Article published In: Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics: Volume 5
Edited by Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez
[Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 5] 2007
► pp. 27–54
A bi-polar theory of nominal and clause structure and function
Published online: 29 November 2007
https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.5.03bal
https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.5.03bal
A bi-polar theory of the structure and function of nominals and clauses is presented in which a specifier, functioning as a referential pole, and a head, functioning as a relational pole, combine to form a referring expression. The theory applies to both object referring expressions, in the case of nominals, and situation referring expressions, in the case of clauses. The bi-polar theory is contrasted with X-Bar Theory — a uni-polar theory in which the head uniquely determines the type of the larger expression in which it occurs. Uni-polar theories adopt a strong notion of endocentricity, which is rejected in the bi-polar theory, where both the specifier and the head make significant and meaningful contributions to the larger expressions in which they occur. The bi-polar theory is also contrasted with Langacker’s conception of the basic structure and function of nominals and clauses.
Keywords: specifier, nominal, clause, structure, function, head, referential pole, meaning, referring expression, relational pole
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Gluck, Kevin A. & Jayde M. King
Myers, Christopher, Jerry Ball, Nancy Cooke, Mary Freiman, Michelle Caisse, Stuart Rodgers, Mustafa Demir & Nathan McNeese
Laird, John E., Kevin Gluck, John Anderson, Kenneth D. Forbus, Odest Chadwicke Jenkins, Christian Lebiere, Dario Salvucci, Matthias Scheutz, Andrea Thomaz, Greg Trafton, Robert E. Wray, Shiwali Mohan & James R. Kirk
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
