Cover not available

Article published In: Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 27:1 (2004) ► pp.44–57

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

An integrated approach to foreign language writing instruction

 | University of Sydney
Published online: 1 January 2004
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.27.1.04mes
Abstract
This paper puts forth the need for further integration of research on writing-as-a-process in foreign language writing and teaching practices. Several problems are identified concerning the teaching and learning of writing skills, as most teachers attend to the product – its originality, clarity and correctness, and recent popular textbooks on French language and culture still focus on the product and rarely on the process. The extensive research on writing-as-a-process in both Francophone and North American applied linguistics for L1 and L2 does not seem to have had the same repercussions on foreign language teaching or material development as it did on L2 writing skills for ESL/EFL. Here, I propose an integrative approach to writing instruction comprising different findings in process writing, self- and peer-assessment and cross-cultural awareness. The design of a six-step approach stems from a recent book on the pedagogy of writing skills (Mesana-Alais, 2001) and shows how to explore and produce genre-based texts.
References (52)
References
Adam, J.M. (1985). Quels types de texte? Le Français dans le Monde, 1921,39-43.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Allal, L., Bain, D. & Perrenoud, P. (1993). Evaluation formative et didactique du français. Neuchâtel: Delachaux et Niestlé.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Atkinson, D. (2003). Writing in the post-process era: introduction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12 (1), 3-15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baylon, C. & Murillo J. (2000). Forum. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berard, E., Canier, Y. & Lavenne, C. (1997). Tempo 2. Paris: Didier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berard, E. & Lavenne, C. (1989). Grammaire utile du français. Paris: Didier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bereiter, C. & Scardamalia, M. (1987). Knowledge telling and knowledge transforming in written composition. In S. Rosenberg (Ed.) Reading, writing and language learning (pp. 46-69). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bragger, J. D. & Rice, D. (1996). Quant à moi (Manuel de classe & Livre de préparation). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Canale, M. & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 11, 1-47. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Capelle, G. & Gidon, N. (1990). Espaces 2. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charolles, M. (1986). L’analyse des processus rédactionnnels: aspects linguistiques, psychologiques et didactiques. Pratiques, 491 (mars), 3-21.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chevalier, B. (1992). Écrire, pour quoi faire? In A. Bentolila (Ed.) Lecture et écriture (pp. 149-166). Paris: Nathan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Connor, U. (1996). Contrastée rhetoric: cross-cultural aspects of second-language writing. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conseil de l’Europe. (1979). Projet Langues Vivantes. L’écrit et les écrits: problèmes d’analyse et considérations didactiques. Paris: Didier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cope, B. & Kalantzis, M. (1993). The powers of literacy: a genre approach to teaching writing. London: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cornaire, C. & Raymond, P. (1999). La production écrite. Paris: Clé international.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cuq, J-P. & Gruca, I. (2002). Cours de didactique du français langue étrangère et seconde. Grenoble: Presses universitaires de Grenoble.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fayol, M. (1992). L’écrit: perspectives cognitives. In A. Bentolila (Ed.) Lecture et écriture (pp. 101-126). Paris: Nathan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flower, L. (1994). The construction of negotiated meaning: A social cognitive theory of writing. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flower, L. & Hayes, J. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. Gregg & E. Steinberg (Eds). Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3-39). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garcia Debanc, C. (1984). Une évaluation formative en pédagogie de l’écriture. Pratiques, 441, 21-52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Girardet, J. & Cridlig, J-M. (1996). Panorama 2. Paris: Clé International.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Girardet, J. & Pêcheur, J. (2002). Campus. Paris: Clé International.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grabe, W. & Kaplan, R. B. (1996). Theory and practice of writing. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holliday, A. (1997). Appropriate methodology and social context. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horowitz, D. (1986). Process, not product: less than meets the eye. TESOL Quarterly, 201, 141-4. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, K. (2002). Teaching and researching writing. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). Genre-based pedagogies. Journal of Second Language Writing 121, 17-29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaplan, R. B. & Grabe, W. (2002). A modern history of written discourse analysis. Journal of Second Language Writing, 111, 191-223. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kern, R. (2000). Literacy and language teaching. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lavenne, C., Bérard, E. & Tagliante, C. (2001). Studio 60. Paris: Didier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lions, M-L. (2001). Outils pour la classe de langue. Le français dans le monde, 314 (mars-avril), 70.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liu, J & Hansen, J.G. (2002). Peer response in second language writing classroom. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marquillo Larruy, M. (1993). Analyse de consigne et évaluation. Le Français dans le Monde, n° spécial (fév-mars), 83-92.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. (1986). Intervening in the process of writing development. In C. Painter & J. R. Martin (Eds.) Writing to mean: teaching genres across the curriculum (pp. 11-43). Applied Linguistics Association of Australia: Occasional Papers, 9.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCarthy, M. & Carter, R. (1994). Language as discourse: perspectives for language teachers. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mesana-Alais, C. (2001). 10 modules pour l’expression écrite. Paris: Didier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moirand, S. (1979). Situations d’écrit. Paris: Clé International.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Malley, J. & Chamot, A. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paltridge, B. (2001). Genre and the language learning classroom. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pendanx, M. (1998). Les activités d’apprentissage en classe de langue. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raimes, A. (1983). Techniques in teaching writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1991). Out of the woods: traditions in the teaching of writing. TESOL Quarterly, 251, 407-430. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reuter, Y. (1996). Enseigner et apprendre à écrire : construire une didactique de l’écriture. Paris: ESF éditeur.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scott, V. (1996). Rethinking foreign language writing. Boston: Heinle and Heinle.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silva, T. (1993). Toward an understanding of the distinct nature of L2 writing: the ESL research and its implications. TESOL Quarterly, 271, 657-677. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sommer, N. (1980). Revision strategies of student writers and experienced adult writers. College composition and communication, 311, 378-88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Susser, B. (1994). Process approaches in ESL/EFL writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 31, 31-47. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tardif, J. (1992). Pour un enseignement stratégique. L’apport de la psychologie cognitive. Montréal: Les Editions Logiques.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tobin, L. (2001). Process pedagogy. In G. Tate, A. Rupiper & K. Schick (Eds.) A guide to composition pedagogies (pp. 1-18). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomlin, R. S. (1994). Functional grammars, pedagogical grammars, and communicative language teaching. In T. Odlin (Ed.) Perspectives on pedagogical grammar (pp. 140-178). New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zamel, V. (1987). Recent research on writing pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 211, 697-715. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue