Article published In: The Agenda Setting Journal
Vol. 2:1 (2018) ► pp.84–102
Advancing agenda building
Exploring causal relationships
Published online: 29 March 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/asj.17008.moh
https://doi.org/10.1075/asj.17008.moh
Abstract
This study tested the three levels of agenda building using an experimental design to identify possible causal relationships. This research contributes to the study and practice of political public relations by examining the process by which an issue is created and transferred to the public. Results indicate various support for agenda building including overall issue salience and issue attribute salience. The study also tested the compelling arguments hypothesis and found strong support for attribute salience contributing to overall issue salience. These findings are important for political public relations practitioners as it demonstrates that contextual issue attributes increase issue salience for the public.
Article outline
- Literature review
- Political public relations
- Agenda setting theory
- First- and second-level agenda building
- Compelling arguments
- Third-level agenda-building
- Agenda-building outcomes: behavioral intention
- Method
- Participants
- Procedures
- Stimulus materials
- Instrumentation
- Issue salience
- Issue attribute salience (consequences and outcomes)
- Issue attribute salience (morality and motivation to take action)
- Behavioral intention
- Data analysis
- Results
- Discussion
- Limitations and future research
References
References (57)
Cheng, Z., Golan, G. J., & Kiousis, S. (2016). The second-level agenda-building function of the Xinhua News Agency: Examining the role of government-sponsored news in mediated public diplomacy. Journalism Practice, 10(6), 744–762.
D’Aprix, R. (1996). Communicating for change: Connecting the workplace with the marketplace. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Dunn, J. R., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2005). Feeling and believing: The influence of emotion on trust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(5), 736–748.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward a clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.
Foster, C., Thrasher, J., Kim, S. -H., Rose, I., Besley, J. C., & Navarro, A. (2012). Agenda building influences on the news media’s coverage of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s push to regulate tobacco, 1993–2009. Journal of Health and Human Services Administration, 351, 300–327.
Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the modal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366.
Greenest universities. (2017). BestColleges.com. Retrieved from [URL]
Guo, L., & McCombs, M. (2011, May). Network agenda setting: A third level of media effects. Paper presented at the annual conference of International Communication Association, Boston, MA.
(2016). The power of information networks: New directions for agenda setting. New York, NY: Routledge.
Guo, L., Vu, H. T., & McCombs, M. (2012). An expanded perspective on agenda-setting effects: Exploring the third level of agenda setting. Revista De Comunicación, 111, 51–68.
Hallahan, K. (1999). Seven models of framing: Implications for public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 11(3), 205–242.
Hopmann, D. N., Elmelund-Praestekaer, C., Albaek, E., Vliegenthart, R., & de Vreese, C. H. (2010). Party media agenda-setting: How parties influence election news coverage. Party Politics, 18(2), 173–191.
Hughes, A., & Dann, S. (2009). Political marketing and stakeholder engagement. Marketing Theory, 9(2), 243–256.
Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Johnson, T. J. (Ed.). (2014). Agenda setting in a 2.0 world: A tribute to Maxwell McCombs. New York: Routledge.
Kim, J-N., & Grunig, J. E. (2011). Problem solving and communicative action: A situational theory of problem solving. Journal of Communication, 611, 120–149.
Kim, J. Y., & Kiousis, S. (2012). The role of affect in agenda building for public relations: Implications for public relations outcomes. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 89(4), 657–676.
Kim, J. Y., Kiousis, S., & Molleda, J. C. (2015). Use of affect in blog communication: Trust, credibility, and authenticity. Public Relations Review, 41(4), 504–507.
Kim, K., & McCombs, M. (2007). News story descriptions and the public’s opinions of political candidates. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 84(2), 299–314.
Kim, J. Y., Xiang, Z., & Kiousis, S. (2011). Agenda building effects by 2008 presidential candidates on global media coverage and public opinion. Public Relations Review, 37(1), 109–111.
Kiousis, S., Bantimaroudis, P., & Ban, H. (1999). Candidate image attributes: Experiments on the substantive dimension of second level agenda setting. Communication Research, 26(4), 414–428.
Kiousis, S., Park, J. M., Kim, J. Y., & Go, E. (2013). Exploring the role of agenda-building efforts in media coverage and policymaking activity of healthcare reform. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 901, 1–21.
Kiousis, S., Kim, J. Y., Kochhar, S. K., Lim, H. J., Park, J. M., & Im, J. S. (2016). Agenda-building linkages between public relations and state news media during the 2010 Florida Senate Election. Public Relations Review, 42(1), 240–242.
Kiousis, S., Kim, J. Y., Ragas, M., Wheat, G., Kochhar, S., Svensson, E., & Miles, M. (2015). Exploring new frontiers of agenda building during the 2012 US presidential election pre-convention period: Examining linkages across three levels. Journalism Studies, 16(3), 363–382.
Kiousis, S., Laskin, A., & Kim, J. Y. (2011). Congressional agenda-building: Examining the influence of Congressional communications from the Speaker of the House. Public Relations Journal, 5(1), 1–14.
Kiousis, S., & McDevitt, M. (2008). Agenda setting in civic development: Effects of curricula and issue importance on youth voter turnout. Communication Research, 35(4), 481–502.
Kiousis, S., Mitrook, M., Wu, X., & Seltzer, T. (2006). First- and second-level agenda-building and agenda-setting effects: Exploring the linkages among candidate news releases, media coverage, and public opinion during the 2002 Florida gubernatorial election. Journal of Public Relations Research, 18(3), 265–285.
Kiousis, S., Popescu, C., & Mitrook, M. (2007). Understanding influence of corporate reputation: An examination of public relations efforts, media coverage, public opinion, and financial performance from an agenda-building and agenda-setting perspective. Journal of Public Relations, 191, 147–165.
Kiousis, S., Ragas, M. W., Kim, J. Y., Schweickart, T., Neil, J., & Kochhar, S. (2016). Presidential agenda building and policymaking: Examining linkages across three levels. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 10(1), 1–17.
Kiousis, S., & Shields, A. (2008). Intercandidate agenda-setting in presidential elections: Issue and attribute agendas in the 2004 campaign. Public Relations Review, 34(4), 325–330.
Knight, M. G. (1999). Getting past the impasse: Framing as a tool for public relations. Public Relations Review, 25(3), 381–398.
McCombs, M. (2005). A look at agenda-setting: Past, present and future. Journalism Studies, 6(4), 543–557.
Lang, A. (2000). The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. Journal of Communication, 50(1), 46–70.
McCombs, M. E. (1992). Explorers and surveyors: Expanding strategies for agenda-setting research. Journalism Quarterly, 691, 813–824.
McCombs, M. E., & Ghanem, S. I. (2001). Agenda setting and framing. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing Public Life (pp. 67–81). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
McCombs, M., & Reynolds, A. (2009). How the news shapes our civic agenda. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 1–16). New York: Routledge.
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). Agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 361: 176–184.
Neil, J. M., & Schweickart, T. (2014). Overbooked: Exploring UK governmental agenda building in an age of medical tourism. Paper presented at the European Public Relations Education and Research Association Conference, Brussels, Belgium.
Nuwer, R. (2014, July 22). Do students really choose colleges based on how green they are? The Guardian. Retrieved from [URL]
Price, V., Tewksbury, D., & Powers, E. (1997). Switching trains of thought: The impact of news frames on readers’ cognitive responses. Communication Research, 24(5), 481–506.
Schultz, F., Kleinnijenhuis, J., Oegema, D., Ultz, S., & Van Atteveldt, W. (2012). Strategic framing in the BP crisis: A semantic network analysis of associative frames. Public Relations Review, 38(1), 97–107.
Sheafer, T. (2007). How to evaluate it: The role of story-evaluative tone in agenda setting and priming. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 21–39.
Schweickart, T., Neil, J., Kim, J. Y., & Kiousis, S. (2016). Time-lag analysis of the agenda-building process between White House public relations and congressional policymaking activity. Journal of Communication Management, 20(4), 363–380.
Schweickart, T., & Werder, K. P. (2014). Cross-national conflict shifting: Examining corporate performance and responses in media attribution of responsibility. Paper presented at the European Public Relations Education and Research Association Conference, Brussels, Belgium.
Semetko, H. A., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2000). Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 93–109.
Shah, D. V., Domke, D., & Wackman, D. B. (2001). The effects of value-framing on political judgment and reasoning. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy Jr., & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Sheafer, T. (2007). How to evaluate it: The role of story-evaluative tone in agenda setting and priming. Journal of Communication, 571, 21–39.
Strömbäck, J., & Kiousis, S. (2011). Political public relations: Principles and applications. New York: Routledge.
Tedesco, J. C. (2005). Intercandidate agenda setting in the 2004 presidential primary. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(1), 92–113.
Valkenburg, P. M., Semetko, H. A., & de Vreese, C. H. (1999). The effects of news frames on readers’ thoughts and recall. Communication Research, 261, 550–569.
de Vreese, C. H. (2003). Framing Europe: Television news and European integration
. Amsterdam: Askant Academic Publishers.
(2005). News framing: Theory and typology. Information Design Journal + Document Design, 13(1), 48–59.
de Vreese, C. H., Peter, J., & Semetko, H. A. (2001). Framing politics at the launch of the euro: A cross-national comparative study of frames in the news. Political Communication, 18 (2), 107–122.
Wanta, W., & Mikusova, S. (2010). The agenda-setting process in international news. Central European Journal of Communication, 31, 221–36.
Weaver, D. (1984). Media agenda-setting and public opinion: Is there a link? In R. Bostrom (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 8 (pp. 680–691). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Werder, K. P., & Schweickart, T. (2013). The importance of goal compatibility in predicting the attitudes, behavioral intention, and communicative action of publics. Paper presented at the European Public Relations Education and Research Association Conference, Barcelona, Spain.
Zhang, T., Khalitova, L., Myslik, B., Kim, J., Schweickart, T., Neil, J., Carroll, C., & Kiousis, S. (2016). In the eyes of democracy: International intermedia agenda-building in 2014 Hong Kong protest. Paper presented at International Conference on Emerging Trends and Challenges of Public Relations and Strategic Communication in the Digital Era, 17 March, Hong Kong.
