Article published In: Arabic Linguistics: Online-First Articles
Quadriliteral comparatives in Arabic
Published online: 24 November 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/arli.24010.elh
https://doi.org/10.1075/arli.24010.elh
Abstract
In most dialects of Arabic the comparative (elative) seems to be derived by taking a base adjective and mapping it
to a template of the shape ʔaCCaC. A traditional constraint on the elative, noted in Wright’s A Grammar of the Arabic
Language and in Girod, Alain. (2011). Elative. In Versteegh, Kees (ed.), Encyclopedia
of Arabic language and linguistics v.
2, (12–16). Brill. [online
version], is that it cannot be formed with a root
containing four consonants nor can it incorporate affixal consonants. In this article, however, we illustrate the occurrence of
such comparatives in southern Levantine Arabic, based on the Palestinian variety spoken natively by the first author and on native
speaker consultations. We term these elatives “quadriliteral comparatives”. We argue that such comparatives are not based on an
adjective or on an underlying root, but on a corresponding dialectal verb form that usually has the prefix [ʔit-]. Their meaning
is typically evaluative rather than objective. We offer a formal analysis in the framework of Construction Morphology.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Triliteral comparatives
- 3.Quadriliteral comparatives
- 4.Analysis — construction morphology
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (27)
Bobaljik, Jonathan. (2012). Universals
in comparative morphology: Suppletion, superlatives, and the structure of words. MIT Press.
. (2017). The
construction of words. In Dancygier, Barbara (Ed.), The
Cambridge handbook of Cognitive
Linguistics (229–245). Cambridge University Press.
Davis, Stuart. (2017). Some
issues for an analysis of the templatic comparative in Arabic with a focus on the Egyptian
dialect. In Ouali, Hamid (Ed.), Perspectives
on Arabic linguistics XXIX (129–150). John Benjamins.
. (2019). Are
there transfer effects in the Arabic comparative? In Khalfaoui, Amel and Matthew Tucker (Eds.), Perspectives
on Arabic
linguistics XXX (33–51). John Benjamins.
. (2023). Word-based
vs. Root-based Templatic Morphology in Arabic and Construction Morphology. Talk presented at
the 5th Arabic Linguistics Forum, University of York, York,
UK, November 8–10.
Davis, Stuart & Tsujimura, Natsuko. (2018). Arabic
nonconcatenative morphology in Construction Morphology. In Booij, Geert (Ed.), The
construction of words: Advances in Construction
Morphology (315–339). Springer.
Girod, Alain. (2011). Elative. In Versteegh, Kees (ed.), Encyclopedia
of Arabic language and linguistics v.
2, (12–16). Brill. [online
version]
Grandi, Nicola & Körtvélyessy, Lívia. (2015). Introduction:
Why Evaluative Morphology? In Nicola Grandi & Körtvélyessy, Lívia (eds.), Edinburgh
handbook of Evaluative Morphology (3–20). Edinburgh University Press.
Grano, Thomas & Davis, Stuart. (2018). Universal
markedness in gradable adjectives revisited: The Morpho-semantics of the positive form in
Arabic. Natural Language and Linguistic
Theory, 361, 131–147.
Kamel, Mona & Hassanein, Ahmed. (1980). Yalla
ndardish sawa. Arabic Language Unit, American University in Cairo.
Mashaqba, Bassil. (2015). The
phonology and morphology of Wadi Ramm Arabic. [Doctoral
dissertation, University of Salford].
Mashaqba, Bassil, Al-Maani, Alaa, Huneety, Anas, & Al-Deaibes, Mutasim. (2023). Hypocoristics
in the Ammani-Jordanian context: A Construction Morphology perspective. Cogent Arts and
Humanities, 10(1), 1–17.
McCarthy, John. (1981). A
prosodic theory of nonconcatenative morphology. Linguistic
Inquiry, 12(3), 373–348.
McCarthy, John & Prince, Alan. (1990). Foot
and word in prosodic morphology: The Arabic broken plurals. Natural Language and Linguistic
Theory, 81, 209–282.
Owens, Jonathan. (2013). The
historical linguistics of the intrusive *-n in Arabic and West
Semitic. Journal of the American Oriental
Society, 133(2), 217–247.
Souag, Lameen. (2020). When
is templatic morphology borrowed? On the spread of the Arabic
elative. Morphology, 30(4), 469–500.