Cover not available

Article published In: Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 27:2 (2004) ► pp.32–49

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Semantic/pragmatic equivalence through formal and motivational shift

The case of number marking in English and Japanese

 | University of Auckland
Published online: 1 January 2004
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.27.2.03moo
Abstract
How would translators approach a process in which they have to make decisions on mapping the grammatically enforced regular number mechanism of a language such as English onto a system like Japanese, where there is no regular coding of number in a noun phrase? Utilising the concepts of motivation for representation of number, and of ‘formal-shift’ (Catford, 1965), this paper demonstrates that in spite of the lack of a grammatical category of number, there is a coherent mechanism that expresses number distinction in Japanese, either implicitly or explicitly, and that in order to achieve the full semantic and pragmatic intent expressed in English in terms of the number of referents, translators have quite a complex task in deciding ‘when’ and ‘how’ to mark number in Japanese. The paper shows that the ‘one’ and ‘more than one’ opposition regularly coded in English is interpreted into a more complex system of number conception in Japanese, namely ‘one’, ‘more than one’, ‘collective image’ and ‘unspecified’. It also draws attention to the various linguistic devices used in Japanese to express number distinction outside the scope of a noun phrase. The paper advocates the usefulness of the approach suggested here for examining instances of transfer of meaning between two typologically distinct languages.
References (40)
References
Allen, K. (1980). Nouns and countability. Language, 561, 541–567. Catford, J. C. (1965). A linguistic theory of translation. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Comrie, B. (1981). Language universals and linguistic typology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corbett, G. (1999). Number. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corrigan, R., Eckman, F. & Noonan, M. (Eds.) (1989). Linguistic categorization. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W. (1990). Typology and universals. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geiger, R. A. & Rudzka-Ostyn, B. (Eds.) (1993). Conceptualizations and mental processing in language. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givón, T. (1978). Universal grammar, lexical structure and translatability. In E. Guenthner & M. Guenthner-Reutter (Eds.) Meaning and translation: philosophical and linguistic approaches (pp. 235–272). London: Buckworth.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. (Ed.) (1966). Universals of grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guenthner, E. & Guenthner-Reutter, M. (Eds.) (1978). Meaning and translation: philosophical and linguistic approaches. London: Buckworth.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haiman, J. (Ed.) (1985). Iconicity in syntax. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1961). Categories of the theory of grammar. Word, 171, 241–292. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ikegami, Y. (1993). What does it mean for a language to have no singular-plural distinction? Noun-verb homology and its typological implication. In R. A. Geiger & B. Rudzka-Ostyn (Eds.) Conceptualizations and mental processing in language (pp. 801–814). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1992). On linguistic aspects of translation. In R. Schulte & J. Biguenet (Eds.) Theories of translation and anthology of essays from Dry den to Derrida (pp. 144–151). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jarkey, N. & Moore, H. (2001). Blurred vision or selective focus: what does the lack of number marking on Japanese nouns tell us about the Japanese language? Paper presented to the Japanese Studies Association of Australia Biennial Conference, University of Sydney, 27–30 June.
Kindaichi, H. (1988). Nihongo joo. Tokyo: Iwanami.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. (1987). Nouns and verbs. Language, 631, 53–94.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MaCawley, J.D. (1968). Review of current trends in linguistics 3. Language, 441, 556–593. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, S. (1975). A reference grammar of Japanese. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matsumoto, K. (1993). Kazu no bunpooka to sono ninchiteki kiban. Gengo, 221, 36–43.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Newmark P. (1991). About translation. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nitta, Y. (1997). Nihongo bunpoo kenkyuu josetsu. Tokyo: Kuroshio Shuppan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Okutsu, K. (1986). Nicchuu taishoo suuryoo hyoogen ‘Quantity expressions of Japanese and Chinese’. Nihongogaku, 51, 70–78.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shinohara, S. (1993). Kasan/fu-kasanmeishi no bunrui kijun. Gengo, 221, 44–49.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shulte, R. & Biguenet, J. (Eds.) (1992). Theories of translation and anthology of essays from Dry den to Derrida. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sugamoto, N. (1989). Pronominality: a noun-pronoun continuum. In R. Corrigan, F. Eckman & M. Noonan (Eds.) Linguistic categorization (pp. 267–291). Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Umegaki, M. (1961). Nichiei hikakugogaku nyuumon. Tokyo: Taishuukan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weinreich, U. (1966). On the semantic structure of language. In J. Greenberg (Ed.) Universals of grammar (pp. 142–216). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (1985). Oats and wheat: the fallacy of arbitrariness. In J. Haiman (Ed.) Iconicity in syntax (pp. 312–342). Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yamanashi, M. (1995). Ninchibunpooron. Tokyo: Hitsuji Shoboo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sources of Examples
Aihara, M. (trans) (1995). Shikei ‘Lynching’. Translated from From potter’s field by P. Cornwell. Tokyo: Koodanshabunko. (sk)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(trans) (1996). Shun ‘Cause of death’. Translated from Cause of death by P. Cornwell. Tokyo: Koodanshabunko. (si)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(trans) (2000). Shinmon ‘A hearing’ Translated from The last precinct by P. Cornwell. (s)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cornwell, P. (1995). From potter s field. London: Warner Books. (FPF)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1996). Cause of death. London: Little, Brown and Company. (CD)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000). The last precinct. London: Little, Brown and Company. (LP)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ikeda, K. (trans) (1995). Sofii no sekai. Translated mainly from the German tranlation of the original Norwegian text Sofies verden by J. Gaarder. Tokyo: NHK Shuppan. (ss)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kawabata, Y. (1973). Utsukushisa to kanashimi to. Tokyo: Chuuookooron. (UK)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MØller, P. (trans) (1995). Sophies world. Translated from Sofies verden (Sophies World in English) by J. Gaarder. London: Phoenix House, (sw)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue