Cover not available

Article published In: Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 36:2 (2013) ► pp.146–159

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF

Learning to hear by learning to speak

The effect of articulatory training on Arab learners’ English phonemic discrimination

 | American University of Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
 | Southern Cross University, Australia & Sohar University, Sultanate of Oman
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 1 January 2013
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.36.2.02lin
In this paper we explore English pronunciation teaching within an English as an International Language (EIL) framework, arguing that teaching learners how to produce English phonemes can lead to an improvement in their aural ability. English as an Additional Language (EAL) learners often have difficulty discriminating between and producing specific sounds of the target language; Arabic speakers, for example, typically have difficulty distinguishing between /p/ and /b/ in words such as pin and bin. The research described here indicates that explicit articulatory training in the production of two problematic sounds, /p/ and /b/, improves learners’ ability to perceptually discriminate between the two. Following articulatory training, participants were better at correctly identifying which member of a minimal pair they heard (pack or back, for example), whereas simply providing focused aural exposure to those sounds, as advocated in the non-form focused intuitive-imitative approach, did not lead to similar improvement. This suggests that for sounds that are perceptually difficult for learners, complementing exposure as advocated by the intuitive-imitative approach with articulatory training may produce the best results in terms of segmental discrimination and ultimately target language production. We also point to evidence that accuracy in segmental production is especially relevant in the EIL context.
References (44)
Al-Beloushi, J. M. (2012). Investigating EFL Oman Grade 2 learners’ ability to produce English phonics. Unpublished Dissertation. M.Ed. SQU, Muscat, Oman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Altaha, F. (1995). Pronunciation Errors made by Saudi university students learning English: Analysis and remedy. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 1091, 110–123.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ammon, U. (2000). Towards more fairness in International English: linguistic rights of non-native speakers? In Robert Philipson (Ed.) Rights to language: Equity and education (pp. 112–116). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anderson-Hsieh, J. Johnson, R. & Koehler, K. (1992). The relationship between native speaker judgements of nonnative pronunciation and deviance in segmentals, prosody and syllable structure. Language Learning, 421, 529–555. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anderson-Hsieh, J. R. & Koehler, K. (1988). The effect of foreign accent and speaking rate on native speaker comprehension. Language Learning, 381, 561–593. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Avery, P. & Ehrlich, S. (1992). Teaching American English pronunciation. Oxford, England: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D. & Goodwin, J. (1996). Teaching pronunciation: Reference for teachers of English to speakers of other languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clyne, M. & Sharifian, F. (2008). English as an international language: challenges and possibilities. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 31(3), 28.1–28.16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crystal, D. (1997). English as a global language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Two thousand million? Updates on the statistics of English. English Today, 24(1) 3–6. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Derwing, T., Munro, M. J. & Wiebe, G. (1998). Evidence in favor of a broad framework for pronunciation instruction. Language Learning, 481, 393–410. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dupuy, B. C. (1999). “Narrow Listening: an alternative way to develop and enhancing listening comprehension in students of French as a foreign language.” System, 271, 351–361. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flege, J. (1991). Perception and production: the relevance of phonetic input to L2 phonological learning. In T. Hueber & C. Ferguson, (Eds.), Crosscurrents in second language acquisition and linguistics theories (pp. 249–289). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hahn, L. (2004). Primary stress and intelligibility: Research to motivate the teaching of suprasegmentals. TESOL Quarterly, 381, 201–223. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hall, G. (2011). Exploring English language teaching in action. Routledge: New York. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Higgins, C (2003). “Ownership” of English in the Outer Circle: An Alternative to the NS-NNS Dichotomy. TESOL Quarterly, 37(4), 615–644. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
International House. (2009). Unit 4, Section 3: Learning to listen by listening. DELTA Module One Course Material.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jalal, A. (2011). Pronunciation problems among Saudi learners: A case study at the preparatory year program. Language in India: Strength for today and bright hope for tomorrow, 111, 22–36.Retrieved from [URL]
Jenkins, J. (2000). The phonology of English as an international language. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002). A sociolinguistically based, empirically researched pronunciation syllabus for English as an international language. Applied Linguistics, 231, 83–103. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). World Englishes: a resource book for students. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kachru, B. B. (1985). Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In R. Q. A. H. Widdowson (Ed.), English in the world: Teaching and learning the language and literatures (pp. 11–36). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kang, O. (2010). Relative salience of suprasegmental features on judgments of L2 comprehensibility and accentedness. System, 381, 301–315. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, A. (2007) World Englishes: Implications for international communication and English language teaching. Melbourne, Australia: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krashen, S.D. (1996). The case for narrow listening. System, 241, 97–100. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levis, J. M. (2005). Changing Contexts and Shifting Paradigms in Pronunciation Teaching” TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 369–377. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Logan, J. S. & Pruitt, J. S. (1995). Methodological issues in training listeners to perceive non-native phonemes. In W. Strange, (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in crosslanguage research (pp. 351–377). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Long, M. H. & Crookes, G. (1992). Three approaches to task-based syllabus design. TESOL Quarterly, 26(1), 27–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morley, J. (1991). Pronunciation component in teaching English to speakers of other languages. TESOL Quarterly, 25(3), 481–520. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. & Newton, J. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL listening and speaking. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oman Academic Accreditation Authority (2008) The Oman Academic Standards for General Foundation Programmes. Retrieved (29.10.12) from, [URL]
Pennycook, A. (1999). Pedagogical implications of different frameworks for understanding the global spread of English. In C. Gnutzman, (Ed.), Teaching and learning English as a global language. Tubingen, Germany: Stauffenberg Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ridgway, T. (2000). Listening Strategies – I beg your pardon? ELT Journal, 54(2), 196–197. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saito, K. (2011). Identifying Problematic Segmental Features to Acquire Comprehensible Pronunciation in EFL Settings: The Case of Japanese Learners of English. RELC Journal, 42(3), 363–378. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scrivener, J. (2005). Learning teaching. Oxford, UK: Heinemann.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seidlhofer, B. (2001). Pronunciation. In R. Carter & D. Nunan, (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages (pp. 56–65). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Research perspectives on teaching English as a lingua franca. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 241, 209–239. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). Key concepts in ELT: English as a Lingua Franca. ELT Journal, 59(4), 339–341. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sharifian, F. (Ed.). (2009). English as an international language: Perspectives and pedagogical issues. London, UK: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
The British National Corpus (2007). The British national corpus, version 3 (BNC XML Edition).Distributed by Oxford University Computing Services on behalf of the BNC Consortium. Retrieved October 12, 2012, from [URL].
Trubetzkoy, N. S. (1939). Grundzüge der phonologie. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague, 1. Paris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Underhill, A. (2005). Sound foundations. London, UK: Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ur, P. (2008). A course in language teaching: Practice and theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
VOICE (2011). The Vienna-Oxford international corpus of English (version 1.1 Online). Director: Barbara Seidlhofer; Researchers: Angelika Breiteneder, Theresa Klimpfinger, Stefan Majewski, Ruth Osimk, Marie-Luise Pitzl. Retrieved November 27, 2012, from [URL]
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Sweeting, Arizio M. & Michael D. Carey
2025. What pronunciation specialists believe CELTA tutors need to know to prepare student teachers to teach pronunciation. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 63:1 ► pp. 471 ff. DOI logo
Sweeting, Arizio M. & Michael D. Carey
2025. Strengthening the nexus of research and practice in CELTA pronunciation instruction. System 130 ► pp. 103623 ff. DOI logo
Mallinson, Christine, Vandana P. Janeja, Chloe Evered, Zahra Khanjani, Lavon Davis, Noshaba Nasir Bhalli & Kifekachukwu Nwosu
2024. A place for (socio)linguistics in audio deepfake detection and discernment: Opportunities for convergence and interdisciplinary collaboration. Language and Linguistics Compass 18:5 DOI logo
Yenkimaleki, Mahmood
2021. Prosody training benefits in perception vs. production skills in simultaneous interpreting: an experimental study. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 10 DOI logo
Ivanova, Sofia Alexandrovna & Victoria Hasko
2019. Articulatory Phonetics. In Applied Linguistics for Teachers of Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Learners [Advances in Linguistics and Communication Studies, ], ► pp. 285 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue