Cover not available

Article published In: Fifty years of agenda-setting research: Volume II
Edited by Chris J. Vargo
[The Agenda Setting Journal 3:1] 2019
► pp. 43–62

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Measuring public opinion formation

Assessing first- and second-level agenda setting through salience measures

 | Georgia Southern University
 | The University of Texas at Austin
Published online: 2 January 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/asj.18012.kow
Abstract
For the past 50 years since the seminal agenda-setting study, scholars have continued to make strides in understanding the importance mass communication plays in public opinion formation. Although scholars have measured both first- and second-level agenda setting often using open-ended response, more close-ended measures might assist in measuring the theory, adding to the rich data. This experimental study directly compared open-ended responses shown to gauge an agenda-setting effect with close-ended responses to enhance the assessment of both first- and second-level agenda setting. The findings identified close-ended scales, including news salience, social salience, personal salience, and feelings salience, that add to the precision of measuring the salience of issues and attributes, indicating we have alternative measures to gauge agenda setting.
Article outline
  • Literature review
    • Designs and measures
    • Comparative methodological research
  • Hypotheses and research questions
  • Method
    • Stimulus material
    • Open-ended responses
    • Close-ended responses
  • Results
    • Second-level agenda setting
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • References
References (22)
References
Althaus, S. L., & Tewksbury, D. (2002). Agenda setting and the ‘‘new’’ news: Patterns of issue importance among readers of the paper and online versions of the New York Times . Communication Research, 291, 180–207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benton, M., & Frazier, P. J. (1976). The agenda-setting function of the mass media at three levels of information holding. Communication Research, 31, 261–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carpentier, F. D. (2014). Agenda setting and priming effects based on information presentation: Revisiting accessibility as a mechanism explaining agenda setting and priming. Mass Communication & Society, 17(4), 531–552. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chernov, G., Valenzuela, S., & McCombs, M. (2011). An experimental comparison of two perspectives on the concept of need for orientation in agenda-setting theory. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 881, 142–155. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohen, D. (1975, August). A report on a non-election agenda setting study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism, Ottawa, Canada.
Dearing, J. W., & Rogers, E. M. (1996). Agenda-setting. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Einsiedel, E. F., Salomone, K. L., & Schneider, F. (1984). Crime: Effects of media exposure and personal experience on issue salience. Journalism Quarterly, 611, 131–136. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evatt, D., & Ghanem, S. (2001, June). Building a scale to measure ‘salience.’ Paper presented at meeting of the World Association for Public Opinion Research, Rome, Italy.
Golan, G., & Wanta, W. (2001). Second-level agenda setting in the New Hampshire primary: A comparison of coverage in three newspapers and public perceptions of candidates. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 781, 247–259. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. (1987). News that matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiousis, S., & McCombs, M. (2004). Agenda-setting effects and attitude strength: Political figures during the 1996 presidential campaign. Communication Research, 311, 36–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matthes, J. (2006). The need for orientation toward news media: Revising and validating a classic concept. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 181, 422–444. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCombs, M. (2004). Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Min, Y., Ghanem, S., & Evatt, D. (2007). Using a split-ballot survey to explore the robustness of the ‘MIP’ question in agenda-setting research: A methodological study. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 191, 221–236. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, T. (1980). America’s most important problem – a trend analysis, 1946–1976. Public Opinion Quarterly, 441, 164–180. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1985). The polls: America’s most important problems. Public Opinion Quarterly, 491, 264–274. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strömbäck, J., & Kiousis, S. (2010). A new look at agenda-setting effects – Comparing the predictive power of overall political news consumption and specific news media consumption across different media channels and media types. Journal of Communication, 601, 271–292. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stroud, N. J., & Kenski, K. (2007). From agenda setting to refusal setting: Survey non-responsive as a function of media coverage across the 2004 election cycle. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71(4), 539–559. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Takeshita, T., & Mikami, S. (1976). How did mass media influence the voters’ choice in the 1993 general election in Japan?: A study of agenda setting. Keio Communication Review, 171, 27–41.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Valenzuela, S., & McCombs, M. (2009). The agenda-setting role of the news media. In D. W. Stacks & M. B. Salwen (Eds.), An integrated approach to communication theory and research (Second Edition) (pp. 90–105). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, T. (2000). Agenda-setting online. Southwestern Mass Communication Journal, 15(2), 59–70.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weaver, D., Graber, D., McCombs, M., & Eyal, C. (1981). Media agenda setting in a presidential election: Issues, images and interest. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Arceneaux, Phillip, Osama Albishri & Spiro Kiousis
2024. How Candidates Influence Each Other in Electoral Politics: Intercandidate Agenda-Building in Florida’s 2018 Midterm Election. Journal of Political Marketing 23:4 ► pp. 353 ff. DOI logo
He, Wei, Yuan Fang, Reza Malekian & Zhixiong Li
2019. Time Series Analysis of Online Public Opinions in Colleges and Universities and its Sustainability. Sustainability 11:13 ► pp. 3546 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue