [URL]
Uscinski, J. E. (2014). The people’s news: Media, politics, and the demands of capitalism. New York: New York University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vargo, C. J., Guo, L., McCombs, M. & Shaw, D. L. (2014). Network issue agendas on Twitter during the 2012 U.S. presidential election. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 296–316. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wanta, W. & Hu, Y. (1993). The agenda-setting effects of international news coverage: An examination of differing news frames. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 5(3), 250–264. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weaver, D., McCombs, M. & Shaw, D. L. (2004). “Agenda-Setting Research: Issues, Attributes, and Influences.” In L. L. Kaid (Ed.) Handbook of Political Communication Research (pp. 257–282), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Webster, J. G. (2014). The marketplace of attention: How audiences take shape in the digital age. Boston: The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhu, J. H. (1992). Issue competition and attention distraction: A zero-sum theory of agenda setting. Journalism Quarterly, 69(4), 825–836. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zucker, H. G. (1978). The variable nature of news media influence. In B. D. Ruben (Ed.) Communication Yearbook No. 2. New Brunswick: Transaction, pp. 225–245.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Oleskog Tryggvason, Per, Adam Shehata & Judith Möller
2025. Worlds Apart? Public Agenda Fragmentation in Sweden 1987–2021. Public Opinion Quarterly 89:1 ► pp. 74 ff. DOI logo
de Macedo Higgins Joyce, Vanessa
2024. Introduction: Independence as a New Digital Proposition in Newsrooms in South America. In Digital-Native News in South America [Palgrave Studies in Journalism and the Global South, ], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue