Cover not available

Article published In: Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 29:1 (2006) ► pp.5.1–5.19

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF

The focus group interview

Rising to the challenge in qualitative research methodology

 | Universiti Brunei Darussalam
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 1 January 2006
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.2104/aral0605
This paper explores the possibility of expanding the focus group interview into the field of English as a Second Language (ESL), where this research methodology is yet to be thoroughly explored. Specifically, it aims to challenge popular criticisms about the reliability and validity of the focus group as a qualitative research methodology. It does this by first setting up a list of five main criticisms of the focus group interview drawn from current literature on research methodology within the social sciences and education. Based on transcripts of interactional data gathered from focus group interviews carried out among ESL students in a formal ESL context, it then provides a direct and detailed response to each criticism. The arguments put forward demonstrate that the focus group interview, as a method of data collection, may be particularly relevant in gathering the viewpoints and opinions of participants who have traditionally not been well represented through the more conventional and common methods currently employed in ESL research studies. Furthermore, the paper raises conscious awareness about the potential of the focus group as a viable and verifiable tool in qualitative research methodology.
References (43)
Agar, Michael; MacDonald, James. 1995. ‘Focus groups and ethnography’. Human organization 541: 78–86. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baetens-Beardsmore, Hugo. 1995. ‘Reconciling content acquisition and language acquisition in bilingual classrooms’. Paper presented at the Symposium on bilingualism through the classroom: Strategies and practices, Bandar Seri Begawan: Brunei.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barbour, Rosaline S.; Kitzinger, Jenny, editors. 1999. Developing focus group research: Politics, theory and practice. London: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Basch, Charles E. 1987. ‘Focus group interview: An underutilised research technique for improving theory and practice in health education’. Health education quarterly 141: 411–448. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bellenger, Danny N.; Bernhardt, Kenneth L.; Goldstucker, Jac L.. 1976. ‘Qualitative research techniques: Focus group interviews’. In Qualitative research in marketing, edited by Hayes, Thomas J.; Tathum, Carol B. Chicago: American Marketing Association.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheah, Yin Mee. 1998. ‘The examination culture and its impact on literacy innovations: The case of Singapore’. Language and education 12 (3): 192–209. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, Rod. 1992. ‘Learning to communicate in the classroom’. Studies in second language acquisition 141: 1–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldman, Alfred E.; MacDonald, Susan S.. 1987. The group depth interview: Principles and practice. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gorsuch, Greta J.. 2000. ‘EFL educational policies and education cultures: Influences on teachers’ approval of communicative activities’. TESOL quarterly 34 (4): 675–705. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Green, Judith; Hart, Laura. 1999. ‘The impact of context on data’. In Developing focus group research, edited by Barbour, Rosaline S.; Kitzinger, Jenny. London: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenbaum, Tom L.. 1993. The practical handbook and guide to focus group research. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hammersley, Martyn; Woods, Peter. 1984. Life in school. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hargreaves, David. 1967. Social relations in a secondary school. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heslep, Robert. 2001. ‘Habermas on communication in teaching’. Educational theory 51 (2): 191–207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Janis, Irving L. 1982. Groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, Alan. 1996. ‘It’s good to talk: The focus group and the sociological imagination’. The sociological review 44 (3): 517–538. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kirk, Jerome; Miller, Mark L.. 1986. Reliability and validity of quantitative research. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kitzinger, Jenny. 1994. ‘The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants’. Sociology of health and illness 761: 103–121. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994b. ‘Focus groups: Method or madness’. In Challenge and innovation: Methodological advances in social research on HIV/AIDS, edited by Boulton, Mary. New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kitzinger, Jenny; Farquhar, Clare. 1999. ‘The analytical potential of ‘sensitive moments’ in focus group discussions’. In Developing focus group research, edited by Barbour, Rosaline S.; Kitzinger, Jenny. London: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kitzinger, Jenny; Hunt, Kate. 1993. Evaluation of Edinburgh Council’s zero tolerance campaign. Edinburgh: Edinburgh District Council Women’s Committee.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kramsch, Claire. 1998. Language and culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krueger, Richard A.. 1994. Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krueger, Richard A.; Casey, Mary A.. 2000. Focus groups. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kumaravadivelu, B. 1993. ‘Maximising learning potential in the communicative classroom’. ELT journal 47 (1): 12–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lazaraton, Anne. 2000. ‘Current trends in research methodology and statistics in applied linguistics’. TESOL quarterly 341: 175–181. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Litosseliti, Lia. 2003. Using focus groups in research. London, New York: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Littlewood, William. 1981. Communicative language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mayall, Berry. 1993. ‘Keeping healthy at home and school: It’s my body, so it’s my job’. Sociology of health and illness 151: 464–487. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Michell, Lynn. 1999. ‘Combining focus groups and interviews: Telling how it is; telling how it feels’. In Developing focus group research, edited by Barbour, Rosaline S.; Kitzinger, Jenny. London: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, David; Kitzinger, Jenny; Williams, Kevin; Beharrell, Peter. 1998. The circuit of mass communication, London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morgan, David L. 1993. Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1996. ‘Focus groups’. Annual review of sociology 221: 129–152. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1997. Focus groups as qualitative research. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nunan, David. 1987. ‘Communicative language teaching: Making it work’. ELT journal 41(2): 136–145. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seedhouse, Paul. 2005. ‘“Task” as research construct’. Language learning 55 (3): 533–570. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stewart, David W.; Shamdasani, Prem N.. 1990. Focus groups: Theory and practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strauss, Anselm; Corbin, Juliet. 1990. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory and procedures and techniques. Newbury Park CA: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sussman, Steven; Burton, Dee; Dent, Clyde; Stacy, Alan; Flay, Brian. 1991. ‘Use of focus groups in developing an adolescent tobacco use cessation program: Collective norm effects’. Journal of applied social psychology 211: 1772–1782. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Lier, Leo. 1988. The classroom and the language learner. New York: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vaughn, Sharon; Schumm, Jeanne; Sinagub, Jane. 1996. Focus group interviews in education and psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Williams, Kayleen. 2001. ‘Towards a rationale for foreign language education: Restating my reservations’. Australian language learning 241: 43–47. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Willis, Paul. 1977. Learning to labour. London: Gower Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (46)

Cited by 46 other publications

Briffett Aktaş, Carla, Koon Lin Wong, Wing Fun Oliver Kong & Choi Pat Ho
2025. The student voice for social justice pedagogical method. Teaching in Higher Education 30:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
López-Pérez, Laura & Mayra Ortiz Ocaña
2025. Using Focus Groups for Process Tracing: Leveraging Group Discussions for Causal Inference. Sociological Methods & Research DOI logo
Sapkota, Tara
2025. Teachers’, principals’ and university-based teacher educators’ multiple conceptions of teachers’ professional development. Frontiers in Education 10 DOI logo
Ahmed, Naseer, Samiya Aziz, Rizwan Jouhar, Muneeba Rehmat, Afsheen Maqsood, Resham Nadeem, Laraib Magsi & Artak Heboyan
2024. Analysis of satisfaction levels and perceptions of clinical competency: a mixed method study on objective structured clinical examinations in undergraduate dental students. BMC Medical Education 24:1 DOI logo
De Wilde, Vanessa
2024. Can novice teachers detect AI-generated texts in EFL writing?. ELT Journal 78:4 ► pp. 414 ff. DOI logo
El-Hamamsy, Laila, Emilie-Charlotte Monnier, Sunny Avry, Frédérique Chessel-Lazzarotto, Grégory Liégeois, Barbara Bruno, Jessica Dehler Zufferey & Francesco Mondada
2024. An adapted cascade model to scale primary school digital education curricular reforms and teacher professional development programs. Education and Information Technologies 29:9 ► pp. 10391 ff. DOI logo
Naigaga, Desire Alice, Jennifer Kavanagh, Ailbhe Spillane, Laura Hickey, Katherine Scott, Janis Morrissey, Shandell Elmer, Hannah Goss & Celine Murrin
2024. Using co-design to develop the Adolescent Health Literacy Questionnaire for adolescents in Ireland. Health Promotion International 39:1 DOI logo
Namaalwa, Betty, Josephine Bweyale & Oscar Mugula
2024. The Stakeholders’ Views on Assessment of Competence-Based Curriculum (CBC) In Selected Secondary Schools in Kampala District. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) ► pp. 116 ff. DOI logo
Ntombela, Khululiwe Primrose, Margaret Angula, Igshaan Samuels, Clement Cupido, Melvin Swarts, Ewaldine Menjono-Katjizeu, Emilia Inman & Jesaya Nakanyala
2024. Pastoral coping and adaptive management strategies to climate change in communal areas in Namibia and South Africa. Pastoralism: Research, Policy and Practice 14 DOI logo
PUNAR ÖZÇELİK, Nermin & Gonca EKŞİ
2024. A Research into the Effect of Augmented Reality-Enhanced Storybook Reading on EFL Learners. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 24:1 ► pp. 20 ff. DOI logo
Sharma, Shweta
2024. Exploring children’s negotiation of meanings about “D” in 2D and 3D shapes in a year 5/6 New Zealand primary classroom. Mathematics Education Research Journal 36:2 ► pp. 259 ff. DOI logo
Shen, Bin, Zhijie Wang, Xiaowen Zhong, Michael Yi-Chao Jiang & Morris Siu-Yung Jong
2024. Can SVVR Help with Student Engagement in an Online EFL Writing Class? A Chinese Case Study. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher 33:4 ► pp. 1011 ff. DOI logo
Arndt, Henriette L.
2023. Construction and validation of a questionnaire to study engagement in informal second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 45:5 ► pp. 1456 ff. DOI logo
Carlsson, Hanna, Fredrik Hanell & Lisa Engström
2023. Revisiting the notion of the public library as a meeting place: challenges to the mission of promoting democracy in times of political turmoil. Journal of Documentation 79:7 ► pp. 178 ff. DOI logo
Li, Xueru
2023. Developing EFL Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices in Relation to Learner Autonomy Through Online Teacher Development Workshops. Sage Open 13:4 DOI logo
Monnier, Emilie-Charlotte, Sunny Avry, Laila El-Hamamsy, Caroline Pulfrey, Christiane Caneva, Francesco Mondada & Jessica Dehler Zufferey
2023. From teacher to teacher-trainer: A qualitative study exploring factors contributing to a successful train-the-trainer digital education program. Social Sciences & Humanities Open 8:1 ► pp. 100518 ff. DOI logo
Yuan, Rui, Xuyan Qiu, Chuang Wang & Tiefu Zhang
2023. Students’ attitudes toward language learning and use in English-medium instruction (EMI) environments: a mixed methods study. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Girdzijauskienė, Rūta, Aida Norvilienė, Gražina Šmitienė & Liudmila Rupšienė
2022. Strengthening Student Engagement in Learning Through Use of Digital Tools. Acta Paedagogica Vilnensia 49 ► pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Xia, Lily L L, Joyce L C Ma, Monica L T Yau-Ng & Cindy Yan-Yee Yiu
2022. An interactive process model of knowledge transfer for social work through university–agency collaboration: Subjective experiences of the agency social workers in Hong Kong. The British Journal of Social Work 52:7 ► pp. 4318 ff. DOI logo
Adams, Chithra, Anthony Lobianco, Emily Moseley & Calisa Fitzpatrick
2021. Understanding the impact of isolation due to COVID-19 on employment for Kentuckians with spinal cord injuries. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation 54:1 ► pp. 43 ff. DOI logo
Lee, Tim S.O. & Daniel H.Y. Pun
2021. The feasibility of motivational strategies in language classrooms: A tentative teacher-oriented definition. Teaching and Teacher Education 106 ► pp. 103470 ff. DOI logo
Philip, Bridgit, Lynn Kemp, Christine Taylor & Virginia Schmied
2021. ‘We Do Not Talk About It’ – Exploring Visual Approaches to Initiate Deeper Conversations About Perinatal Mental Health With Indian Immigrants. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 20 DOI logo
Hiscock, Claire
2020. International Student Voices and the VLE. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching 10:3 ► pp. 16 ff. DOI logo
Shasha, Ziphozakhe Theophilus, Yong Geng, Hua-ping Sun, Walter Musakwa & Lu Sun
2020. Past, current, and future perspectives on eco-tourism: a bibliometric review between 2001 and 2018. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 27:19 ► pp. 23514 ff. DOI logo
Girsh, Yaron
2019. Negotiating the Uniform: Youth Attitudes towards Military Service in Israel. YOUNG 27:3 ► pp. 304 ff. DOI logo
Nicholls, Claire D
2019. Innovating the Craft of Phenomenological Research Methods Through Mindfulness. Methodological Innovations 12:2 DOI logo
Burri, Michael, Amanda Baker & Honglin Chen
2018. Establishing a framework for learning to teach English pronunciation in an Australian TESOL program. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 41:3 ► pp. 307 ff. DOI logo
Prior, Matthew T.
2018. Interviews and Focus Groups. In The Palgrave Handbook of Applied Linguistics Research Methodology, ► pp. 225 ff. DOI logo
Githaiga, Jennifer Nyawira & Leslie Swartz
2017. Socio-cultural contexts of end- of- life conversations and decisions: bereaved family cancer caregivers’ retrospective co-constructions. BMC Palliative Care 16:1 DOI logo
Sandberg, Anette, Stig Broström, Inge Johansson, Thorleif Frøkjær, Christa Kieferle, Anja Seifert, Angela Roth, Maire Tuul, Aino Ugaste & Meeli Laan
2017. Children’s Perspective on Learning: An International Study in Denmark, Estonia, Germany and Sweden. Early Childhood Education Journal 45:1 ► pp. 71 ff. DOI logo
Wood, Denise
2017. Smart Girls in the Media: The Impact of Popular Culture on the Development of Adolescent Rural Gifted Girls’ Identity and Subsequent Talent Development. In Giftedness and Talent, ► pp. 305 ff. DOI logo
Pedersen, Birgith, Charlotte Delmar, Ursula Falkmer & Mette Grønkjær
2016. Bridging the gap between interviewer and interviewee: developing an interview guide for individual interviews by means of a focus group. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 30:3 ► pp. 631 ff. DOI logo
Tachine, Amanda R., Eliza Yellow Bird & Nolan L. Cabrera
2016. Sharing Circles. International Review of Qualitative Research 9:3 ► pp. 277 ff. DOI logo
Yunos, Zahri, Ramona Susanty Ab Hamid & Mustaffa Ahmad
2016. 2016 SAI Computing Conference (SAI), ► pp. 1063 ff. DOI logo
Johnson, Martin, Sanjana Mehta & Nicky Rushton
2015. Assessment, aim and actuality: insights from teachers in England about the validity of a new language assessment model. Pedagogies: An International Journal 10:2 ► pp. 128 ff. DOI logo
Subiyakto, A’ang, Abd. Rahman Ahlan, Syopiansyah Jaya Putra & Mira Kartiwi
2015. Validation of Information System Project Success Model. Sage Open 5:2 DOI logo
Githaiga, Jennifer Nyawira
2014. Methodological Considerations in Utilization of Focus Groups in an IPA Study of Bereaved Parental Cancer Caregivers in Nairobi. Qualitative Research in Psychology 11:4 ► pp. 400 ff. DOI logo
Doiz, Aintzane, David Lasagabaster & Juan Sierra
2013. Globalisation, internationalisation, multilingualism and linguistic strains in higher education. Studies in Higher Education 38:9 ► pp. 1407 ff. DOI logo
Tierney, Marie, Alexander Fraser & Norelee Kennedy
2013. Users' Experience of Physical Activity Monitoring Technology in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Musculoskeletal Care 11:2 ► pp. 83 ff. DOI logo
Ahmad, Rabiah, Zahri Yunos, Shahrin Sahib & Mariana Yusoff
2012. Perception on Cyber Terrorism: A Focus Group Discussion Approach. Journal of Information Security 03:03 ► pp. 231 ff. DOI logo
Bertini, Patrizia
2012. Focus Groups, Meaning Making and Data Quality. In Information Systems: Crossroads for Organization, Management, Accounting and Engineering, ► pp. 469 ff. DOI logo
Ho, Debbie G. E.
2012. Focus Groups. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, DOI logo
Ho, Debbie G. E.
2024. Focus Groups. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Mohd Adnan, Airil Haimi
2012. Perdre sa langue, perdre son identité, se perdre. Le cas des enfants Orang Asli (aborigènes) de Malaisie1. Droit et Cultures :63 ► pp. 87 ff. DOI logo
Stanojević, Mateusz-Milan, Višna Kabalin Borenić & Višnja Josipović Smojver
2012. Combining Different Types of Data in Studying Attitudes to English as a Lingua Franca. Research in Language 10:1 ► pp. 29 ff. DOI logo
Haugh, Michael
2008. The discursive negotiation of international student identities. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 29:2 ► pp. 207 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue