Cover not available

Article published In: Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 36:1 (2013) ► pp.52–70

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF

L2 vocabulary knowledge in and out of context

Is it the same for reading and listening?

 | University of Nottingham
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 1 January 2013
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.36.1.03van
The vast majority of second language (L2) vocabulary research focuses on learners’ knowledge of isolated word forms. However, it is unclear to what extent this knowledge can be used as an indicator of knowledge in context (i.e. reading and listening). This study aims to shed light on this issue by comparing ESL learners’ knowledge of the meaning of isolated words (‘decontextual knowledge’) with their knowledge of the same words in both reading and listening (‘contextual knowledge’). Decontextual knowledge was measured in a free recall interview. Contextual knowledge was measured through a task in which participants paraphrased sentences containing the target items from both a written and spoken narrative. Results showed that learners’ decontextual and contextual knowledge agreed in 65% of the cases. This indicates a considerable gap between the two, and emphasises that scores on decontextualised vocabulary test should not be used as predictors of learners’ vocabulary knowledge in context. In addition, learners demonstrated significantly better knowledge of word meaning in the reading than listening mode, which may be due to processing difficulties in listening as well as better inferencing opportunities in reading. Two additional factors found to affect both decontextual and contextual knowledge are word frequency and learners’ vocabulary size.
References (40)
Broersma, M. & Cutler, A. (2008). Phantom word activation in L2. System, 361, 22–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buck, G. (2001). Assessing Listening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cobb, T. (n.d.). Web Vocabprofile. Retrieved April 3, 2012, from [URL], an adaptation of Heatley and Nation’s (1994) Range.
Ellis, N. C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 241, 143–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Field, J. (2008). Revising segmentation hypotheses in first and second language listening. System, 361, 35–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goh, C. C. M. (2000). A cognitive perspective on language learners’ listening comprehension problems. System, 281, 55–75. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haynes, M. (1993). Patterns and perils of guessing in second language reading. In T. Huckin, M. Haynes & J. Coady (Eds.), Second language reading and vocabulary learning (pp. 46–66). Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heatley, A. & Nation, P. (1994). Range. Victoria University of Wellington, NZ.[Computer program, available at [URL].
Hirsh, D. (2010). Researching vocabulary. In B. Paltridge & A. Phakiti, (Eds.), Continuum companion to research methods in Applied Linguistics (pp. 222–239). London: Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huckin, T. & Bloch, J. (1993). Strategies for inferring word meaning in context: a cognitive model. In T. Huckin, M. Haynes & J. Coady (Eds.), Second language reading and vocabulary learning (pp. 153–180). Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hu, H.-C. M. & Nation, P. (2000). Unknown vocabulary density and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language 131, 403–430.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laufer, B. & Nation, P. (1999). A vocabulary–size test of controlled productive vocabulary. Language Testing, 161, 33–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lund, R. J. (1991). A comparison of second language listening and reading comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 751, 196–204. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meara, P. (1992). EFL vocabulary tests. Swansea: Center for Applied Language Studies, University of Wales Swansea.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mecartty, F. H. (2000). Lexical and grammatical knowledge in reading and listening comprehension by foreign language learners of Spanish. Applied Language Learning, 111, 323–348.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milton, J. (2009). Measuring second language vocabulary acquisition. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milton, J. & Hopkins, N. (2006). Comparing phonological and orthographic vocabulary size: Do vocabulary tests underestimate the knowledge of some learners? Canadian Modern Language Review, 631, 127–147.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nation, P. (1983). Testing and teaching vocabulary. Guidelines, 51, 12–24.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. Boston: Heinle and Heinle.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? The Canadian Modern Language Review 631, 59–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Fundamental issues in modelling and assessing vocabulary knowledge. In H. Daller, J. Milton & J. Treffers-Daller, (Eds.), Modelling and assessing vocabulary knowledge (pp. 35–44). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Teaching vocabulary: Strategies and techniques. Boston: Heinle.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nation, P. & Gu, P.Y. (2007). Focus on vocabulary. Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Park, G.-P. (2004). Comparison of L2 listening and reading comprehension by University students learning English in Korea. Foreign Language Annals, 371, 448–458. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Qian, D. D. (1999). Assessing the roles of depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 561, 283–307. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). Demystifying lexical inferencing: The role of aspects of vocabulary knowledge. TESL Canada Journal, 221, 34–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Plumbing the depths: How should the construct of vocabulary knowledge be defined? In P. Bogaards & B. Laufer, (Eds.), Vocabulary in a second language: Selection, acquisition and testing (pp. 209–228). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Second language vocabulary assessment: Current practices and new directions. International Journal of English Studies, 71, 105–125.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Read, J. & Chapelle, C.A. (2001). A framework for second language vocabulary assessment. Language Testing, 181, 1–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reves, T. & Levine, A. (1988). The FL receptive skills: Same or different? System, 161, 327–336. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D. & Clapham, C. (2001). Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test. Language Testing, 181, 55–88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schoonen, R. (2011). How language ability is assessed. In E. Hinkel, (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. II1) (pp. 701–716). London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stæhr, L. S. (2008). Vocabulary size and the skills of listening, reading and writing. The Language Learning Journal, 361, 139–152. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vandergrift, L. (2011). Second langauge listening: Presage, process, product and pedagogy. In E. Hinkel, (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. II1) (pp. 455–471). London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Zeeland, H. & Schmitt, N. (2012). Lexical coverage and L1 and L2 listening comprehension: The same or different from reading comprehension? Applied Linguistics. Advance Access published December 18, 2012, .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weber, A. & Cutler, A. (2004). Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 501, 1–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wesche, M. B. & Paribakht, T.S. (2010). Lexical inferencing in a first and second language: Cross–linguistic dimensions. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (10)

Cited by ten other publications

Brooks, Gavin, Jon Clenton & Simon Fraser
2025. Exploring Potential Factors Affecting Reading Comprehension in EAL Learners: A Preliminary Corpus-Based Analysis. Languages 10:2 ► pp. 30 ff. DOI logo
Dudley, Amber & Emma Marsden
2024. The lexical content of high‐stakes national exams in French, German, and Spanish in England. Foreign Language Annals 57:2 ► pp. 311 ff. DOI logo
Zeng, Jie
2024. International intelligibility of English spoken by college students in the Bashu dialect area of China. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 11:1 DOI logo
Kim, Young Ae, Tim Stoeckel & Stuart McLean
2023. Can Japanese learners of English comprehend inflectional and derivational forms in listening? Testing the validity of the word family counting unit. The Modern Language Journal 107:3 ► pp. 819 ff. DOI logo
Marsden, Emma, Amber Dudley & Rachel Hawkes
2023. Use of word lists in a high‐stakes, low‐exposure context: Topic‐driven or frequency‐informed. The Modern Language Journal 107:3 ► pp. 669 ff. DOI logo
Mister, Bianca, Honglin Chen & Amanda Baker
2023. Putting it into context. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 46:3 ► pp. 373 ff. DOI logo
Teng, Mark Feng & Atsushi Mizumoto
2023. The role of spoken vocabulary knowledge in language minority students’ incidental vocabulary learning from captioned television. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 46:2 ► pp. 253 ff. DOI logo
Carney, Nathaniel
2021. Diagnosing L2 Listeners’ Difficulty Comprehending Known Lexis. TESOL Quarterly 55:2 ► pp. 536 ff. DOI logo
van Zeeland, Hilde
2017. Christopher Brumfit Thesis Award Winner 2014 – Hilde van Zeeland: Four studies on vocabulary knowledge in and from listening: Findings and implications for future research. Language Teaching 50:1 ► pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Oliver, Rhonda, Honglin Chen & Stephen Moore
2016. Review of selected research in applied linguistics published in Australia (2008–2014). Language Teaching 49:4 ► pp. 513 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue