Article published In: Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 9:1 (1986) ► pp.123–135
The transitional stage of a second child – 18 months to 2 years
Published online: 1 January 1986
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.9.1.06old
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.9.1.06old
Abstract
Two case studies have been done on the early language development of boys (without siblings), using a functional framework (Halliday, 1975; Painter, 1984). This paper will discuss the results of a case study of a second-born child, Alison, analyzed using the same methods as the above studies.
The similarities and differences between the children will be examined. They all made a functional distinction between language for learning (“Mathetic”) and language for doing (“Pragmatic”), although the distinction was expressed differently in Alison’s case. Differences were also noted in Alison’s development of Transitivity and Mood. The relevance of environmental factors will also be discussed.
References (4)
Halliday, M.A.K. (1975) Learning how to mean: explorations in the development of language. London, Edward Arnold.
Nelson, K. (1981) Individual differences in language development: implications for development and language. Developmental Psychology, 17, 2:170–187.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Halliday, M.A.K.
Torr, Jane
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
