Article published In: Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 34:1 (2011) ► pp.75–103
‘Ideal-Problem-Solution’ (IPS) Model
A discourse model of Research Article Introductions (RAIS) in education
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 1 January 2011
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.34.1.05adn
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.34.1.05adn
Research article introductions (RAIs) play a significant role in gaining publication, and therefore have been studied by many applied linguists. Research into RAIs published in Indonesia has begun to be developed (Adnan, 2009; Mirahayuni, 2001; Safnil, 2000), and generally conclude that Indonesian Humanities RAIs were structured differently from English RAIs. However, as these are early studies, their findings still awaits scrutiny, and little information on Indonesian RAIs especially in Education has been published. Several models describing discourse structure of research article introductions have been proposed, but they have been problematic when applied to analyse RAIs. This paper reports an examination of the applicability of two important models, the CARS (Swales, 1990) and the PJP model claimed to be an Indonesian model of Humanities RAIs (Safnil, 2000), using a selection of 21 Indonesian research article Introductions (RAIs) written by Indonesian academics in Education. It concentrates on the following questions: To what extent do these models fit the data and why? The examination found that none of the RAIs fit the CARS, and only less than half fit the PJP model for various reasons. Therefore a new model is proposed. This model fits most of the data. The paper claims that apart from national concerns, discourse patterns of RAIs are also affected by writing guides provided by the discipline.
References (22)
Adnan, Z. (2009). Some potential problems for research articles written by Indonesian academics when submitted to international English language Journals. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 11(1), 107–125.
Ahmad, U. K. (1997). Research article introductions in Malay: rhetoric in an emerging research community. In A. Duszak (Ed.), Culture and styles of academic discourse (pp. 273–304). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Australian Research Council. (2009). Linkage projects funding rules. Retrieved March 8, 2009 from [URL].
Connor, U. & Mauranen, A. (1999). Linguistic analysis of grant proposals: European Union research grants. English for Specific Purposes, 181, 47–62.
Creswell, J. (2009). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Los Angeles: Sage.
Golebiowski, Z. (1999). Application of Swales’ model in the analysis of research papers by Polish authors. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 371, 231–247.
Gunnarsson, B.-L., Linell, P. & Nordberg, B. (Eds). (1994). Text and talk in professional contexts. Selected papers from the international conference “Discourse and the Professions”, Uppsala, 26–29 August, 1992. Uppsala: ASLA.
Mas’oed, M. (1983). The economic and political structure during the Early New Order, 1966–71. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Ohio State University, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Mirahayuni, N. K. (2001). Investigating textual structure in native and non-native English research articles: strategy differences between English and Indonesian writers. Unpublished PhD dissertation, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Najjar, H. Y. (1990). Arabic as a Research Language: The Case Study of the Agricultural Sciences. University of Michigan, Ann Arbour.
Nwogu, K. N. (1997). The medical research paper: structure and functions. English for Specific Purposes, 16(2), 119–138.
Richards, J. & Schmidt, R. (2002). Longman dictionary of teaching and applied linguistics (3rd ed.). London: Longman.
Rifai, M. (1995). Pegangan Gaya Penulisan, Penyumtingan dan Penerbitan Karya Ilmiah Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Safnil. (2000). Rhetorical structure analysis of the Indonesian research articles. Unpublished PhD dissertation. The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Samraj, B. (2002). Introductions in research articles: variations across the disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 211, 1–17.
Soemardjan, S. (Ed.) (1994). Culture, development, and democracy: a tribute to Soedjatmoko. Tokyo/New York: United Nations University Press.
Swales, J. (1981). Aspects of research article introductions. Birmingham, UK: Ashton University, the Languages Studies Unit.
(1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Warsidi, Warsidi
Warsidi, Warsidi
Farley, Peter C.
Farley, A. Fay
Adnan, Zifirdaus
2014. Prospects of Indonesian Research Articles (RAs) Being Considered for Publication in ‘Center’ Journals: A Comparative Study of Rhetorical Patterns of RAs in Selected Humanities and Hard Science Disciplines. In Occupying Niches: Interculturality, Cross-culturality and Aculturality in Academic Research [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 79 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.