Article published In: Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 3:2 (1980) ► pp.76–89
Reading, readability, and textual functions of comprehension questions
Published online: 1 January 1980
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.3.2.07ger
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.3.2.07ger
Abstract
Questions used in reading comprehension tests have been discussed in terms of the forms they take, the kind of overt response required, and the level of comprehension they evoke. But very little has been said about the kinds of textual functions such questions involve. This paper explores the kinds of textual relations that must be understood in order to respond to various questions.
An understanding of what textual relations must be comprehended has ramifications for both the measurement of reading ability and of readability. The study of readability is concerned with the question: What makes one text more difficult to read (comprehend) than another? Traditionally the assessment of readability level has been based on formal linguistic factors. However, much of the information required for comprehending a written text is not encoded explicitly but is left implicit. It is suggested that implicitness may be a source of reading ease or difficulty.
References (8)
Clymer, T. C. “What is Reading? Some Current Concepts”, in Robinson, H. M. (Ed.). Innovation and Change in Reading Instruction, 67th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education: Part II. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1968.
Elley, Warwick, B. 1975. Assessing the difficulty of Reading Materials: The Noun Frequency Method. Wellington. New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
Goldsweig, B. (Assoc. Ed.). “The Lumpy Nose”, in Sprint, Scope/Skills Book. New York: Scholastic Book Services, 1970.
Halliday, M. A. K. 1977. “Text as Semantic Choice in Social Contexts”. In Dijk, T. van, and Petofi, J. S., (Eds), Grammar and Descriptions, Berlin: W. de Gruyter, RTTI.
