Cover not available

Review published In: Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics: Volume 7
Edited by Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez
[Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 7] 2009
► pp. 345356

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (18)
References
Bybee, J. L., W. Pagliuca and R. D. Perkins. (1991). Back to the future. In E. C. Traugott & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization. Vol. 2. (pp. 17–58). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, J. L., R. D. Perkins and W. Pagliuca. (1994). The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, aspect and mood in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guilquin, G. & S.Th. Gries. (2008). Corpora and experimental methods: A state-of-the-art review. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 5(1), 1–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, S.Th. (2003). Multifactorial Analysis in Corpus Linguistics: The case of Particle Placement. London/New York: Continuum PressGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Coll.Analysis 31. A program for R for Windows 2.x (available from the author)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, S.Th. & M. Hilpert. (2008). The identification of stages in diachronic data: variabilitybased neighbor clustering. Corpora, 3(1), 59–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, S.Th. & A. Stefanowitsch. (2004). Extending collostructional analysis. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9(1), 97–129. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (Eds.). (2006). Corpora in Cognitive Linguistics. Corpus-Based Approaches to Syntax and Lexis. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(to appear). Cluster analysis and the identification of collexeme classes. In S. Rice & J. Newman (Eds.), Empirical and Experimental Methods in Cognitive/Functional Research. CSLI Publications.
Heine, B. (1995). On the German werden future. In W. Abraham, T. Givon, and S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Discourse, Grammar and Typology (pp. 119–138). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hilpert, M. (2006). Distinctive collexemes and diachrony. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 2(2), 243–256. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hilpert, M. & S.Th. Gries. (2008). Assessing frequency changes in multi-stage diachronic corpora. Applications for historical corpus linguistics and the study of language acquisition. Literary and Linguistic Computing. ( )Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, B. (2006). Morpho-Syntactic Persistency in Spoken English. A Corpus Study at the intersection of variationist sociolinguistics, psycholinguistics, and discourse analysis. (TiLSM 1771) Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A. (2006). Distinctive collexeme analysis and diachrony. A comment. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 2(2), 257–262. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A. & S.Th. Gries. (2003). Collostructions: Investigating the inter-action between words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 81, 209–243. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vater, H. (1997). Werden als Modalverb. In J. P. Calbert & H. Vater (Eds.), Aspekte der Modalität (pp. 71–145). Tubingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wulff, S. (2009). Rethinking Idiomaticity. London/New York: Continuum PressGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zeschel, A. (Ed.). (2008). Usage-based approaches to language processing and representation. Special Issue of Cognitive Linguistics, 18(3).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue