Article published In: Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics: Volume 7
Edited by Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez
[Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 7] 2009
► pp. 245–276
Language typology, task complexity and the development of L2 lexicalization patterns for describing motion events
Published online: 19 November 2009
https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.7.10cad
https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.7.10cad
The present paper focuses on the acquisition of L2 constructions for the expression of motion from a typological (Cadierno, 2008; Talmy, 1985, 1991, 2000) and a psycholinguistic perspective with implications for pedagogy (Robinson, 2003a, 2007; Robinson & Gilabert, 2007a, 2007b). Specifically, we report the results of a cross-linguistic study which examined the extent to which the manipulation of pedagogic tasks in terms of cognitive complexity can facilitate the development of target-like lexicalization patterns and appropriate L2 ways of thinking-for-speaking for the expression of motion by adult L2 learners with typologically similar and typologically different L1s and L2s, i.e., Danish vs. Japanese L1 learners of English. The results of the study show that level of L2 proficiency, assessed using a cloze test, predicts more target-like reference to L2 motion across both L1 groups. Typological similarity between the L1 (Danish) and L2 (English) results in greater use of motion constructions incorporating mention of ground of motion compared to their use by Japanese L1 speakers. More cognitively complex tasks lead to production of more target-like lexicalization patterns, but also only for speakers of the typologically similar L1, Danish.
Cited by (33)
Cited by 33 other publications
Feist, Michele I. & Paula Cifuentes-Férez
Jackson, Daniel O.
Zhu, Sanmao
Gilabert, Roger
Littlemore, Jeannette
Stam, Gale, Kimberly Urbanski, James Lantolf & Tetyana Smotrova
Becerra, Rodrigo, Jorge Osorio, Ítalo Cantarutti & Gabriel Llanquinao
Laws, Jacqueline, Anthony Attwood & Jeanine Treffers-Daller
Allaw, Elissa
Lewandowski, Wojciech & Şeyda Özçalışkan
Reyes, E., J. Massana, F. Alonso, N. León & A. Moragues
Bui, Gavin
2019. Task-readiness and L2 task performance across proficiency levels. In Researching L2 Task Performance and Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 13], ► pp. 253 ff.
Dolgova, Natalia & Andrea Tyler
Dolgova, Natalia & Andrea Tyler
Mano, Miho, Yuko Yoshinari & Kiyoko Eguchi
2019. Interlingual versus intralingual tendencies in second language acquisition. In Teachability and Learnability across Languages [Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching, 6], ► pp. 183 ff.
Hijazo-Gascón, Alberto
Andria, Maria & Raquel Serrano
Cadierno, Teresa
2017. Thinking for speaking about motion in a second language. In Motion and Space across Languages [Human Cognitive Processing, 59], ► pp. 279 ff.
Feryok, Anne
Filipović, Luna
2017. Applying language typology. In Motion and Space across Languages [Human Cognitive Processing, 59], ► pp. 399 ff.
Filipović, Luna
PAE, HYE K., DAPHNE GREENBERG, NICOLE TAYLOR, JACQUELINE LAURES-GORE & LIDIA YVETTE QUINONES
Dolgova Jacobsen, Natalia
Gilabert, Roger, Rosa Manchón & Olena Vasylets
KONISHI, HARUKA, FRANCES WILSON, ROBERTA MICHNICK GOLINKOFF, MANDY J. MAGUIRE & KATHY HIRSH-PASEK
Sánchez, Laura & Camilla Bardel
Cifuentes Férez, Paula
Jackson, Daniel O. & Sakol Suethanapornkul
Michel, Marije C.
Stringer, David
Robinson, Peter
Robinson, Peter
2015. The Cognition Hypothesis, second language task demands, and the SSARC model of pedagogic task sequencing. In Domains and Directions in the Development of TBLT [Task-Based Language Teaching, 8], ► pp. 87 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
