Cover not available

Article published In: Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 36:1 (2013) ► pp.20–51

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF

Native speaker and nonnative speaker identities in repair practices of English conversation

 | Department of Applied Linguistics, University of California, Los Angeles
 | Department of English Education, Seoul National University
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 1 January 2013
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.36.1.02bae
Within the theoretical and methodological framework of Conversation Analysis, the present study explores the nature of the native speaker (NS) and nonnative speaker (NNS) identities in repair practices of English conversation. It has identified and analyzed in detail repair sequences in the data and has also conducted quantitative analyses in order to investigate the relationship between NS/NNS identities and repair practices. The results show that the categories of NS and NNS identities are social products that are invoked during and through the participants’ ongoing interaction. First of all, the participants did not invariably make their NS/NNS identities relevant to their repair work; specifically, more than half of the repair practices were irrelevant to these identities. Secondly, when the participants’ NS/NNS identities were made relevant to repair, both the NS and the NNS participants initiated repair in order to solve interactional problems that had resulted from the NNS participants’ insufficient linguistic abilities. The participants’ orientation to their NS/NNS identities was frequently triggered by the NNS participants’ repair-initiation while the NS participants invoked these linguistic identities only in a limited range of interactional environments. The findings of this study provide a further empirical basis for arguing the importance of an emic approach to NS-NNS interactions and the potential to learn new vocabulary through repair.
References (65)
Antaki, C., & Widdicombe, S. (Eds.) (1998). Identities in talk. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benwell, B., & Stokoe, E. (2006). Discourse and identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bitchener, J. W. (1999). The negotiation of meaning by advanced ESL learners: The effects of individual learner factors and task type. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, A. (2003). Interview variation and the co-construction of speaking proficiency. Language Testing, 20(1), 1–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carroll, D. (2000). Precision timing in novice-to-novice L2 conversations. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 11(1), 67–110. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Restarts in novice turn beginnings: Disfluencies or interactional achievements? In R. Gardner & J. Wagner (Eds.), Second language conversations (pp. 201–220). London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clayman, S. E., Heritage, J., Elliott, M.N., & McDonald, L. (2007). When does the watchdog bark? Conditions of aggressive questioning in presidential news conferences. American Sociological Review, 72(1), 23–41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drew, P. (1991). Asymmetries of knowledge in conversational interactions. In I. Markova & K. Foppa (Eds.), Asymmetries in dialogue (pp. 29–48). Hemel Hamstead: Harvester/ Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Egbert, M. (2004). Other-initiated repair and membership categorization: Some conversational events that trigger linguistic and regional membership categorization. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(8), 1467–1498. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Egbert, M., Niebecker, L., & Rezzara, S. (2004). Inside first and second language speakers’ trouble in understanding. In R. Gardner & J. Wagner (Eds.), Second language conversations (pp. 178–200). London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Færch, C., Kasper, G. (1983). Plans and strategies in foreign language communication. In C. Færch & G. Kasper (Eds.), Strategies in interlanguage communication (pp. 20–60). London: LongmanGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Firth, A. (1996). The discursive accomplishment of ‘normality’: On lingua franca English and conversation analysis. Journal of Pragmatics, 26(2), 237–259. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (1997). On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. The Modern Language Journal, 81(3), 285–300. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gardner, R., & Wagner, J. (Eds.). (2004). Second language conversations. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gass, S. M., & Varonis, E.M. (1985). Task variation and nonnative/nonnative negotiation of meaning. In S. M. Gass & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 149–161). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
He, A.W. (2004) CA for SLA: Arguments from the Chinese language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 568–582. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, J. (1984). A change of state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures in social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 299–345). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). CA at century’s end: Practices of talk-in-interaction, their distributions and their outcomes. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 321(1–2), 69–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, J., Boyd, E.A., & Kleinman, L. (2001). Subverting criteria: The role of precedent in decisions to finance surgery. Sociology of Health and Illness, 23(5), 701–728. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, J., & Maynard, D.W. (2006). Introduction: Analyzing Interaction between doctors and patients in primary care encounters. In J. Heritage & D. W. Maynard (Eds.), Communication in medical care: Interactional between primary care physicians and patients (pp. 1–21). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hosoda, Y. (2000). Other-repair in Japanese conversation between nonnative and native speakers. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 11(1), 39–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Repair and relevance of differential language expertise in second language conversations. Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 25–50. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kasper, G. (2004). Participant orientation in conversation-for-learning. Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 551–567. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kurhila, S. (2004). Clients or language learners-being a second language speaker in institutional interaction. In R. Gardner & J. Wagner (Eds.), Second language conversations (pp. 58–74). London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lerner, G. H. (1991). On the syntax of sentences in progress. Language in Society, 20(3), 441–458. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). On the place of linguistic resources in the organization of talk-in-interaction: Grammar as action in prompting a speaker to elaborate. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37(2), 151–184. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Loewen, S. (2005). Incidental focus on form and second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(3), 361–386. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Long, M. (1983). Linguistic and conversational adjustments to non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5(2), 177–193. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39–52). Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mangione-Smith, R., Stivers, T., Elliott, M.N., McDonald, L., & Heritage, J. (2003). Online commentaries during the physical examination: A communication tool for avoiding inappropriate prescribing? Social Science and Medicine, 56(2), 313–320. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Markee, N. (2004). Zones of interactional transition in ESL classes. Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 583–596. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Markee, N., & Kasper, G. (2004). Classroom talks: An introduction. Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 491–500. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mori, J. (2004). Negotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities: A case from a Japanese classroom. Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 536–550. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ochs, E., Schegloff, E.A., & Thompson, S.A. (Eds.). (1996). Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Park, J.-E. (2007). Co-construction of nonnative speaker identity in cross-cultural interaction. Applied Linguistics, 28(3), 339–360. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Park, J.-S. (2008). Negative yes/no question-answer sequences in conversation: grammar, action, and sequence organization. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Park, Y.-Y. (2004). Nonnative speakers’ use of yeah in English spoken discourse. Discourse and Cognition, 11(3), 85–105.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pavlenko, A. (2002). Poststructuralist approaches to the study of social factors in second language learning and use. In V. Cook (Ed.), Portraits of the L2 user (pp. 277–302). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2001). Critical applied linguistics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pica, T. (1987). Second language acquisition, social interaction, and the classroom. Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 3–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pica, T., Holliday, L., Lewis, N., & Morgenthaler, L. (1989). Comprehensible output as an outcome of linguistic demands on the learner. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11(1), 63–90. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poulisse, N., & Bongaerts, T. (1990, April). A closer look at the strategy of transfer. Paper presented at the 9th AILA Conference, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Rampton, B. (1995). Crossing: Language and ethnicity among adolescents. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2010). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics (4th ed.). Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richards, K., & Seedhouse, P. (2005). Applying conversation analysis. Houndsmill: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robinson, J., & Heritage, J. (2005). The structure of patients’ presenting concerns: The completion relevance of current symptoms. Social Science and Medicine, 61(2), 481–493. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, H. (1972). An initial investigation of the usability of conversational materials for doing sociology. In D. N. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 31–74). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1988). On an actual virtual servo-mechanism for guessing bad news: A single case conjecture. Social Problems, 35(4), 442–457. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, E.A. (1991) Reflections on talk and social structure. In D. Boden & D. H. Zimmerman (Eds.), Talk and social structure (pp. 44–70). Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1993). Reflections on quantification in the study of conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26(1), 99–128. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1997). Whose text? Whose context? Discourse & Society, 8(2), 165–187. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis (Vol.1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). One perspective on conversation analysis: Comparative perspectives. In J. Sidnell (Ed.), Conversation analysis: comparative perspectives (pp. 357–406). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 362–382. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seedhouse, P. (2004). The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Speer, S. A., & Stokoe, E. (Eds.). (2011). Conversation and gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, T., & Majid, A. (2007). Questioning children: Interactional evidence of implicit bias in medical interviews. Social Psychology Quarterly, 70(4), 424–441. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Svennevig, J. (2008). Trying the easiest solution first in other-initiated repair. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(2), 333–348. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Varonis, E., & S. Gass. (1985). Non-native/non-native conversations: A model for negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 71–90. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Williams, J. (2001). The effectiveness of spontaneous attention to form. System, 29(3), 325–340. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wong, J. (2000a). Delayed next turn repair initiation in native/non-native speaker English conversation. Applied Linguistics, 21(1). 244–267. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000b). The token “yeah” in nonnative speaker English conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33(1), 39–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). Sidestepping grammar. In K. Richards & P. Seedhouse (Eds.), Applying conversation analysis (pp. 159–173). Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wong, J., & Olsher. D. (2000). Reflections on conversation analysis and nonnative speaker talk: An interview with Emanuel A.Schegloff. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 11(1), 111–128. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Aleksius, Madar
2021. Repair Practice in the Classroom Conversations of Indonesian EFL Students. Journal of Language and Education 7:2 ► pp. 10 ff. DOI logo
Alhodithi, Nawal I
2016. Deconstructing the Dichotomy of Native and Non-Native Speakers of English: An Analysis of Current Research. SSRN Electronic Journal DOI logo
Oliver, Rhonda, Honglin Chen & Stephen Moore
2016. Review of selected research in applied linguistics published in Australia (2008–2014). Language Teaching 49:4 ► pp. 513 ff. DOI logo
Rumenapp, Joseph C.
2016. Analyzing discourse analysis: Teachers’ views of classroom discourse and student identity. Linguistics and Education 35 ► pp. 26 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue