Article published In: Spoken Interaction Studies in Australia
Edited by Rod Gardner
[Australian Review of Applied Linguistics. Series S 11] 1994
► pp. 47–82
>Gossip
Two complementary perspectives on the analysis of casual conversation in English
Published online: 1 January 1994
https://doi.org/10.1075/aralss.11.03sla
https://doi.org/10.1075/aralss.11.03sla
Abstract
This paper argues that the linguistic analysis of gossip reveals not only a great deal about the social role and function of gossip in our society and is therefore important to social theory, but that an analysis of the language of gossip can provide insights into the analysis of casual conversation in English. This paper provides a generic analysis of gossip. The analysis demonstrates that gossip is a culturally determined process with a distinctive structure which can be described. It argues that, in order to describe gossip and other forms of casual conversation, two perspectives are needed: a synoptic approach which looks for complete, static, unified products or texts (generic approach) and a dynamic approach to conversational analysis which focuses on the processes by which moves succeed moves. The latter perspective then focuses on the dynamic unfolding of the interaction which occurs in a gossip text. It allows us to describe how the interactants in conversation can expand, in principle, indefinitely move by move.
References (29)
Eggins, S. (1990) Keeping the conversation going: A systemic-functional analysis of conversational structure in casual sustained talk. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Sydney.
Eggins, S. and D. Slade (forthcoming) The sociolinguistics of casual conversation. Pinter, United Kingdom
(1982) How is a text like a clause? In S. Allen (ed)Text processing: Text analysis and generation, Text typology and attribution (Proceedings of Nobel Symposium 51).Stockholm, Almqvist and Wiksell International.
Halliday, M.A.K. (1981) Type of structure. In M.A.K. Halliday and J.R. Martin (eds.) Readings in systemic linguistics. London, Batsford.
Halliday, M.A.K. and R. Hasan (1985) Language, context and text: aspects of language in a social semiotic perspective. Geelong, Deakin University Press.
Halliday, M.A.K. and G. Plum (1983) On casual conversation. In R. Hasan (ed) Discourse on discourse. Occasional Papers No 71, Macquarie University.
Harding, S. (1975) Women and words in a Spanish village. In R.R. Reiter (ed.) Towards an anthropology of women. New York, Monthly Review Press.
Haviland, J.B. (1977) Gossip, reputation and knowledge in Zinacantan. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.
Labov, W and J. Waletzky (1967) Narrative analysis: oral versions of personal experiences. In J. Helm (ed.) Essays on the verbal and visual arts. American Ethnological Society. Proceedings of Spring Meeting, 1966, University of Washington Press: Washington, D.C.:12–14.
Martin, J.R. (1985) Factual writing: Exploring and challenging social reality. Geelong, Deakin University Press.
(1992) English text: System and structure. Philadelphia/ Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
Martin, J.R. and J. Rothery (1986) Writing project report No. 4, Working Papers in Linguistics. Linguistics Department, University of Sydney.
Mitchell, T.F. (1957) The language of buying and selling texts in Cyrenaica: a situational statement. Hesperis 261. Reprinted in T.F. Mitchell (1975) Principles of Firthian linguistics (Longmans Linguistics Library), London, Longman.
Plum, G. (1988) Text and contextual conditioning in spoken English: a genre-based approach. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Linguistics Department, University of Sydney.
Poynton, C. (1984) Forms and functions: names as vocatives. Nottingham Linguistics Circular, 131:1–34.
(1989) Discourse analysis of spoken English: What can generic analysis offer to the description of spoken interaction? Department Seminar, Linguistics Department, University of Sydney.
(1990) Talk between friends: Two complementary perspectives on the analysis of casual conversation. Seminar Paper, Macquarie University.
Slade, D. and R. Gardner (1987) Interactional skills in casual conversation. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 8, 1:105–120.
