Cover not available

Article published In: Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 38:1 (2015) ► pp.24–49

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF

Chairperson or chairman? – A study of Chinese EFL teachers’ gender inclusivity

 | The Hong Kong Institute of Education
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 1 January 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.38.1.02lee
Given the potential influence of teachers’ linguistic practice on children’s language use and gender role development, the present study seeks to examine the extent of linguistic discrimination present in teachers’ language. A total of 215 Chinese EFL teachers were invited to participate in the survey, which included a series of elicitation tests on their selection of English words for occupational titles, and the choice of generic pronouns anaphoric to people of unknown gender. The findings revealed that, while gender-biased language is still widely used, non-sexist linguistic reform has had an impact on Chinese EFL teachers, some of whom have expressed a concern with regard to avoiding sexist language. The study also found that choice of generic pronouns co-varied with such factors as semantic meaning, word structure and the gender stereotypes associated with particular occupations.
References (76)
All-China Women’s Federation. (2009). Female-heavy gender imbalance of primary school teachers. Retrieved August 14, 2014, from [URL].
Allen, R. (2008). Common errors and problems in English. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Amare, N. (2007). Where is she? Gender occurrences in online grammar guides. Research in the Teaching of English, 42(2), 163–187.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Andrews, G. (2011). China makes unprecedented English-language push. Retrieved August 15, 2014, from [URL].
Baker, P. (2010). Will Ms ever be as frequent as Mr? A corpus-based comparison of gendered terms across four diachronic corpora of British English. Gender and Language, 4(1), 125–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baranowski, M. (2002). Current usage of the epicene pronoun in written English. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 6(3), 378–397. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baron, D. (1986). Grammar and gender. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benatar, D. (2005). Sexist language: Alternatives to the alternatives. Public Affairs Quarterly, 19(1), 1–9.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Essex: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bodine, A. (1975). Androcentrism in prescriptive grammar: Singular ‘they’, sex indefinite ‘he’ and ‘he or she’. Language in Society, 4(2), 129–146. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burchfield, R. (1981). The spoken word: A BBC guide. London: British Broadcasting Corporation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carter, A. (1980). The language of the sisterhood. In L. Michaels & C. Ricks (Eds.), The state of the language (pp. 226–234). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Choi, P. K. (2012). 香港性別平等教育狀況考察 (A study of gender equity in Hong Kong education). In P. K. Choi & K. W. Chan (Eds.), Gender perspectives in education: Empirical research into schooling processes (pp. 179–192). Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
CNTV. (2013). Male nurses needed in Chinese job market. Retrieved July 7, 2015, from [URL].
Cochran, E. P. (1996). Gender and the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 30(1), 159–162. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Commercial Radio Australia. (2004). Codes of practice and guidelines. Retrieved August 14, 2014, from [URL].
Cronin, C., & Jreisat, S. (1995). Effects of modeling on the use of nonsexist language among high school freshpersons and seniors. Sex Roles, 33(11–12), 819–830. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). How language works: How babies babble, words change meaning, and languages live or die. Woodstock, N.Y.: Overlook Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eckert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (2003). Language and gender. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ettner, C. (2002). In Chinese, men and women are equal – or – women and men are equal? In M. Hellinger & H. Bußmann (Eds.), Gender across languages: The linguistic representation of women and men (vol. 21) (pp. 29–55). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fowler, H. W. (1965). A dictionary of modern English usage (rev. ed. by Sir Ernes Gowers). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fromkin, V., Rodman, R., & Hyams, N. (2014). An introduction to language. Boston, Mass.: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geng, J. (2007). Removal of toxic English teaching and learning styles in China. US-China Education Review, 4(5), 42–45.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbon, M. (1999). Feminist perspectives on language. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
He, D., & Zhang, Q. (2010). Native speaker norms and China English: From the perspective of learners and teachers in China. TESOL Quarterly, 44(4), 769–789. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hellinger, M. (2001). English – Gender in a global language. In M. Hellinger & H. Bußmann (Eds.), Gender across languages: The linguistic representation of women and men (Vol. 11) (pp. 105–113). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Henley, N. M. (1989). Molehill or mountain? What we know and don’t know about sex bias in language. In M. Crawford & M. Gentry (Eds.), Gender and thought: Psychological perspective (pp. 59–78). New York: Springer-Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmes, J., Sigley, R. J., & Terraschke, A. (2009). From chairman to chairwoman to chairperson: Exploring the move from sexist usages to gender neutrality. In P. Peters, P. Collins & A. Smith (Eds.), Comparative studies in Australian and New Zealand English: Grammar and beyond (pp. 183–204). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacobs, G. M., Zhuo, Q. Y., Jocson, P. C., Ong, C. W., & Austria, M. E. D. (1996). Asian secondlanguage educationists’ views of gender-inclusive English. TEFLIN Journal, 81, 86–103.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jochnowitz, G. (1982). Everybody likes pizza, doesn’t he or she? American Speech, 57(3), 198–203. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, K. (1996). The politics of the revival of infant abandonment in China, with special reference to Hunan. Population and Development Review, 22(1), 77–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kingston, A. J., & Lovelace, T. L. (1977). Guidelines for authors: A new form of censorship? Journal of Literacy Research, 9(1), 89–93. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman’s place. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, F. K. J. (1999). Acceptability and usage in Australian English and Hong Kong English. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, J. F. K. (2001). Attitudes towards debatable usages among English language teachers and students. Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 1–21.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Acceptability of sexist language among young people in Hong Kong. Sex Roles, 56(5–6), 285–295. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Perceptions of ELT among English language teachers in China. Education Journal, 37(1–2), 137–154.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, J. F. K., & Collins, P. (2006). Linguistic acceptability in Hong Kong English. Asian Englishes, 9(1), 24–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Australian English-language textbooks: The gender issues. Gender and Education, 21(4), 353–370. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martyna, W. (1978). What does ‘he’ mean? Use of the generic masculine. Journal of Communication, 28(1), 130–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCormick, T. M. (1994). Creating the nonsexist classroom: A multicultural approach. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, C., & Swift, K. (1976). Words and women. New York: Anchor Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mills, S. (2008). Language and sexism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mills, S., & Mullany, L. (2011). Language, gender and feminism: Theory, methodology and practice. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mittins, W. H., Salu, M., Edminson, M., & Coyne, S. (1970). Attitudes to English usage. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nilsen, A. P. (1987). Guidelines against sexist language: A case history. In J. Penfield (Ed.), Women and language in transition (pp. 37–64). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). Why keep searching when it’s already “their”? Reconsidering “everybody’s” pronoun problem. English Journal, 90(4), 68–73. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Partridge, E. (1965). Usage and abusage. London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pauwels, A. (1997). Of handymen and waitpersons: A linguistic evaluation of job classifieds. Australian Journal of Communication, 24(1), 58–69.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1998). Women changing language. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000). Does language reform lead to linguistic change? Australian Language Matters, 8(1), 3.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Gender inclusivity or ‘grammar rules OK’? Linguistic prescriptivism vs linguistic discrimination in the classroom. Language and Education, 20(2), 128–140. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pauwels, A., & Wrightson-Turcotte, K. (2001). Pronoun choice and feminist language change in the Australian media. Australian Journal of Communication, 28(1), 69–82.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peters, P. (2004). The Cambridge guide to English usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poynton, C. (1989). Language and gender: Making the difference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rainer Dangel, J., & Durden, T. R. (2010). The nature of teacher talk during small group activities. Young children, 65(1), 74–78, 80–81.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ravitch, D. (2003). The language police: How pressure groups restrict what students learn. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sadker, D. M., & Silber, E. S. (2007). Gender in the classroom: Foundations, skills, methods, and strategies across the curriculum. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schneider, J. W., & Hacker, S. L. (1973). Sex role imagery and use of the generic ‘man’ in introductory texts: A case in the sociology of sociology. American Sociologist, 81, 12–18.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shaffer, M. A., Joplin, J. R. W., Bell, M. P., Lau, T., & Oguz, C. (2000). Gender discrimination and jobrelated outcomes: A cross-cultural comparison of working women in the United States and China. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 571, 395–427. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shan, X. (2002). Guangdong badly in need of male nurses. Retrieved August 14, 2014, from [URL].
Shaw, S., & Hoeber, L. (2003). ‘A strong man is direct and a direct woman is a bitch’: Gendered discourses and their influence on employment roles in sport organizations. Journal of Sport Management, 17(4), 347–375. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Snooks & Co. (2002). Style manual for authors, editors and printers. Canberra: John Wiley – Sons.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spender, D. (1980). Man made language. London: Routledge – Kegan Paul.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sunderland, J., Cowley, M., Abdul Rahim, F., Leontzakou, C., & Shattuck, J. (2000). From bias ‘in the text’ to ‘teacher talk around the text’: An exploration of teacher discourse and gendered foreign language textbook texts. Linguistics and Education, 11(3), 251–286. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swan, M. (2005). Practical English usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swim, J. K., Mallett, R., & Stangor, C. (2004). Understanding subtle sexism: Detection and use of sexist language. Sex Roles, 51(3–4), 117–128. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tao, B. (2007). Research into sexism in language testing and its implications to language testing in China. Paper presented at the International Conference on Language Testing, China.
Wang, Y. (2010). 從 從 ‘ta’ 看 ‘他’ 與 ‘她’ (A study of ‘他’ and ‘她’ through ‘ta’). 《大 眾 文 藝》 61, 78.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Winter, J., & Pauwels, A. (2006). Men staying at home looking after their children: Feminist linguistic reform and social change. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(1), 16–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yu, T. (2010). Businesswomen show mettle in man’s world. China Daily. Retrieved August 14, 2014, from [URL].
Yu, W. M., et al. (2012). 香港教師培訓課程中的性別教育元素初探 (Gender education in Hong Kong teacher training programs: A preliminary study). In P. K. Choi & K. W. Chan (Eds.), Gender perspectives in education: Empirical research into schooling processes (pp. 135–148). Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhao, H. (2011). Gender construction and negotiation in the Chinese EFL classroom. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Pub.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Sun, Hanzhong, Wei Cheng, Hye Pae & Li Wang
2025. Gender bias in Chinese EFL writing: A corpus-based study of epicene pronouns. Linguistics and Education 89 ► pp. 101464 ff. DOI logo
Tarrayo, Veronico N., Ernesto Cordero Collo & Julius Cesar R. Pascual
2025. Filipino journalism educators’ perspectives on integrating gender-fair language in English into teaching. Media Practice and Education ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Tarrayo, Veronico N.
2024.  Using the third-person singular pronoun they in academic writing: perspectives from English language teachers in Philippine universities . Language Awareness 33:3 ► pp. 625 ff. DOI logo
Tarrayo, Veronico N.
2025. Does gender-fair language matter?. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 48:2 ► pp. 199 ff. DOI logo
Tarrayo, Veronico N., Jiaqi Tian & Darío Luis Banegas
2024. Language Education and Gender. In Reference Module in Social Sciences, DOI logo
Yang, Hengwen & Xiufeng Zhang
2024. Chinese EFL Students’ Awareness of English Epicene Pronouns: Towards a More Gender-Inclusive Language. Sage Open 14:4 DOI logo
Zhang, Xiufeng & Hengwen Yang
2021. Gender voices in Chinese university students’ English writing: A corpus study. Linguistics and Education 64 ► pp. 100935 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Xiufeng & Hengwen Yang
2024. Perception and usage of English epicene pronouns among L2 teachers in China‐focusing on he, he or she and they. European Journal of Education 59:3 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue