Article published In: Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 31:1 (2008) ► pp.3.1–3.20
Examining negotiation in peer group oral assessment
What are the implications?
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 1 January 2008
https://doi.org/10.2104/aral0803
https://doi.org/10.2104/aral0803
This article reports on a case study of negotiation that occurred in peer group oral interactions under assessment conditions. Discourse analysis was used to illustrate how participants negotiated and co-constructed the assessment format itself as well as meaning exchange sequences. Analyses of the data point to the advantage of using peer group discussion task in generating the interaction patterns representative of natural conversational situations. By concentrating on the situated dynamics and process of peer group functioning, this study also demonstrates the importance of peer learning opportunities that resulted from collaborative reasoning under assessment conditions, which have typically been ignored in the conventional testing paradigm. Implications of these findings over validity issues in oral language assessment are discussed.
References (53)
Atkinson, J. M.; Heritage, J. (Eds.). (1984). Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bachman, L. F.; Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bannink, A. (2002). Negotiating the paradoxes of spontaneous talk in advanced L2 classes. In Kramsch, C. (Ed.). Language Acquisition and Language Socialization. 266–288. London: Continuum.
Black, P. (2001). Formative assessment and curriculum consequences. In Scott, D. (Ed.). Curriculum and assessment. 7–23. Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.
Brouwer, C.; Wagner, J. (2004). Developmental issues in second language conversation. Journal of Applied Linguistics 1, 29–47.
Brown, A. (2004). Discourse analysis and the oral interview: Competence or performance? In Boxer, D.; Cohen, A. D. (Eds.). Studying speaking to inform second language learning, 253–282. NY: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
Brown, G.; Anderson, A.; Shillcock, R.; Yule, G. (1984). Teaching talk: strategies for production and assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Canale, M.; Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics 1, 1–47.
Chalhoub-Deville, M. (2003). Second language interaction: Current perspectives and future trends. Language Testing 20, 369–383.
Davison, C. (2007). Views from the chalkface: English language school-based assessment in Hong Kong. Language Assessment Quarterly 4, 37–68.
Drew, P.; Heritage, J. (1992). Talk at work: interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Filipi, A. (1994). Interaction in an Italian oral test: The role of some expansion sequence. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 11, 119–136.
Foster, P.; Ohta, A. S. (2005). Negotiation for meaning and peer assistance in second language classrooms. Applied linguistics 26, 402–430.
Halliday, M. A. K.; Hasan, R. (1989). Language, context and text: A social semiotic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
He, L.; Dai, Y. (2006). A corpus-based investigation into the validity of the CET–SET group discussion. Language Testing 23, 370–401.
Iwashita, N. (1999). The validity of the paired interview format in oral performance assessment. Melboune Papers in Language Testing 8, 51–66.
Johnson, M.; Tyler, A. (1998). Re-analyzing the OPI: How much does it look like natural conversation?’ In Young, R.; He, A. (Eds.). Talking and testing: Discourse approaches to the assessment of oral proficiency, 27–51. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Katona, L. (1998). Meaning negotiation in the Hungarian Oral Proficiency Examination. In Young, R.; He, A. (Eds.). Talking and testing: Discourse approaches to the assessment of oral proficiency, 239–267. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Lazaraton, A. (2002). A qualitative approach to the validation of oral language tests. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Leung, C.; Mohan, B. (2004). Teacher formative assessment and talk in classroom contexts – assessment as discourse and assessment of discourse. Language Testing 20, 335–359.
Long, M. (1985). Input and second language acquisition theory. In Gass, S.; Madden, C. (Eds.). Input and second language acquisition, 377–393. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
(1996). The role of linguistic environment in second language acquisition’. In Richie, W. C.; Bhatia, T. K. (Eds.). Handbook of second language acquisition, 413–468. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
McNamara, T. (1997). ‘Interaction’ in second language performance assessment: Whose performance? Applied Linguistics 181: 446–466.
McNamara, T.; Hill, K.; May, L. (2002). Discourse and assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 22, 221–242.
Mercer, N. (1996). The quality of talk in children’s collaborative activity in the classroom. Learning and instruction 6, 359–377.
Mercer, N.; Wegerif, R. (1999). Is exploratory talk productive talk? In K. Littleton & P. Light (Eds.). Learning with computers: Analyzing productive interaction, 79–101. London: Routledge.
Moder, C.; Halleck, G. (1998). Framing the language proficiency interview as a speech event: Native and non-native speakers’ questions. In Young, R.; He, A. (Eds.). Talking and testing: Discourse approaches to the assessment of oral proficiency, 117–148. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Mori, J. (2004). Pursuit of understanding: Rethinking ‘negotiation of meaning’ in view of projected action. In Gardner, R.; Wagner, J. (Eds.). Second language conversation, 157–177. London: Continuum.
Nakahama, Y.; Tyler, A.; van Lier, L. (2001). Negotiation of meaning in conversational and information gap activities: A comparative discourse analysis. TESOL Quarterly 35, 377–405.
Nassaji, H.; Wells, G. (2000). What’s the use of “Triadic Dialogue”?: An investigation of teacher-student interaction. Applied Linguistics 21, 376–406.
Naughton, D. (2006). Cooperative strategy training and oral interaction: Enhancing small group communication in the language classroom. The Modern Language Journal 90, 169–184.
Ogden, L. (2000). Collaborative tasks, collaborative children: An analysis of reciprocity during peer interaction at Key Stage 1. British Educational Research Journal 26 (2), 211–226.
Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second-language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning 441: 493–527.
Pomerantz, A.; Fehr, B. J. (1997). Conversation analysis: An approach to the study of social action and sense-making practices. In Dijk, T. V. (Ed.). Discourse as a social interaction, 64–91. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Psathas, G. (1995). Conversation analysis – The study of talk-in-interaction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Rea-Dickins, P. (2006). Currents and eddies in the discourse of assessment: A learning-focused interpretation. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 16 (2), 163–188.
Ross, S.; Berwick, R. (1992). The discourse of accommodation in oral proficiency Interviews. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 14, 159–176.
School-Based Assessment Consultancy Team. (2005). 2007 HKCEE English examination: Introduction to the school-based assessment component. Hong Kong: HKEAA.
Schegloff, E. A.; Jefferson, G.; Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53, 361–382.
Schrimshaw, P.; Perkins, G. (1997). Tinker town: Working together. In Wegerif, R.; Schrimshaw, P. (Eds.). Computers and Talk in the Primary Classroom. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
Stansfield, C. W.; Kenyon, D. M. (1992). Research on the comparability of the oral proficiency interview and the simulated oral proficiency interview. System 20, 347–364.
Swain, M. (2001). Examining dialogue: Another approach to content specification and to validating inferences drawn from test scores. Language Testing 18 (3), 275–302.
Tomlinson, B. (2005). Testing to learn: A personal view of language testing. ELT Journal 19 (1), 39–46.
Tudge, J. (2000). Theory, method, and analysis in research on the relations between peer collaboration and cognitive development. Journal of Experimental Education 69, 98–112.
Van Moere, A. (2006). Validity evidence in a university group oral test. Language Testing 23, 411–440.