Cover not available

Article published In: Sociocognitive Approaches to Second Language Pedagogy
Edited by Bronwen Patricia Dyson
[Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 33:3] 2010
► pp. 26.1–26.22

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF

The provision and uptake of different types of recasts in child and adult ESL learners

What is the role of age and context?

 | Edith Cowan University
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 1 January 2010
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.2104/aral1026
The role of conversational interaction in second language research has increasingly been seen as playing a facilitative role in second language learning. As such there have been a number of studies focussing on different types of interaction, including feedback such as recasts, and their potential role in second language learning. In this study, using Sheen’s (2006) taxonomy, we compare various types of recasts delivered to child ESL learners. Further, we examine two variables: context (teacher-fronted classrooms versus pair work, including NNS-NNS and NNS-NS dyads) and age (the results of this study with children are compared with the results from Sheen’s (2006) study of adults) and the impact these factors have on this form of feedback. We also examine the opportunity for, and the actual uptake that may follow these recasts, for child ESL learners. The findings suggest that age and context make a difference, both in relation to the provision of recasts (in terms of their type and characteristics), as well as in relation to their uptake, though to a lesser extent. Context also influences the opportunity for uptake afforded to child learners. The theoretical and pedagogical implications of these results are outlined at the conclusion of this paper.
References (23)
Braidi, Susan. (2002). Reexamining the role of recasts in native-speaker/nonnative-speaker interactions. Language Learning, 52(1), 1–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Doughty, Catherine; Varela, Evangeline Marlos. (1998). Communicative focus on form. In Catherine Doughty and Jessica Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 114–138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dulay, Heidi; Burt, Marina; Krashen, Stephen D. (1982). Language two. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, Rod; Sheen, Younghee. (2006). Reexamining the role of recasts in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(4), 575–600. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Farrar, Michael. (1992). Negative evidence and grammatical morpheme acquisition. Developmental Psychology, 28(1), 90–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gass, Susan M.; Varonis, Evangeline Marlos. (1994). Input, interaction and second language production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16(2), 283–302. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iwashita, Noriko. (2003). Negative feedback and positive evidence in task-based interaction: Differential effects of L2 development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25(1), 1–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leeman, Jennifer. (2003). Recasts and second language development: Beyond negative evidence. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25(1), 37–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Long, Michael H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In William C. Ritchie and Tej K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyster, Roy. (1998a). Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning, 481, 183–218. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1998b). Recasts, repetition, and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20(1), 51–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyster, Roy; Ranta, Leila. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 191, 37–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mackey, Alison. (1999). Input, interaction and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(4), 557–587. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mackey, Alison; Oliver, Rhonda; Leeman, Jennifer. (2003). Interactional input and the incorporation of feedback: An exploration of NS-NNS and NSS-NNS and child dyads. Language Learning, 53(1), 35–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mackey, Alison; Philp, Jenefer. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts. Modern Language Journal, 821, 338–356. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nicholas, Howard; Lightbown, Patsy M; Spada, Nina. (2001). Recasts as feedback to language learners. Language Learning, 51(4), 719–758. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oliver, Rhonda. (1995). Negative feedback in child NNS-NS conversation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(4), 459–481. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2000). Age difference in negotiation and feedback in classroom and pair work. Language Learning, 50(1), 119–151. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oliver, Rhonda; Mackey, Alison. (2003). Interactional context and feedback in child ESL classrooms. The Modern Language Journal, 87(4), 519–533. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Philp, Jenefer. (2003). Constraints on ‘noticing the gap’: Non-native speakers’ noticing of recasts in NS-NNS interactions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25(1), 99–126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, Michael A. (1995). Awareness and the efficacy of error correction. In Richard Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 163–182). Honolulu, HA: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sheen, Younghee. (2004). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicative classrooms across instructional settings. Language Teaching Research, 8(3), 263–300. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2006). Exploring the relationship between characteristics of recasts and learner uptake. Language Teaching Research, 10(4), 361–392. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (12)

Cited by 12 other publications

Kamiya, Nobuhiro
2025. What characteristics of recasts facilitate accurate perception when overheard by true beginners?. Language Teaching Research 29:1 ► pp. 416 ff. DOI logo
Kim, Taesung & George EK Whitehead
2025. Metacognitive Instruction and Oral Corrective Feedback: Impacts on Metacognitive Awareness and Speaking Accuracy in Learners of English as a Foreign Language. RELC Journal DOI logo
Oliver, Rhonda & Tatiana Bogachenko
2024. Task-based language learning and teaching. In Individual Differences and Task-Based Language Teaching [Task-Based Language Teaching, 16], ► pp. 262 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Yibei & Danli Li
2022. Translanguaging pedagogy in tutor’s oral corrective feedback on chinese EFL learners’ argumentative writing. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education 7:1 DOI logo
Martínez-Adrián, María, M. Juncal Gutiérrez-Mangado, Francisco Gallardo-del-Puerto & María Basterrechea
2021. Language-related episodes by young CLIL learners. Language Teaching for Young Learners 3:2 ► pp. 214 ff. DOI logo
Mayo, Maria del Pilar García & Ruth Milla
2021. Corrective Feedback in Second versus Foreign Language Contexts. In The Cambridge Handbook of Corrective Feedback in Second Language Learning and Teaching, ► pp. 473 ff. DOI logo
Oliver, Rhonda & Rebecca Adams
2021. Oral Corrective Feedback. In The Cambridge Handbook of Corrective Feedback in Second Language Learning and Teaching, ► pp. 187 ff. DOI logo
Luquin, María & María del Pilar García Mayo
2020. Collaborative writing and feedback. Language Teaching for Young Learners 2:1 ► pp. 73 ff. DOI logo
Philp, Jenefer & Laura Gurzynski-Weiss
2020. On the role of the interlocutor in second language development. In Cross-theoretical Explorations of Interlocutors and Their Individual Differences [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 53], ► pp. 19 ff. DOI logo
Sato, Masatoshi & Shawn Loewen
2018. Metacognitive Instruction Enhances the Effectiveness of Corrective Feedback: Variable Effects of Feedback Types and Linguistic Targets. Language Learning 68:2 ► pp. 507 ff. DOI logo
Oliver, Rhonda & Agurtzane Azkarai
2017. Review of Child Second Language Acquisition (SLA): Examining Theories and Research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 37 ► pp. 62 ff. DOI logo
Oliver, Rhonda, Honglin Chen & Stephen Moore
2016. Review of selected research in applied linguistics published in Australia (2008–2014). Language Teaching 49:4 ► pp. 513 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue