Review published In: Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 35:1 (2012) ► pp.113–116
Book review
Review of Bednarek, M. (2010) The Language of Fictional Television: Drama a nd Identity
Reviewed by
Neda Chepinchikj | School of Languages and Linguistics, Faculty of Arts, The University of Melbourne
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 1 January 2012
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.35.1.06che
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.35.1.06che
References (4)
Goodwin, M. H. & Goodwin, C. (2000). Emotion within situated activity. Originally published in N. Budwig, I. C. Uzgris & J. V. Wertsch, (Eds.), Communication: An arena for development (pp. 33–54). Stamford, CT: Ablex. Available from [URL].
Mittmann, B. (2006). With a little help from Friends (and others): Lexico-pragmatic characteristics of original and dubbed film dialogue. In C. Houswitschka, G. Knappe & A. Müller, (Eds.), Anglistentag 2005, Bamberg – Proceedings (pp. 573–585). Trier: WVT.
Quaglio, P. (2008). Television dialogue and natural conversation: Linguistic similarities and functional differences. In A. Ädel & R. Reppen, (Eds.), Corpora and discourse. The challenges of different settings (pp. 189–210). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
(2009). Television dialogue. The sitcom Friends vs. natural conversation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.