Article published In: Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 28:1 (2005) ► pp.81–99
The pedagogic effectiveness of developmental readiness in ESL grammar instruction
Published online: 1 January 2005
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.28.1.06man
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.28.1.06man
Abstract
The project reported in this paper aims to test the concept of learner developmental readiness’ and its pedagogic effectiveness in the teaching of foreign language grammar. It focuses on the teaching of English as a second language (ESL) in a formal classroom context. The aim is to ascertain whether a specific teaching order based on the concept of developmental readiness, can enhance learning outcomes in foreign language classrooms. The main theoretical approach used is the Teachability Hypothesis articulated in Pienemann’s (1998) Processability Theory (PT), which “predicts that stages of acquisition cannot be skipped through formal instruction and that instruction will be beneficial if it focuses on structures from ‘the next stage’” (Pienemann, 1998, p. 13). Past teachability studies (e.g. Boss, 1996; Dyson, 1996; Ellis, 1989; Pienemann, 1984; Spada& Lightbown, 1999) have employed predicted order testing. However in this study subjects were exposed to English syntax structures either in the predicted or in the reversed orders outlined under PT. The findings of this study show that learners exposed to instruction in accordance with the developmental order predicted in PT produce the target language (TL) structures with a higher grammatical accuracy than those exposed to the reversed order. This suggests that instruction is more beneficial, in relation to grammatical accuracy, when it focuses on the TL structures in a developmentally implicational manner.
References (21)
Boss, B. (1996). German grammar for beginners – the teachability hypothesis and its relevance to the classroom. In C. Arbones Sola, J. Rolin-Ianziti & R. Sussex (Eds.) Proceedings of the Conference on “Who’s afraid of teaching grammar?”; Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 11 (pp. 93–103). Brisbane: Centre for Language Teaching and Research, University of Queensland.
Doughty, C. & Williams, J. (Eds.) (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dyson, B. (1996). The debate on form-focussed instruction: a teacher’s perspective. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 19 (2), 59–78.
Ellis, R. (1989). Are classroom and naturalistic acquisition the same? A study of the classroom acquisition of German word order rules. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 111, 303–28.
Johnston, M. (1995). Stages of the acquisition of Spanish as a second language. Australian Studies in Language Acquisition, 41, 1–35.
Kempen, G. & Hoenkamp, E. (1987). An incremental procedural grammar for sentence formulation. Cognitive Science, 111, 201–258.
Kramsch, C. (2000). Second language acquisition, applied linguistics, and the teaching of foreign language. The Modern Language Journal, 84 (3), 311–326.
Lightbown, P.M. (1985). Great expectations: second language acquisition research and classroom teaching. Applied Linguistics, 6 (2), 173–89.
Long, M. & Robinson, R. (1998). Focus on form: theory, research and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.) Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15–41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Macroy, G. (2000). Learning to teach grammar in the modern foreign languages classroom. Research in Education, 641, 1–11.
Mansouri, F. (1999). Interlanguage syntax in Arabic as a second language: a processability theory approach. Languages and Linguistics, 41, 45–72.
(2000). Grammatical markedness and information processing in the acquisition of Arabic as a second language. Munchen (Germany): Lincom Europa Academic Publishers.
Mitchell, R. (2000). Applied linguistics and evidence-based classroom practice: the case of foreign language grammar pedagogy. Applied Linguistics, 21 (3), 281–303.
Pienemann, M. (1984). Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6 (2), 186–214.
(1995). Second language acquisition: a first introduction. University of Western Sydney: National Language & Literacy Institute of Australia.
(1998). Language processing and second language development: processability theory. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Cited by (21)
Cited by 21 other publications
Kawaguchi, Satomi
2023. Studies of Japanese as a second language and their contribution to Processability Theory. In Processability and Language Acquisition in the Asia-Pacific Region [Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching, 9], ► pp. 27 ff.
Olsen, Michael K.
Forsyth, Helen Victoria
Grima, Antoinette Camilleri & Jacqueline Żammit
Zhang, Yanyin
2020. The impact of learning context on L2 Chinese word order structure development. Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education 5:2 ► pp. 258 ff.
Hua, Tzu-Ling
Mattsson, Anna Flyman
2019. Morpho-syntactic development in the input. In Teachability and Learnability across Languages [Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching, 6], ► pp. 51 ff.
Tang, Xiaofei
Dyson, Bronwen
Dyson, Bronwen
2019. Are speech and writing teachable?. In Teachability and Learnability across Languages [Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching, 6], ► pp. 71 ff.
Roos, Jana
2016. Acquisition as a gradual process. In Developing, Modelling and Assessing Second Languages [Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching, 5], ► pp. 121 ff.
Roos, Jana
2019. Exploiting the potential of tasks for targeted language learning in the EFL
classroom. In Widening Contexts for Processability Theory [Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching, 7], ► pp. 285 ff.
Baten, Kristof, Aafke Buyl, Katja Lochtman & Mieke Van Herreweghe
2015. Chapter 1. Processability theory. In Theoretical and Methodological Developments in Processability Theory [Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching, 4], ► pp. 1 ff.
Baten, Kristof & Saartje Verbeke
2015. Chapter 4. The Acquisition of the Ergative Case in Hindi as a Foreign Language. In Theoretical and Methodological Developments in Processability Theory [Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching, 4], ► pp. 71 ff.
Doman, Evelyn
2015. Chapter 11. Implications of the Developmental Stages of Language Acquisition for Classroom Teaching. In Theoretical and Methodological Developments in Processability Theory [Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching, 4], ► pp. 239 ff.
Zhang, Xian & James P. Lantolf
Pienemann, Manfred, Jörg-U. Keßler & Yuki Itani-Adams
Dyson, Bronwen Patricia
2010. Learner language analytic methods and pedagogical implications. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 33:3 ► pp. 30.1 ff.
Dyson, Bronwen Patricia
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.