Cover not available

Article published In: Discourse Analysis and Language Teaching
Edited by Eva Alcón-Soler and Josep R. Guzman Pitarch
[Australian Review of Applied Linguistics. Series S 16] 2000
► pp. 65–82

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Textual coherence and discourse analysis

 | Northern Arizona University
Published online: 1 January 2000
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/aralss.16.05gra
References (97)
References
Alvermann, D. (1986) Graphic organizers: Cueing devices for comprehending and remembering main ideas. In J. Baumann (ed.) Teaching main idea comprehension. Newark (DE), IRA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alvermann, D., L. Smith and J. Readance (1985) Prior knowledge and comprehension of compatible and incompatible text. Reading Research Quarterly 201:420–436. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anderson, J.R. (1990) Cognitive psychology and its implications, 3rd Edition. New York (WH), Freeman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anderson, T. and B. Armbruster (1984) Content area textbooks. In R.C. Anderson, J. Osborn and R. Tierney (eds) Learning to read in American schools. Hillsdale (NJ), L. Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Armbruster, B. (1984) The problem of “inconsiderate text.” In G. Duffy, L. Roehler and J. Mason (eds) Comprehension instruction. New York, Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Armbruster, B., T. Anderson and J. Meyer (1991) Improving content area reading using instructional graphics. Reading Research Quarterly. 261:393–416. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Armbruster, B., T. Anderson, and J. Ostertag (1987) Does text structure/summarization instruction facilitate learning from expository text? Reading research Quarterly 221:331–346. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barsalou, I. (1992) Cognitive psychology: An overview for cognitive scientists. Hillsdale (NJ), L. Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beck, I. and L. Kucan (1997) Questioning the author. Newark (DE), International Reading Association.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beck, I., M. McKeown and I. Gromoll (1989) Learning from social studies texts. Cognition and Instruction 61:99–158. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beck, I., M. McKeown, G. Sinatra and J. Loxterman (1991) Revising social studies text from a text-processing perspective: Evidence of improved comprehensibility. Reading Research Quarterly 261:251–276. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berkowitz, S. (1986) Effects of instruction in text organization on sixth-grade students’ memory for expository reading. Reading Research Quarterly 211:161–178. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Britton, B. (1994) Understanding expository text. In M. A. Gernsbacher (ed.).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Britton B. and A. Graesser (eds) Models of understanding text. Mahwah (NJ), L. Erlbaum.
Britton, B. and S. Gulgoz (1991) Using Kintsch’s computational model to improve instructional text: Effects of repairing inference calls on recall and cognitive structures. Journal of Educational Psychology. 83:329–345. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Britton, B., S. Gulgoz and S. Glynn (1993) Impact of good and poor writing on learners: Research and Theory. In B. Britton et al. (eds) Learning from textbooks: Theory and practice. Hillsdale (NJ), L. Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Britton, B., L. Van Dusen and S. Gulgoz (1991) Reply to “Response to instructional texts rewritten by five expert teams.” Journal of Educational Psychology 831:149–152. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Britton, B., L. Van Dusen, S. Gulgoz and S. Glynn (1989) Instructional texts rewritten by five expert teams: Revisions and retention improvements. Journal of Educational Psychology. 811:226–239. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, G. and G. Yule (1983) Discourse analysis. New York, Cambridge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carrell, P. (1984) The effects of rhetorical organization on ESL readers. TESOL Quarterly 181:441–469. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1985) Facilitating ESL reading by teaching text structure. TESOL Quarterly. 191:727–752. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1992) Awareness of text structure: Effects on recall. Language Learning 421:1–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carrell, P., B. Pharis and J. Liberto (1989) Metacognitive strategy training for ESL reading. TESOL Quarterly 231:647–678. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carpenter, P., A. Miyake and M. Just (1994) Working memory constraints in comprehension. In M. A. Gernsbacher (ed.).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cox, B., T. Shanahan and E. Sulzby (1990) Good and poor elementary readers’ use of cohesion in writing. Reading Research Quarterly 251.47–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cox, B., T. Shanahan and M. Tinsmann (1991) Children’s knowledge of organization, cohesion, and voice in written exposition. Research in the Teaching of English 251:179–218.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Dijk, T. and W. Kintsch (1983) Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dole, J. and D. Niederhauser (1990) Students’ level of commitment to their naive conceptions and their conceptual change learning from texts. In J. Zutell et al. (eds) Literacy theory and research: Analyses from Multiple paradigms. Rochester (NY), National Reading Conference.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duffy, T. et al. (1989) Models for the design of instructional text. Reading Research Quarterly 241:434–457. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fletcher, C. (1994) Levels of representation in memory for discourse. In M.A. Gernsbacher (ed.).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fletcher, C. et al. (1995) The role of co-occurrence, coreference, and causality in the coherence of conjoined sentences. In R. Lorch and E. O’Brien (eds).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flood, J. and D. Lapp (1990) Reading comprehension instruction for at-risk students: Research-based practice that can make a difference. Journal of Reading 331:490–496.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gardner, H. (1991) The unschooled mind. New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gernsbacher, M.A. (1990) Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale (NJ), L. Erlbaum. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(ed.) Handbook of psycholinguistics. New York, Academic Press.
(1995) Activating knowledge of fictional characters’ emotional states. In C. Weaver, S. Mannes and C. Fletcher (eds).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1996) The structure-building framework: What it is, what it might also be, and why. In B. Britton and A. Graesser (eds).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1997a) Two decades of structure building. Discourse Processes 231:265–304. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1997b) Coherence cues mapping during comprehension. In J. Costermans and M. Fayol (eds) Processing interclausal relationships. Mahwah (NJ), L. Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gernsbacher, M.A. and T. Givón (eds) Coherence in spontaneous text. Philadelphia, J. Benjamins.
Givón, T. (1995) Coherence in text vs. coherence in mind. In M.A. Gernsbacher and T. Givón (eds). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldman, S. and J. Murray (1992) Knowledge of connectors as cohesion devices in text: A comparative study of native-English and English-as-a-second-language speakers. Journal of Educational Psychology 841:504–519. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldman, S. and S. Varma (1995) CAPping the Construction-Integration model and other inventions. In C. Weaver, S. Mannes and C. Fletcher (eds).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldman, S. et al. (1996) Extending capacity-constrained construction integration: Toward “smarter” and flexible models of text construction. In B. Britton and A. Graesser (eds).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldman, S. (1997) Learning from text. Discourse Processes 231:357–398. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grabe, W. (In press) Narrative and expository macro-genres. In A. Johns (ed.), Genre in the classroom: Theory, research, and practice. Mahwah (NJ), L. Erlbaum.
Grabe, W. and D. Gardner (1995) Discourse analysis, coherence, and reading instruction. Lenguas Modernas 221:69–88.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grabe, W. and R.B. Kaplan (1996) Theory and practice of writing. New York, Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graesser, A. and B. Britton (1996) Five metaphors for text understanding. In B. Britton and A. Graesser (eds).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graesser, A. and R. Zwaan (1995) Inference generation and the construction of situation models. In C. Weaver, S. Mannes and C. Fletcher (eds).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graesser, A. et al. (1995) Inference generation during the comprehension of narrative text. In R. Lorch and E. O’Brien (eds).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1996) New models of deep comprehension. In B. Britton and A. Graesser (eds).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guri-Rosenblit, S. (1989) Effects of a tree-diagram on students’ comprehension of main ideas in an expository text with multiple themes. Reading Research Quarterly 241:236–247. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guzzetti, B., T. Snyder and G. Glass (1992) Promoting conceptual change in science: Can texts be used effectively? Journal of Reading 351:642–647.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guzzetti, B., T. Snyder, G. Glass and W. Gamas (1993) Promoting conceptual change in science: A comparative meta-analysis of instructional interventions from reading education and science education. Reading Research Quarterly 281:116–159. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. and R. Hasan (1989) Language, context and text. New York, OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Just, M. and P. Carpenter (1992) A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review 991:122–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kintsch, W. (1988) The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review 951:163–182. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1994) The psychology of discourse processing. In M.A. Gernsbacher (ed.).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1998) Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York, Cambridge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Long, D. et al. (1996) The role of inferential processing in reading ability. In B. Britton and A. Graesser (eds).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lorch, R. (1995) Integration of topic information during reading. In R. Lorch and E. O’Brien (eds).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lorch, R. and E. O’Brien (eds) (1995) Sources of coherence in reading. Hillsdale (NJ), L. Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marshall, N. and M. Glock (1978) Comprehension of connected discourse: A study into the relationships between the structure of text and information recalled. Reading Research Quarterly 141:10–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCutchen, D. (1986) Domain knowledge and linguistic knowledge in the development of writing ability. Journal of Memory and Language 251:431–444. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McGee, L. (1982) Awareness of text structure: Effects on children’s recall of expository prose. Reading Research Quarterly 171:581–590. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McKeown, M. and I. Beck (1990) The assessment and characterization of young learners’ knowledge of a topic in history. American Educational Research Journal 271:688–726. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McKeown, M., I. Beck, G. Sinatra and J. Loxterman (1992) The contribution of prior knowledge and coherent text to comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly 271:78–93. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McKoon, G. and R. Ratcliff (1992) Inference during reading. Psychological Review 991:440–466. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1995) The minimalist Hypothesis: Directions for research. In C. Weaver, S. Mannes and C. Fletcher (eds).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McNamara, D. et al. (1996) Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from texts. Cognition and Instruction 141:1–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meyer, B., D. Brandt and G. Bluth (1980) Use of top-level structure in text: Key for reading comprehension in ninth-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly 161:72–103. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, K. and J. George (1992) Expository prose organizers: Models for reading and writing. Journal of Reading 351:372–377.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. (1994) Psycholinguistics and reading ability. In M.A. Gernsbacher (ed.).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1997) Sentences, individual differences, and multiple texts: Three issue sin text comprehension. Discourse Processes 231:337–355. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. and M. Britt (1995) Where do propositions come from? In C. Weaver, S. Mannes and C. Fletcher (eds).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pressley, M. et al. (1989) Strategies that improve children’s memory and comprehension of text. Elementary School Journal 901:3–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pressley, M. and V. Woloshyn (eds) (1995) Cognitive strategy instruction that really improves children’s academic performance. Cambridge (MA), Brookline Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richgels, D., L. McGee, R. Lomax and C. Sheard (1987) Awareness of four text structures: Effects on recall of expository text. Reading Research Quarterly 221:177–196. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shih, M. (1992) Beyond comprehension exercises in the ESL academic reading class. TESOL Quarterly 261:289–318. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Singer, M. (1990) Psychology of language: An introduction to sentence and discourse processes. Hillsdale (NJ), L. Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1994) Discourse inference processes. In M.A. Gernsbacher (ed.).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spiegel, D. (1992) Linguistic cohesion. In J. Irwin and M. Doyle (eds) Reading/writing connections. Newark (DE), IRA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spyridakis, J. and T. Standal (1987) Signals in expository prose: Effects on reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly 221:285–298. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tang, G. (1992) The effect of graphic representation of knowledge structures on ESL reading comprehension. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 141:177–195. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, B. (1980) Children’s memory for expository text after reading. Reading Research Quarterly 151:399–411. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1982) Text structure and children’s comprehension and memory for expository material. Journal of Educational Psychology 741:323–340. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1992) Text structure, comprehension, and recall. In S. Samuels and A. Farstrup (eds) What research has to say about reading instruction, 2nd ed. Newark (DE), IRA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, B. and R. Beach (1984) The effect of text structure instruction on middle grade students’ comprehension and production of expository prose. Reading Research Quarterly 191:134–146. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vacca, R. and J. Vacca (1999) Content area reading, 6th ed. New York, Harper Collins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van de Kopple, W. (1986) Given and new information and some aspects of the structures, semantics, and pragmatics of written texts. In C. Cooper and S. Greenbaum (eds) Studying writing: Linguistic approaches. Newbury Park (CA), Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1991) Themes, thematic progressions, and some implications for understanding discourse. Written Communication 81:311–347. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van den Broek, P. (1990) The causal inference maker: Towards a process model of inference generation in text comprehension. In D. Balota, G. Flores-D’Arcais and K. Rayner (eds) Comprehension processes in reading. Hillsdale (NJ), L. Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weaver, C., S. Mannes and C. Fletcher (eds) Discourse comprehension: Essays in honor of Walter Kintsch. Hillsdale (NJ), L. Erlbaum.
Widdowson, H. (1984) Grammar, and nonsense, and language. In H. Widdowson, Aspects of language teaching. New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zwaan. R. (1996) Toward a model of literary comprehension. In B. Britton and A. Graesser (eds) Models of understanding text. Mahwah (NJ), L. Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Achugar, Mariana & Brian D. Carpenter
2012. Developing disciplinary literacy in a multilingual history classroom. Linguistics and Education 23:3 ► pp. 262 ff. DOI logo
Thomson, Julie
2003. Clinical discourse analysis: One theory or many?. Advances in Speech Language Pathology 5:1 ► pp. 41 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue