Cover not available

Article published In: Fifty years of agenda-setting research: Volume I
Edited by Chris J. Vargo
[The Agenda Setting Journal 2:2] 2018
► pp. 124–144

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Agendamelding and out-group derogation

Examining how aggregated content can be used to prove in-group membership

 | Georgia Southern University
 | Georgia Southern University
Published online: 13 November 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/asj.18017.ril
Abstract
This study is a mixed-method quantitative and qualitative content analysis that examined the overlapping presence of agendamelding theory and in-group out-group formation on the social media platform Reddit. The study looked at the top 10 posts for one month (n = 310) on the pro-Donald Trump subreddit /r/The_Donald. The results show that media choice was used to prove membership to the in-group, often by derogating the media used by the out-group. Specific patterns emerged within the derogative language as well. Links to left-wing and neutral news media sites were often commented on and criticized, while the content of the linked news article was ignored or changed. Right-wing news media sites, which were used as news sources rather than commentary, were typically posted without changes, unlike neutral news media sites, which were often posted in a mocking manner. As agendamelding suggests, participants sought to avoid dissonance by posting media to fit within the community.
Article outline
  • Review of literature
    • Agendamelding theory
    • In-group out-group formation
    • Reddit
  • Methodology
  • Results
    • Quantitative
  • Qualitative
    • Frame 1: Changed angle
    • Frame 2: Outlet talked about
    • Frame 3: Derogation as news
    • Frame 4: Outsourced derogation
    • Frame 5: Derogative meme
    • Frame 6: News as news
  • Conclusion
  • Discussion
  • References
References (40)
References
Alexa Top Sites Data (2018). Retrieved from [URL]
Appiah, O., Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Alter, S. (2013). Ingroup favoritism and outgroup derogation: Effects of news valence, character race, and recipient race on selective news reading. Journal of Communication, 63(3), 517–534. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brewer, M. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 307. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bryant, J., & Oliver, M. B. (2009). Media effects: Advances in theory and research (Third). New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Camaj, L. (2014). Need for orientation, selective exposure, and attribute agenda-setting effects. Mass Communication and Society, 17(5), 689–712. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Camaj, L., & Weaver, D. H. (2013). Need for orientation and attribute agenda-setting during a US election campaign. International Journal of Communication, 71, 1442–1463.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chang, A. (2017, May 18). We tracked the Trump scandals on right-wing news sites. Here’s how they covered it. Retrieved from [URL]
Chernov, G., Valenzuela, S., & McCombs, M. (2011). An experimental comparison of two perspectives on the concept of need for orientation in agenda-setting theory. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 88(1), 142–155. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohen, B. (1963). The press and foreign policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dewey, C. (2016, July 20). The people running this Trump fan club also promote eugenics and call Muslims ‘animals’. Retrieved from [URL]
Douglas, W., & Washburn, M. (2016, December 6). Religious zeal drives N.C. man in “Pizzagate.” Retrieved from [URL]
Eendebak, L., Boiten, M., Krouwel, A. M., & Prooijen, J. v. (2015). Fear among the extremes: how political ideology predicts negative emotions and outgroup derogation. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, (4), 485.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, III.: Row, Peterson.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Francis, N. (2018, February 24). Reddit refuses to act as The_Donald continues to attack school shooting victims, so advertisers take action. Retrieved from [URL]
Gilmour, D. (2017, May 19). 4chan and Reddit users set out to prove Seth Rich murder conspiracy. Retrieved from [URL]
Guo, L., Vu, H. T., & McCombs, M. (2012). An expanded perspective on agenda-setting effects. exploring the third level of agenda setting Una extensión de la perspectiva de los efectos de la Agenda Setting. Explorando. Revista de Comunicación, 111, 51.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Himelboim, I., McCreery, S., & Smith, M. (2013). Birds of a feather tweet together: Integrating network and content analyses to examine cross-ideology exposure on Twitter. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(2), 154–174. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kang, C. (2017, December 22). Fake news onslaught targets pizzeria as nest of child-trafficking. The New York Times. Retrieved from [URL]
Koebler, J. (2016, July 12). How r/the_donald became a melting pot of frustration and hate. Retrieved from [URL]
Lee, D. (2018, March 02). Reddit dragged into Russian propaganda row. Retrieved from [URL]
Lippmann, W. (1946). Public opinion. Transaction Publishers. Retrieved from [URL]
Martin, T. (2017, December 19). Dissecting Trump’s most rabid online following. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCombs, M. (2005). A look at agenda-setting: Past, present and future. Journalism Studies, 6(4), 543–557. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mitchell, A., Gottfried, J., Kiley, J., & Matsa, K. E. (2014, October 21). Political polarization & media habits. Retrieved from [URL]
n/a (2017, October 2). “Archive.is everything! Tweets, Facebook whatever of celebrities, news etc so when they want to delete or backtrack the internet never forgets.” Message posted to /r/The_Donald.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Noel, J. G., Wann, D. L., & Branscombe, N. R. (1995). Peripheral ingroup membership status and public negativity toward outgroups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(1), 127–137. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nichols, A. (2017, May 24). A guide to conservative publications. Retrieved from [URL]
Ohlheiser, A. (2016, November 24). Fearing yet another witch hunt, Reddit bans ‘Pizzagate’. Retrieved from [URL]
Reddit Metrics (2018). Retrieved from [URL]
Reisinger, D. (2009, January 28). Best political sites: Liberal, conservative, and nonpartisan. Retrieved from [URL]
Scheufele, D. A. (2000). Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication & Society, 3(2–3), 297–316. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9–20.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shaw, D. L., McCombs, M., Weaver, D. H., & Hamm, B. J. (1999). Individuals, groups, and geanda melding: A theory of social dissonance. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 11(1), 2. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sherif, M. (1961). Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The Robbers Cave experiment (Vol. 101, pp. 150–198). Norman, OK: University Book Exchange.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, C. & H. (2018, March 25). 71 Amazing Reddit statistics. Retrieved from [URL]
Vargo, C. J., Guo, L., McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. L. (2014). Network issue agendas on Twitter during the 2012 US presidential election. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 296–316. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vu, H. T., Guo, L., & McCombs, M. E. (2014). Exploring “the world outside and the pictures in our heads” A network agenda-setting study. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 91(4), 669–686. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wyrich, A. (2017, October 03). How Trump’s biggest fans responded before and after learning the Las Vegas shooter was white. Retrieved from [URL]
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Buturoiu, Raluca, Nicoleta Corbu & Mădălina Boțan
2023. Introduction. In Patterns of News Consumption in a High-Choice Media Environment [Springer Studies in Media and Political Communication, ], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Riley, Jeffrey K.
2022. Angry Enough to Riot: An Analysis of In-Group Membership, Misinformation, and Violent Rhetoric on TheDonald.win Between Election Day and Inauguration. Social Media + Society 8:2 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue