Article published In: The Agenda Setting Journal
Vol. 3:2 (2019) ► pp.123–138
Diffusion as a future perspective of agenda setting
Published online: 25 September 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/asj.18022.hai
https://doi.org/10.1075/asj.18022.hai
Abstract
The changing media environment has led to fragmentation of both media and audiences and thus to new flows of news items across channels and time. It has become challenging to clearly distinguish public and media agendas and their relationships. Our traditional way of counting single news items to determine an issue’s importance does not apply online. Articles are not scheduled into fixed publication cycles, they are moved, updated, or shared. Moreover, the variety of channels through which users encounter news loosens the connection between news items and their original source. We suggest “diffusion” as a concept to identify agenda-setting effects. News items are assigned different degrees of relevance by users clicking, liking, or sharing it. In turn, such relevance can affect others in assigning prominence to news items. The diffusion process results in a shared agenda which is constantly modified and updated by the entire community of online actors.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Challenges of agenda-setting studies online
- Case study
- Diffusion as a key concept
- Case study
- Conclusion
References
References (51)
Abrahamson, E. (1991). Managerial fads and fashions: The diffusion and rejection of innovations. Academy of Management Review, 161, 586–612.
Adam, S. T., Häussler, T., Schmid-Petri, H., & Weber, U. (2016). Identifying and analyzing hyperlink issue networks. In G. Vowe & P. Henn (Eds.), Political communication in the online world. Theoretical approaches and research designs (pp. 233–247).
Anderson, C. W. (2011). Between creative and quantified audiences: Web metrics and changing patterns of newswork in local US newsrooms. Journalism, 121, 550–566.
Atkinson, M. L., Lovett, J., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2014). Measuring the media agenda. Political Communication, 311, 355–380.
Bakshy, E., Rosenn, I., Marlow, C., & Adamic, L. (2012). The role of social networks in information diffusion. In A. Mille (Ed.), Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 519–528).
Beam, M. A., & Kosicki, G. M. (2014). Personalized news portals: Filtering systems and increased news exposure. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 911, 59–77.
Bennett, W. L., & Iyengar, S. (2008). A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication, 581, 707–731.
Bright, J., & Nicholls, T. (2014). The life and death of political news measuring the impact of the audience agenda using online data. Social Science Computer Review, 321, 170–181.
Brosius, H.-B., & Kepplinger, H. M. (1995). Killer and victim issues: Issue competition in the agenda-setting process of German television. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 71, 211–231.
Brosius, H.-B., & Weimann, G. (1996). Who sets the agenda? Agenda-setting as a two-step flow. Communication Research, 231, 561–580.
Deutschmann, P. J., & Danielson, W. A. (1960). Diffusion of knowledge of the major news story. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 371, 345–355.
Fletcher, R., & Nielsen, R. K. (2017). Are news audiences increasingly fragmented? A cross-national comparative analysis of cross-platform news audience fragmentation and duplication. Journal of Communication, 671, 476–498.
Guille, A., Hacid, H., Favre, C., & Zighed, D. A. (2013). Information diffusion in online social networks: A survey. SIGMOD Record, 42(2), 17–28.
Guo, L., & Vargo, C. J. (2017). Global intermedia agenda setting: A big data analysis of international news flow. Journal of Communication, 671, 499–520.
Guo, L., Vu, H. T., & McCombs, M. E. (2012). An expanded perspective on agenda-setting effects. Exploring the third level of agenda setting. Revista de Comunicación, 111, 51–68.
Haim, M., Kümpel, A. S., & Brosius, H.-B. (2018). Popularity cues in online media: A review of conceptualizations, operationalizations, and general effects. Studies in Communication and Media, 71, 186–207.
Haim, M., Weimann, G., & Brosius, H.-B. (2018). Who sets the cyber agenda? Intermedia agenda-setting online: The case of Edward Snowden’s NSA revelations. Journal of Computational Social Science, 11, 277–294.
Karnowski, V., Kümpel, A. S., Leiner, D., & Leonhard, L. (2018, May). Artikel- oder Themeneigenschaften: Wie lässt sich die Verbreitung von Nachrichtenartikeln auf sozialen Netzwerkseiten erklären? Paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the German Communication Association (DFPUK), Mannheim, Germany.
Keyling, T., & Jünger, J. (2016). Observing online content. In G. Vowe & P. Henn (Eds.), Political communication in the online world. Theoretical approaches and research designs (pp. 183–200). New York, NY: Routledge.
Keyling, T., Karnowski, V., & Leiner, D. (2013). Nachrichtendiffusion in der virtuellen MediaPolis sozialer Netzwerke: Wie sich Nachrichtenartikel über Facebook, Twitter und Google+ verbreiten. In B. Pfetsch, J. Greyer, & J. Trebbe (Eds.), MediaPolis – Kommunikation zwischen Boulevard und Parlament. Strukturen, Entwicklungen und Probleme von politischer und zivilgesellschaftlicher Öffentlichkeit (pp. 209–227). Konstanz: UVK.
King, G., Schneer, B., & White, A. (2017). How the news media activate public expression and influence national agendas. Science, 358(6364), 776–780.
Kleinnijenhuis, J., & Walter, A. S. (2014). News, discussion, and associative issue ownership: Instability at the micro level versus stability at the macro level. International Journal of Press/Politics, 191, 226–245.
Lee, J. K. (2007). The effect of the internet on homogeneity of the media agenda: A test of the fragmentation thesis. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 841, 745–760.
McCombs, M. E. (2012). Civic osmosis: The social impact of media. Comunicación y Sociedad, 25(1), 7–14.
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 361, 176–187.
McCombs, M. E., Shaw, D. L., & Weaver, D. H. (2014). New directions in agenda-setting theory and research. Mass Communication and Society, 171, 781–802.
McCombs, M., & Stroud, N. J. (2014). Psychology of agenda-setting effects. Mapping the paths of information processing. Review of Communication Research, 21, 68–93.
Meraz, S. (2011). The fight for ‘how to think’: Traditional media, social networks, and issue interpretation. Journalism, 121, 107–127.
Min, Y., Ghanem, S. I., & Evatt, D. (2007). Using a split-ballot survey to explore the robustness of the ‘MIP’ question in agenda-setting research: A methodological study. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 191, 221–236.
Napoli, P. M. (2010). Audience evolution: New technologies and the transformation of media audiences. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Neumann, R. W., Guggenheim, L., Jang, S. M., & Bae, S. Y. (2014). The dynamics of public attention: Agenda-setting theory meets big data. Journal of Communication, 641, 193–214.
Pew Research Center. (2017). How Americans encounter, recall and act upon digital news. Retrieved from [URL]
Roberts, M., Wanta, W., & Dzwo, T.-H. D. (2002). Agenda setting and issue salience online. Communication Research, 291, 452–465.
(2000). Reflections on news event diffusion research. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 771, 561–576.
Scharkow, M., & Vogelgesang, J. (2011). Measuring the public agenda using search engine queries. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 231, 104–113.
Shaw, D. L., & Colistra, R. F. (2008). Agenda melding. In L. Kaid & C. Holtz-Bacha (Eds.), Encyclopedia of political communication (p. 12). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Shaw, D. L., Hamm, B. J., & Terry, T. C. (2006). Vertical versus horizontal media: Using agenda-setting and audience agenda-melding to create public information strategies in the emerging papyrus society. Military Review, 86(6), 13–25.
Shehata, A., & Strömbäck, J. (2013). Not (yet) a new era of minimal effects: A study of agenda setting at the aggregate and individual levels. International Journal of Press/Politics, 181, 234–255.
Singer, J. B. (2014). User-generated visibility: Secondary gatekeeping in a shared media space. New Media & Society, 16(1), 55–73.
Susarla, A., Oh, J.-H., & Tan, Y. (2012). Social networks and the diffusion of user-generated content: Evidence from YouTube. Information Systems Research, 23(1), 23–41.
Tan, Y., & Weaver, D. H. (2013). Agenda diversity and agenda setting from 1956 to 2004. Journalism Studies, 141, 773–789.
Vargo, C. J., & Guo, L. (2017). Networks, big data, and intermedia agenda setting: An analysis of traditional, partisan, and emerging online U.S. news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 941, 1031–1055.
Vargo, C. J., Guo, L., McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. L. (2014). Network issue agendas on Twitter during the 2012 U.S. presidential election. Journal of Communication, 641, 296–316.
Weaver, D. H. (2007). Thoughts on agenda setting, framing, and priming. Journal of Communication, 571, 142–147.
Webster, J. G., & Ksiazek, T. B. (2012). The dynamics of audience fragmentation: Public attention in an age of digital media. Journal of Communication, 621, 39–56.
Cited by (8)
Cited by eight other publications
Chomón Serna, José María, Miguel Ángel Moreno Gallo & Mar Chicharro Merayo
Barredo Ibáñez, Daniel, Paulo Carlos López-López & Daniel Javier de la Garza Montemayor
Wang, Xin & Maurice Vergeer
Doloreux, David & Ekaterina Turkina
Cools, Hannes, Baldwin Van Gorp & Michaël Opgenhaffen
Haim, Mario, Johannes Breuer & Sebastian Stier
Su, Linsen & Xigen Li
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
