Cover not available

Article published In: The Agenda Setting Journal
Vol. 2:1 (2018) ► pp.41–63

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

One name can change many things

Influences of mentioning political candidates on network agenda-setting effects in the 2016 U.S. election

 | University of Minnesota-Twin Cities
Published online: 29 March 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/asj.17009.kim
Abstract
As an application study of the network agenda-setting model, this study examines how the media and public network agendas can differ, based on which political candidate was mentioned along with the immigration issue in news coverage and in public tweets. Through network analyses, this study shows that there were differences in the salient attributes of the immigration issue, and that the dominant narrative structure of the issue depended on which political candidate was mentioned.
Article outline
  • Network agenda-setting (NAS) model
  • Features of the network agenda: Degree centrality and cliques
    • Degree centrality: Salience of an issue or attribute
    • Cliques: Narrative structures of an issue in the NAS model
    • Twitter as a platform for observing public network agendas
    • Immigration issue during the 2016 election
  • Method
    • Data collection
    • Coding
    • Network matrix and network analysis
  • Results
    • Network agenda-setting (NAS) effects
    • Salient attributes on each network agenda
    • Cliques and narrative structures
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • References
References (34)
References
Batrinca, B., & Treleaven, P. C. (2015). Social media analytics: A survey of techniques, tools, and platforms. AI & Soc, 301, 89–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 151, 739–768. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bruns, A., & Burgess, J. E. (2011). #Ausvotes: how Twitter covered the 2010 Australian federal election. Communication, Politics and Culture, 441, 37–56.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chadwick, A. (2010). The political information cycle in a hybrid news system: The British prime minister and the “bullygate” affair. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 161, 3–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fadigas, I. S., & Pereira, H. B. B. (2013). A network approach based on cliques. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 3921, 2576–2587. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Freeman, L. C. (1978/79). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 11, 215–239. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guo, L. (2012). The application of social network analysis in agenda setting research: A methodological exploration. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 561, 616–631. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guo, L., & Vargo, C. (2015). The power of message networks: A big-data analysis of the network agenda-setting model and issue ownership. Mass Communication and Society, 181, 557–576. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jamali, M., & Abolhassani, H. (2006). Different aspects of social network analysis. In Proceedings of 2006 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (pp. 66–72). Hong Kong: IEEE. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, J., & Min, Y. (2016). An issue attention cycle analysis of network agenda-setting model: A case study of the nuclear issue in South Korea. In L. Guo & M. E. McCombs (Eds.), The power of information networks: New directions for agenda-setting (pp. 132–143). NY: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
King, G., Schneer, B., & White, A. (2017). How the news media activate public expression and influence national agendas. Science, 3581, 776–780. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., & Bracken, C. C. (2010). Practical resources for assessing and Reporting intercoder reliability in content analysis research projects. Retrieved from [URL]
McCombs, M. E., Llamas, J. P., Lopez-Escobar, E., & Rey, F. (1997). Candidate images in Spanish elections: Second-level agenda-setting effects. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 741, 703–717. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). Agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 361, 176–187. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meraz, S. (2009). Is there an elite hold? Traditional media to social media agenda setting influence in blog networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 141, 682–707. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meraz, S., & Papacharissi, Z. (2013). Networked gatekeeping and networked framing on #Egypt. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 181, 138–166. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neuman, W. R., Guggenheim, L., Jang, S. M., & Bae, S. Y. (2014). The dynamics of public attention: Agenda-setting theory meets big data. Journal of Communication, 641, 193–214. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics and structures of storytelling: Sentiment, events and mediality. Information, Communication, & Society, 191, 307–324. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parmelee, J. H., & Bichard, S. L. (2012). Politics and the Twitter revolution: How tweets influence the relationship between political leaders and the public. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peoples, S. (2016, October 31). Policy prescriptions: Trump and Clinton on immigration. The Washington Times. Retrieved March 30, 2017 from [URL]
Petrocik, J. R. (1996). Issue ownership and presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science, 401, 825–850. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pew Research Center (2016, July 7). 2016 Campaign: Strong interest, widespread dissatisfaction. Retrieved March 30, 2017 from [URL]
Shirky, C. (2011). The political power of social media: Technology, the public sphere, and political change. Foreign Affairs, 901, 28–41.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T., Sandner, P., & Welpe, I. (2010). Predicting elections with Twitter: What 140 characters reveal about political sentiment. Presented at the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media , Washington, DC.
Valverdo, M. (2016, July 15). Compare the candidates: Clinton vs. Trump on immigration. Politifact. Retrieved March 30, 2017 from [URL]
Vargo, C. J., & Guo, L. (2017). Networks, big data, and intermedia agenda setting: An analysis of traditional, partisan, and emerging online U.S. news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 941, 1031–1055. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vargo, C. J., Guo, L., & Amazeen, M. A. (2017). The agenda-setting power of fake news: Online media landscape from 2014 to 2016. New Media & Society. Advance online publication. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vargo, C. J., Guo, L., McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (2014). Network issue agendas on Twitter during the 2012 U.S. presidential election. Journal of Communication, 641, 296–316. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wallsten, K. (2007). Agenda setting and the blogosphere: An analysis of the relationship between mainstream media and political blogs. Review of policy Research, 241, 567–587. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weaver, D., McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. L. (2004). Agenda-setting research: Issues, attributes, and influences. In L. L. Kaid (Ed.), Handbook of political communication research (pp. 257–282). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
West, J. (2016, September 5). Immigration is dominating the election conversation on Twitter. The Washington Post. Retrieved March 31, 2017 from [URL]
Wu, H. D., & Guo, L. (2017). Beyond salience transmission: Linking agenda networks between media and voters. Communication Research. Advance online publication. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Duche-Pérez, Aleixandre Brian , Cintya Yadira Vera-Revilla, Anthony Rolando Medina Rivas Plata, Olger Albino Gutiérrez-Aguilar, Manuel Edmundo Hillpa-Zuñiga & Antonio Miguel Escobar Juárez
2023. Agenda Setting in Social Networks and the Media during Presidential Elections. HUMAN REVIEW. International Humanities Review / Revista Internacional De Humanidades 21:1 ► pp. 55 ff. DOI logo
Duche-Pérez, Aleixandre Brian , Cintya Yadira Vera-Revilla, Anthony Rolando Medina Rivas Plata, Olger Albino Gutiérrez-Aguilar, Manuel Edmundo Hillpa-Zuñiga & Antonio Miguel Escobar Juárez
2023. Agenda Setting in Social Networks and the Media during Presidential Elections. HUMAN REVIEW. International Humanities Review / Revista Internacional de Humanidades 21:1 ► pp. 55 ff. DOI logo
Su, Linsen & Xigen Li
2021. Perceived agenda-setting effect in international context: Impact of media coverage on American audience’s perception of China. International Communication Gazette 83:7 ► pp. 708 ff. DOI logo
Vu, Hong Tien, Hung Viet Do, Hyunjin Seo & Yuchen Liu
2020. Who Leads the Conversation on Climate Change?: A Study of a Global Network of NGOs on Twitter. Environmental Communication 14:4 ► pp. 450 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue