Article published In: Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics: Volume 6
Edited by Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez
[Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 6] 2008
► pp. 208–281
The interaction of metonymy and metaphor in the meaning and form of ‘bahuvrihi’ compounds
Published online: 15 December 2008
https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.6.10bar
https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.6.10bar
This paper reports on ongoing work on a large sample of bahuvrihi compounds in English and Spanish. After a brief characterization of bahuvrihi compounds, distinguishing them from a similar type of exocentric compounds (V+O compounds), the goal of the paper is clearly stated, namely to answer a number of questions, especially these two: (a) Does the metonymy CHARACTERISTIC PROPERTY FOR CATEGORY motivate the exocentric nature of all the compounds in the sample?; (b) Are other metonymies or metaphors also involved? If so, which are the metonymic or metaphoric patterns observable in conceptualizations underlying these compounds? The bulk of the paper is devoted to the detailed conceptual analysis of a large set of representative bahuvrihis in both languages. The results show that the above metonymy is responsible for the exocentric nature of all the compounds in the sample and that the characteristic property mapped by that metonymy is conceptualized in one of these three ways: literally, metonymically or metaphorico-metonymically. These three conceptualization patterns constitute the three major types of bahuvrihis in both languages; various further subtypes are proposed for each type. The paper ends with some tentative remarks on the Cognitive Grammar representation of the semantic structure of these compounds, on the connection between their semantic structure and their grammar and prosody, on a blending account of these lexemes, and on the contrasts identified between both languages.
Cited by (15)
Cited by 15 other publications
Wang, Di & Ruifen Guo
Kos, Petr
Toratani, Kiyoko
2023. Metonymy in the nomenclature of Japanese traditional colors. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 10:1 ► pp. 57 ff.
Diyanati, Masoumeh, Hadaegh Rezaei & Adel Rafiei
2022. Conceptual blending in entrenched Persian noun-noun nominal compounds. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 9:2 ► pp. 297 ff.
Kuczok, Marcin
Pepper, Steve & Pierre J. L. Arnaud
Barcelona, Antonio, Olga Blanco-Carrión & Rossella Pannain
Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, Barbara
Barcelona, Antonio
Barcelona, Antonio
2024. Trends in cognitive-linguistic research on metonymy. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 11:1 ► pp. 51 ff.
Portero Muñoz, Carmen
2014. A constructional approach to transitional formatives. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 12:1 ► pp. 160 ff.
Portero-Muñoz, Carmen
2018. Are smartphone face and Googleheads a real or a fake phenomenon?. In Conceptual metonymy [Human Cognitive Processing, 60], ► pp. 261 ff.
Yoon, Jiyoung
2014. Chapter 2. The role of constructional meanings in novel verb-noun compounds in Spanish. In Romance Perspectives on Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 15], ► pp. 37 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
