Community languages and LOTE provision in Victorian primary schools: Mix or match?

Slaughter, Yvette; Hajek, John

doi:10.2104/aral0707

Article published In: Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 30:1 (2007) ► pp.7.1–7.22

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download PDF

Community languages and LOTE provision in Victorian primary schools

Mix or match?

Yvette Slaughter | University of Melbourne

John Hajek | University of Melbourne

Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 1 January 2007

https://doi.org/10.2104/aral0707

Primary school languages education continues to be a challenging issue for all states in Australia. In Victoria, LOTE study is provided at the primary level to address the needs of linguistically diverse communities, as well as to provide an enriching learning experience for monolingual speakers of English. The challenge remains to ensure that programs that are run are effective, address the needs of the community and are embraced as a valuable and enriching component of the school curriculum. This study looks at the provision of LOTE in 2003 in Victorian primary schools and in particular, through an analysis of the geographical location of community groups and primary LOTE programs, how effectively community needs are being met. We also analyse the nature of LOTE programs through an examination of teachers’ qualifications, time allotment and program type. Factors identified by some schools as impinging on LOTE study at the primary level, such as literacy concerns and multilingual diversity, will also be examined.

References (18)

Candelier, M. (Ed.). 2004. Janua Linguarum: The gateway to languages. The introduction of language awareness into the curriculum. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.

Clyne, M. 2005. Australia’s language potential. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.

Clyne, M.; Jenkins, C.; Chen, I.; Tsokalidou, R.; Wallner, T. 1995. Developing second language from primary school: Models and outcomes. Deakin. ACT: N.L.L.I.A.

Clyne, M; Kipp, S. 2002. ‘Australia’s changing language demography’. People and place 10 (3): 29–35.

D’Fazio, A. 1974. ‘A language communication course for junior high school’. Babel, April, 20.

EREBUS Consulting Partners. 2002. Review of the Commonwealth Languages Other Than English Programme. Canberra: Department of Education, Science and Training.

Johnstone, R. 1994. Teaching modern foreign languages at primary school. Edinburgh: The Scottish Council for Research in Education.

MCEETYA. 2005. National statement for languages education in Australian schools. Canberra. Department of Education and Children’s Services.

Nicholas, H. 1993. Languages at the crossroads: The report of the national enquiry into the employment and supply of teachers of languages other than English (Australia). East Melbourne, VIC: N.L.L.I.A.

Nostrand, H.L. 1991. ‘Basic intercultural education needs breadth and depth: The role of a second language’. In E. Silber (Ed.), Critical issues in foreign language instruction. New York: Garland Publishing.

Ozolins, U. 1993. The politics of language in Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sharpe, K. 2001. Modern foreign languages in the primary school. London: Kogan Page.

Victoria. Department of Education and Training. 1999. Languages Other Than English in government schools, 1998. Melbourne: Victoria. DE&T. Retrieved 12th November, 2003, from [URL].

. 2005. Languages Other Than English in government schools, 2003. Melbourne: DE&T.

. 2006. Curriculum planning guidelines: Phase 1: Understanding the context. Victoria. DE&T. Retrieved 15th May, 2006, from [URL].

Victoria. Directorate of School Education, and Victoria. Ministerial Advisory Council on Languages Other Than English. 1993. Languages Other Than English strategy plan. Melbourne: Directorate of School Education, Victoria. Ministerial Advisory Council on Languages Other Than English.

Vilke, M. 1988. ‘Some psychological aspects of early second-language acquisition’. Journal of multilingual and multicultural development 9 (1&2): 115–128.

Yellard, G; Pollard, J; Mercuri, A. 1993. ‘The metalinguistic benefits of limited contact with a second language’. Applied psycholinguistics 141: 423–444.

Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Order by:

O'Mara, Ben & Gemma Carey

2019. Do multilingual androids dream of a better life in Australia? Effectiveness of information technology for government translation to support refugees and migrants in Australia. Australian Journal of Public Administration 78:3 ► pp. 449 ff.

Scarino, Angela

2016. A Reconsideration of the Distinctive Role of Heritage Languages in Languages Education in Australia. In Handbook of Comparative Studies on Community Colleges and Global Counterparts [Springer International Handbooks of Education, ], ► pp. 1 ff.

Willoughby, Louisa

2014. Meeting the challenges of heritage language education: lessons from one school community. Current Issues in Language Planning 15:3 ► pp. 265 ff.

Willoughby, Louisa

2016. The Victorian School of Languages as a Model for Heritage Language Education. In Handbook of Comparative Studies on Community Colleges and Global Counterparts [Springer International Handbooks of Education, ], ► pp. 1 ff.

Willoughby, Louisa

2018. The Victorian School of Languages as a Model for Heritage Language Education. In Handbook of Research and Practice in Heritage Language Education [Springer International Handbooks of Education, ], ► pp. 417 ff.

Turner, Marianne

2013. CLIL in Australia: the importance of context. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 16:4 ► pp. 395 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.