Review of Mullan, K. (2010) Expressing Opinions in French and Australian English Discourse: A Semantic and Interactional Analysis

Moore, Erin

doi:10.1075/aral.35.1.08moo

Review published In: Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 35:1 (2012) ► pp.120–123

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download PDF

Book review

Review of Mullan, K. (2010) Expressing Opinions in French and Australian English Discourse: A Semantic and Interactional Analysis

Reviewed by

Erin Moore | School of Languages and Linguistics, University of Melbourne

Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 1 January 2012

https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.35.1.08moo

References (5)

Brinton, L. J. (1996). Pragmatic markers in English: grammaticalization and discourse functions. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Brown, P. & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: some universals in language usage. Cambridge [Cambridgeshire]; New York: Cambridge University Press.

Chafe, W. (1993). Prosodic and functional units of language. In J. A. Edwards & M. D. Lampert, (Eds.), Talking data: transcription and coding in discourse research (pp. 33–43). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Fischer, K. (2006). Frames, constructions, and invariant meanings: the functional polysemy of discourse particles. In K. Fischer, (Ed.), Approaches to discourse particles (1^st ed.) (pp. 427–448). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Kärkkäinen, E. (1982). Epistemic stance in English conversation: a description of its interactional functions, with a focus on I think. Amsterdam/New York: North-Holland Pub. Co./Elsevier Science/John Benjamins.