Article published In: Sociocognitive Approaches to Second Language Pedagogy
Edited by Bronwen Patricia Dyson
[Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 33:3] 2010
► pp. 27.1–27.24
Pair interactions and mode of communication
Comparing face-to-face and computer mediated communication
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 1 January 2010
https://doi.org/10.2104/aral1027
https://doi.org/10.2104/aral1027
In today’s second language classrooms, students are often asked to work in pairs or small groups. Such collaboration can take place face-to-face, but now more often via computer mediated communication. This paper reports on a study which investigated the effect of the medium of communication on the nature of pair interaction. The study involved six pairs of beginner participants in a Chinese class completing seven different tasks. Each task was completed twice, once face to face (FTF), and once via computer mediated communication (CMC). All pair talk was audio recorded, and on-line communication was logged. Using Storch’s (2002) model of patterns of pair interaction, five patterns were identified: collaborative, cooperative, dominant/dominant, dominant/passive and expert/novice. The medium of communication was found to affect the pattern of interaction. In CMC some pairs became more collaborative, or cooperative. The implications of these findings for language teaching, particularly for the use of CMC in language classes, are discussed.
References (31)
Abrams, Zsuzsanna Ittzes. (2003). The effect of synchronous and asynchronous CMC on oral performance in German. Modern Language Journal, 87(2), 157–167.
Aldosari, Ali; Storch, Neomy. (2006, July). Investigating pair work: The role of L1 in social relations across proficiency levels. Paper presented at the Applied Linguistics Association of Australia conference, Brisbane, Australia.
Beauvois, Margaret Healy. (1992). Computer-assisted classroom discussion in the foreign language classroom: Conversation in slow motion. Foreign Language Annals, 25(5), 455–464.
Blake, Robert. (2000). Computer mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning & Technology, 41, 120–136.
Donato, Richard. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf and G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33–56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Firth, Alan; Wagner, Johannes. (1997). On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. Modern Language Journal, 81(3), 285–300.
. (2007). On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in second language acquisition research. Modern Language Journal, 911, 755–770.
Gass, Susan; Varonis, Evangeline. (1986). Sex differences in NNS/NNS interactions. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: conversations in SLA (pp. 327–351). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Ives, Debra. (2004). Three NS-NNS upper primary school pairs. A case study. Australian Language & Literacy Matters. 1(4), 11–16.
Kelm, Orlando. (1992). The use of synchronous and computer-networks in second language instruction: A preliminary report. Foreign Language Annals, 25(5), 441–454.
Kitade, Keiko. (2000). Learners’ discourse and SLA theories in CMC: Collaborative interaction in Internet chat. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13(2), 143–166.
Lantolf, James (2000). Second language learning as a mediated process. Language Teaching, 33, 79–96.
Lantolf, James; Thorne, Steven. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Long, Michael (1983). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 126–141.
. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie and T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of language acquisition (pp. 413–468). New York: Academic Press.
Long, Michael; Porter, Patricia A. (1985). Group work, interlanguage talk, and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 19(2), 207–227.
Mackey, Alison. (1999). Input, interaction, and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 211, 557–587.
Ohta, Amy. (2001). Second language acquisition processes in the classroom: Learning Japanese. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Pica, Theresa; Holliday, Lloyd; Lewis, Nora; Berducci, Dom; Newman, Jeanne. (1991). Language learning through interaction: What role does gender play? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 131, 343–376.
Roed, Jannie. (2003). Language and learner behaviour in a virtual environment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16(2–3), 155–172.
Schmidt, Richard. (1993). Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 131, 206–226.
. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Strauss, Pat; U. Alice. (2007). Group assessments: dilemmas facing lecturers in multicultural tertiary classrooms. Higher Education Research & Development, 26(2), 147–161.
Swain, Merrill. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97–114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Swain, Merrill; Lapkin, Sharon. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 320–337.
Vygotsky, Lev (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Warschauer, Mark. (1996). Comparing face-to-face and electronic communication in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13(2), 7–26.
Watanabe, Yoshinori. (2004). Collaborative dialogue between ESL learners of different proficiency levels: Linguistic and affective outcomes. Unpublished Master thesis, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, The University of Toronto, Canada.
Cited by (48)
Cited by 48 other publications
Calzada, Asier & Agurtzane Azkarai
Azkarai, Agurtzane & Asier Calzada
Hiromori, Tomohito
Liu, Huimin, Tai Wang & Zhiqiang Cai
Liu, Qianqian & Shiyu Zhou
Rostami Darounkola, Elham, Baqer Yaqubi & Fatemeh Khonamri
Almalki, Hanan & Neomy Storch
2023. Online collaborative L2 writing. In L2 Collaborative Writing in Diverse Learning Contexts [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 59], ► pp. 130 ff.
Azkarai, Agurtzane
2023. L1 use and patterns of interaction of young EFL learners in a collaborative writing task. Language Teaching for Young Learners 5:1 ► pp. 7 ff.
Chen, Wenxue, Donghong Liu & Cancan Lin
Hsu, Hsiu-Chen
2023. Peer interaction in collaborative L2 writing across synchronous
and asynchronous CMC modes. In L2 Collaborative Writing in Diverse Learning Contexts [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 59], ► pp. 155 ff.
Hsu, Hsiu-Chen
Li, Mimi & Meixiu Zhang
2023. Introduction. In L2 Collaborative Writing in Diverse Learning Contexts [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 59], ► pp. 1 ff.
Phan, Huong Le Thu & Phung Dao
Tosun, Sibel & Nuray Alagözlü
Zhang, Meixiu & Qi Liu
沈, 少琴
Chaudhuri, Tushar, Renia Lopez-Ozieblo & Valérie Martinez
Kos, Tomas
2022. Exploring same- and different grade peer interactions among EFL young learners. Journal of Second Language Studies 5:2 ► pp. 307 ff.
Cerezo, Luis
DAO, PHUNG, MAI XUAN NHAT CHI NGUYEN, PHUONG–THAO DUONG & VU TRAN–THANH
Jiang, Dayu, Slava Kalyuga & John Sweller
Pladevall-Ballester, Elisabet
2021. Pair dynamics and language-related episodes in child EFL task-based peer interaction. Language Teaching for Young Learners 3:2 ► pp. 189 ff.
Azkarai, Agurtzane, María del Pilar García Mayo & Rhonda Oliver
2020. The effect of task repetition on the patterns of interaction of ESL children. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 171:1 ► pp. 90 ff.
Hirci, Nataša & Agnes Pisanski Peterlin
Stiefenhöfer, Laura & Marije Michel
2020. Investigating the relationship between peer interaction and writing processes in computer-supported collaborative
L2 writing. In Writing and Language Learning [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 56], ► pp. 255 ff.
Zhai, Mengying
2020. Peer-interaction patterns in a Chinese as a foreign language pair writing task. Chinese as a Second Language (漢語教學研究—美國中文教師學會學報). The journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, USA 55:2 ► pp. 133 ff.
Kato, Yoshitaka & David Dalsky
Oliver, Rhonda & Agurtzane Azkarai
2019. Patterns of interaction and young ESL learners. Language Teaching for Young Learners 1:1 ► pp. 82 ff.
Johnston, Kris Pierre & Geoff Lawrence
Johnston, Kris Pierre & Geoff Lawrence
Walls, Laura C.
Andrews, Jessica J., Deirdre Kerr, Robert J. Mislevy, Alina von Davier, Jiangang Hao & Lei Liu
Cho, Hyeyoon
Chen, Wenxue
García Mayo, Maria del Pilar & Ainara Imaz Agirre
Oliver, Rhonda, Honglin Chen & Stephen Moore
Rouhshad, Amir & Neomy Storch
2016. 10. A focus on mode. In Peer Interaction and Second Language Learning [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 45], ► pp. 267 ff.
Zohreh Zafarani & Parviz Maftoon
Edstrom, Anne
Butler, Yuko Goto & Wei Zeng
Butler, Yuko Goto & Wei Zeng
Aw-Yong, Jennifer, Neil Anderson & Philemon Chigeza
Wigglesworth, Gillian & Neomy Storch
Storch, Neomy
Storch, Neomy
Storch, Neomy
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.