Article published In: Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 36:2 (2013) ► pp.177–196
Willingness to communicate in english as a second language as a stable trait or context-influenced variable
Case studies of Iranian Migrants to New Zealand
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 1 January 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.36.2.04cam
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.36.2.04cam
Whether Willingness to Communicate (WTC) is a permanent trait or is modified by situational context has previously been investigated in various studies (e.g. Cao & Philp, 2006; Kang, 2005; MacIntyre & Legatto, 2011). However, most research into WTC has been quantitative or conducted in the English as a Foreign Language (EFL) or Study Abroad situation in countries such as Canada, Japan, Korea and China. This article reports on the qualitative component of an exploratory mixed methods study in a New Zealand (NZ) university with participants who are permanent migrants from Iran. These students completed a questionnaire and participated in further in-depth semi-structured interviews. The article provides an overview of previous research into WTC and motivation in Iran and NZ as the context for these three case studies. In this study, six factors, both trait and situational, were identified as having an effect on these students’ WTC in both countries: self-perceived competence; personality; anxiety; motivation and the importance of English; and the learning context. Finally, this article discusses the contribution of this study to the WTC field of research, identifying the implications of these results for teachers of English in the ESL (English as a Second Language or migrant) context and possible avenues for future research.
Keywords: L2 motivation, L2 willingness to communicate, case studies
References (36)
Ahmadi Darani, P. (2012). A critical look at the status of FLT in the Iranian context: Challenges and opportunities. Iranian EFL Journal, 8(1), 176–184.
Allwright, D., & Bailey, K. M. (1996). Focus on the language classroom. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Baker, S., & MacIntyre, P. (2000). The role of gender and immersion in communication and second language learning. Language Learning, 50(2), 311–341.
Cao, Y. (2009). Understanding the notion of interdependence, and the dynamics of willingness to communicate. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Auckland University, Auckland, New Zealand.
(2011). Investigating situational willingness to communicate within second language classrooms from an ecological perspective. System, 39(4), 468–479.
Cao, Y., & Philp, J. (2006). Interactional context and willingness to communicate: A comparison of behaviour in whole class, group and dyadic interaction. System, 341, 480–493.
(2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in Second Language Acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
(2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford, England: OUP.
Ghassemi, E., & Shahsavari, N. (2011). “What is not working?”. A study of students’ perceptions of problems and concerns over English language learning at Islamic Azad University, Hajiabad Branch. Iranian EFL Journal, 7(2), 41–52.
Ghorbani, M. R. (2007). ESL textbook evaluation and graphic representation. Retrieved November 29, 2010 from [URL]
Kang, S.-J. (2005). Dynamic emergence of situational willingness to communicate in a second language. System, 331, 277–292.
Kim, S. J. (2004). Exploring willingness to communicate (WTC) in English among Korean EFL (English as a foreign language) students in Korea: WTC as a predictor of success in second language acquisition (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Kuhl, J. (1994). A theory of action and state orientations. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Volition and personality (pp. 9–46). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
MacIntyre, P. D. (2007). Willingness to communicate in the second language: Understanding the decision to speak as a volitional process. The Modern Language Journal, 91(4), 564–576.
MacIntyre, P. D., Clément, R., Dörnyei, Z., & Noels, K. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545–562.
MacIntyre, P. D., Clément, R., & Noels, K. A. (2007). Affective variables, attitude and personality in context. In D. Ayoun (Ed.), Handbook of French applied linguistics (pp. 270–298). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
MacIntyre, P. D., & Doucette, J. (2010). Willingness to communicate and action control, System, 381, 161–171.
MacIntyre, P. D., & Legatto, J. J. (2011). A dynamic system approach to willingness to communicate: Developing an idiodynamic method to capture rapidly changing affect. Applied Linguistics, 32(2), 149–171.
Maleki, A., & Zangani, E. (2007). A survey on the relationship between English Language proficiency and the academic achievement of Iranian EFL students. Asian EFL Journal, 91, 86–96.
Matsuoka, R. (2005). Willingness to communicate among Japanese college students. Proceedings of the 10th Conference of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 151–159.
Moiinzavari, M. (2008). Motivational orientation in English language learning: A study of Iranian undergraduate students. Global practices of language teaching. In A. Shafaei & M. Nejati, (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Online Language Conference (IOLC 2008) (pp. 126–135). Boca Raton, FA: Universal Publishers.
Papi, M. (2010). The L2 motivational self system, L2 anxiety, and motivated behavior: A structural equation modeling approach. System, 381, 467–479.
Papi, M., & Abdollahzadeh, E. (2012). Teacher motivational practice, student motivation, and possible L2 selves: An examination in the Iranian EFL context. Language Learning, 62(2), 571–594.
Peng, J. (2007). Willingness to communicate in an L2 and integrative motivation among college students in an intensive English language program in China. University of Sydney Papers in TESOL, 21, 33–59.
Razmjoo, S. A. (2007). High schools’ or private institutes’ textbooks? Which fulfill communicative language teaching principles in the Iranian context? Asian EFL Journal, 9(4), 126–140.
Riasati, M. J. (2012). EFL learners’ perceptions of factors influencing willingness to speak English in language classrooms: A qualitative study. World Applied Sciences Journal, 17(10), 1287–1297.
Taguchi, T., Magid, M., & Papi, M. (2009). The L2 motivational self system among Japanese, Chinese and Iranian learners of English: A comparative study. In Z. Dörnyei, & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 Self (pp. 66–97). Bristol, England: Multilingual Matters, Bristol.
Vaezi, S. (2007, November). Communicative language teaching: In the Middle East? Paper presented at the LED conference, Waikato University, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Vaezi, S., & Sadeghilar, N. (2009, October). Willingness to communicate. Paper presented at the TELLSI 7 Conference, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran.
Vaezi, Z. (2008). Language learning motivation among Iranian undergraduate students. World Applied Science Journal, 51, 54–61.
Wen, W., & Clément, R. (2003). A Chinese conceptualisation of willingness to communicate in ESL. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 16(1), 18–38.
Cited by (15)
Cited by 15 other publications
Bensalem, Elias, Amy S. Thompson & Fahad Alenazi
Simatupang, Ervina CM
Abebe, Dereje Teshome
Kirchhoff, Natalie & Raúl Dávila-Romero
Kirchhoff, Natalie & Raúl Dávila-Romero
Mori, Yoko
Sarwari, Kawita
Teshome, Dereje, Getachew Syoum Weldemariam & Guta Legese
Wilson, Victoria E., Robyne Le Brocque, John Drayton & Sara Hammer
Cameron, Denise
Halupka-Rešetar, Sabina, Ljiljana Knežević & Jagoda Topalov
Zhang, Jiayi, Nadin Beckmann & Jens F. Beckmann
Bukhari, Syeda Farzana & Xiaoguang Cheng
Atrian, Anahita, Afsaneh Ghanizadeh & Soroor Rostami
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
