Article published In: Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 32:1 (2009) ► pp.3.1–3.20
Effects of learner background on the development of writing skills in Japanese as a second language
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 1 January 2009
https://doi.org/10.2104/aral0903
https://doi.org/10.2104/aral0903
The paper presents preliminary findings of a project which investigated whether learner background, in terms of instruction mode (i.e., school or intensive first-year course at university) and first language (i.e., character based or non-character based), has an impact on the development of writing skills in Japanese as a second language (JSL). Many students in second-year Japanese at university are post-secondary (i.e., they completed Year 12 Japanese at school). They are in class with students who started Japanese at university (i.e., are post-beginners). The intensity of instruction that the two groups have received is very different. A large number of the students learning Japanese at tertiary institutions in Australia are also native speakers of character-based languages (e.g., Chinese). Although there is a substantial volume of studies comparing the effects of instruction mode on L2 development, little is known of how instruction mode and L1 background together may affect L2 development in adult L2 learning settings. The data for the present study include writing samples collected on two occasions from 34 students from a variety of backgrounds. The samples were analysed in terms of length, grammatical complexity and schematic structures, use of kanji (Chinese characters), and vocabulary. The results were compared in terms of study experience and first language. In general, the performance of post-beginner learners from character-based language backgrounds was higher on kanji use and a few other areas, but their superior performance was derived from the interaction of two background factors (L1 and study background). The results show complexity in how different backgrounds affect L2 writing task performance. The study has strong pedagogical implications for teaching a character-based language to students from diverse study backgrounds.
References (20)
Amlund, J. T.; Kardash, C. A. M.; Kulhavy, R. W. (1986). Repetitive reading and recall of expository texts. Reading Research Quarterly 211, 49–58.
Brown, A.; Iwashita, N. (1996). Language background and item difficulty: The development of a computer-adaptive test of Japanese System 24(2), 199–206.
(1998). The role of language background in the validation of a computer-adaptive test. In Kunnan, A. (ed.), Issues in language testing research: Conventional validity and beyond (pp. 195–207). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Collins, L.; Halter, R. H.; Lightbown, P.; Spada, N. (1999). Time and the distribution of time in L2 instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 33(4), 655–680.
Cumming, A. (1990). Expertise in evaluating second language compositions. Language Testing, 7(1), 31–51.
Dempster, F. N. (1987). Effects of encoding and spaced presentations on vocabulary learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 781, 162–170.
(1991). Synthesis of research on reviews and tests. Journal of Educational Leadership, 48(7), 71–76.
(1996). Distributing and managing the conditions of encoding and practice. In E. L. Bjork & R. A. Bjork (eds), Memory (pp. 317–344). San Diego: Academic Press.
Fromkin, V.; Rodman, R.; Collins, P.; Blair, D. (1990). An introduction to language: Second Australian edition. Sydney: Rolt, Rinehart and Winston.
Gamage, G. H. (2003). Perceptions of kanji learning strategies: Do they differ among Chinese character and alphabetic background learners? Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 26(2), 17–30.
Iwashita, N.; Liem, I. (2005). Factors affecting second language achievement in primary school. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 25(1), 36–51.
Koda, K.; Takahashi, E.; Fender, M. (1998). Effects of L1 processing experience on L2 morphological awareness. Ilha do Desterro, 351, 59–87.
Lapkin, S.; Hart, D.; Harley, B. (1998). Case study of compact core French models: Attitudes and achievement. In S. Lapkin (ed.), French second language education in Canada: Empirical studies (pp. 3–30). Toronto and Buffalo: University of Toronto Press.
Lightbown, P. M. (1989). Intensive ESL Programmes in Quebec Primary Schools. TESL Canada Journal, 7(1), 11–32.
Lightbown, P. M.; Spada, N. (1991). Étude des effets à long terme de l’apprentissage intensif de l’anglais language seconde, au primaire. Canadian Modern Language Review, 48(1), 90–117.
MacWhinney, B. (1995). The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk [2nd edition.] Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
McNamara, T.; Hill, K.; Iwashita, N. (2002). Evaluation of the enhanced mode Japanese language program draft final report for 2001. Language Testing Research Centre, The University of Melbourne.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Wei, Xing
Oliver, Rhonda, Honglin Chen & Stephen Moore
Paxton, Simon & Chavalin Svetanant
Tsukada, Kimiko
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
