Cover not available

Review published In: Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 30:1 (2007) ► pp.14.114.5

References (10)
Clark, U. 2005. Social cognition and the future of stylistics, or ‘What is cognitive stylistics and why are people saying such good things about it?!’. Accessed 6 October 2006. Available from: [URL].
Cronquist, U. 2006. ‘Review of Joanna Gavins and Gerard Steen, Cognitive poetics in practice’. Language and Literature 15 (2): 203–208. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gavins, J. 2005. ‘The year’s work in stylistics 2004’. Language and literature 14 (4): 397–409. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. 1985. Introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lecercle, J.-J. 1993. ‘The current state of stylistics.’ The European English messenger 211: 14–18Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
PALA. 2006. The state of stylistics. The Poetics and Linguistics Association PALA. Joensuu, Finland. Accessed 6 October 2006. Available from: [URL]
Pope, R. 2005. ‘The return of creativity: Common, singular and otherwise’. Language and literature 1441: 376–390. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Short, M. 2006. Stylistics website. Lancaster: Lancaster University. Accessed 6 October 2006. Available from: [URL].
Stockwell, P. 2005. ‘Texture and identification’. European Journal of English Studies 9 (2) August: 143–154. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tucker, D. 2001. Embodied meaning: An evolutionary-developmental analysis of adaptive semantics. University of Oregon, Electrical Geodesics Inc. Institute of Cognitive and Decision Sciences.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue