Article published In: Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 32:3 (2009) ► pp.25.1–25.16
Planes, politics and oral proficiency
Testing international air traffic controllers
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 1 January 2009
https://doi.org/10.2104/aral0925
https://doi.org/10.2104/aral0925
This study investigates the variation in oral proficiency demonstrated by 14 Air Traffic Controllers across two types of testing tasks: work-related radio telephony-based tasks and non-specific English tasks on aviation topics. Their performance was compared statistically in terms of level ratings on the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) scale. The results demonstrate significant differences in the performance of the test-takers across task types, differences that were not fully predictable across subjects. The differences between general English proficiency and specific purpose proficiency were even greater than those we would expect for other LSP situations. We discuss the implications of these findings for fairly and safely assessing Aviation English using ICAO standards in a politicized context.
References (14)
Alderson, J. Charles (2009). Air safety, language assessment policy, and policy implementation: The case of Aviation English. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 291, 168–187.
Brindley, Geoff (2001). Outcomes based assessment in practice: Some examples and emerging insights. Language Testing, 18(4), 393–407.
Douglas, Dan (2000). Assessing Languages for Specific Purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) (2004). Manual on the implementation of ICAO Language Proficiency Requirements. Montreal: Author.
International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) FLS. n.d. Flight Safety Section. Personnel Licensing. Frequently Asked Questions. Accessed June 9, 2009. Available from: [URL].
McNamara, Tim; Roever, Carsten (2006). Language Testing: The Social Dimension. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Mell, Jeremy (2004). Language training and testing in aviation need to focus on job-specific competencies. ICAO Journal, 59(1), 12–14, 27.
Mitsutomi, Marjo; O’Brien, Kathleen. (2004). Fundamental aviation language issues addressed by new proficiency requirements. ICAO Journal, 59(1), 7–9, 26–27.
Neville, Maurice (2004). Beyond the Black Box: Talk in Interaction in the Airline Cockpit. Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
Teasdale, Alex (1996). Content validity in tests for well-defined LSP domains: An approach to defining what is to be tested. In Milanovic, M. and Saville, N. (Eds.), Performance Testing, Cognition and Assessment: Selected Papers from the 15th Language Testing Research Colloquium, pp. 211–230. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cited by (12)
Cited by 12 other publications
Silva, Ana Lígia Barbosa de Carvalho e
Treadaway, Maria & John Read
Yin, Yan, Guoxing Yu & Dayong Huang
Zhao, Wen
Drayton, Jenny & Averil Coxhead
Rahmati, Massoud & Siros Izadpanah
Kim, Hyejeong
Cox, Troy L., Jennifer Bown & Jacob Burdis
Kim, Hyejeong & Catherine Elder
Knoch, Ute
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.