Article published In: Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 26:2 (2003) ► pp.17–30
Perceptions of kanji learning strategies
Do they differ among Chinese character and alphabetic background learners?
Published online: 1 January 2003
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.26.2.02gam
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.26.2.02gam
This study investigates three important issues in kanji learning strategies; namely, strategy use, effectiveness of strategy and orthographic background. A questionnaire on kanji learning strategy use and perceived effectiveness was administered to 116 beginner level, undergraduate students of Japanese from alphabetic and character backgrounds in Australia. Both descriptive and statistical analyses of the questionnaire responses revealed that the strategies used most often are the most helpful. Repeated writing was reported as the most used strategy type although alphabetic background learners reported using repeated writing strategies significantly more often than character background learners. The importance of strategy training and explicit instruction of fundamental differences between character and alphabetic background learners of Japanese is discussed in relation to teaching strategies.
References (35)
Bourke, B. (1996). Maximising efficiency in the kanji learning task. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Queensland.
Brown, J. D. (1988). Understanding research in second language learning: a teacher’s guide to statistics and research design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chikamatsu, N. (1996). The effects of L1 orthography on L2 word recognition: A study of American and Chinese learners of Japanese. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18( 4), 403–432.
Douglas, M. O. (1992). Development of orthography-related reading/writing strategies by learners of Japanese as a foreign language Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana Campaign, Illinois.
Frost, R. (1994). Prelexical and postlexical strategies in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 131, 104–115.
Fujiyoshi, T. (1996). Kanji learning strategies used by Australian learners of Japanese. Unpublished M.A dissertation, Monash University, Melbourne.
Grainger, P. R. (1997). Language learning strategies for learners of Japanese: Investigating ethnicity. Foreign Language Annals, 30( 3), 379–383.
Hayes, E. B. (1988). Encoding strategies used by native and L2 readers of Chinese Mandarin. Modern Language Journal, 721, 188–195.
Ishida, T. (1986). Eigo,chuugokugo kankokugo kenbetsu nihongo gakuryoku no bunseki [The analysis of the Japanese language proficiency of English, Chinese and Korean students]. Nihongo kyooiku [Journal of Japanese language teaching], 581, 162–164.
Japan Foundation (2000). Present condition of overseas Japanese-language education: Survey report on Japanese-language education abroad 1998: A summary. Urawa, Tokyo: Japanese Language Institute: The Japan Foundation.
Kaiho, H., & Saito, H. (1989). Measuring various aspects of kanji (Chinese characters) and its psychological implications. Quantitative Linguistics, 391, 151–163.
Katz, L., & Feldman, L. B. (1983). Relation between pronunciation and recognition of printed words in deep and shallow orthographies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 91, 157–166.
Ke, C. (1998). Effects of language background on the learning of Chinese characters among foreign language students. Foreign Language Annals, 31 (1), 91–100.
Koda, K. (1989). Effects of L1 orthographic representation on L2 phonological coding strategies. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18( 2), 201–222.
(1990). The use of L1 reading strategies in L2 reading: effects of L1 orthographic structures on L2 phonological recoding strategies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12( 4), 393–410.
(1992). The effects of lower-level processing skills on FL reading performance: Implications for instruction. Modern Language Journal, 76( 4), 502–512.
Machida, S. (2000). Japanese text comprehension by Chinese and non-Chinese background learners. System, 29(3), 103–118.
Matsunaga, S. (1999). The role of kanji knowledge transfer in acquisition of Japanese as a foreign language. Sekai no Nihongo Kyooiku [Japanese Language Education Around the Globe], 91, 87–100.
Mori, Y. (1998). Effects of first language and phonological accessibility on kanji recognition. Modern Language Journal, 82(1), 69–82.
Mori, Y., & Nagy, W. (1999). Integration of information from context and word elements in interpreting novel kanji compounds. Reading Research Quarterly, 34(1), 80–101.
Naka, M., & Naoi, H. (1995). The effect of repeated writing on memory. Memory and Cognition, 23(2), 201–212.
Okita, Y. (1995). Kanji gakushuu sutoratejii to gakusei no kanji gakushuu ni taisuru shinnen [Kanji learning strategies and student beliefs on kanji learning]. Sekai no Nihongo Kyooiku [Japanese Language Education Around the Globe], 51, 105–124.
Onose, M. (1988). Nazori oyobi shisha renshuu no kumiawase ga yooji/jidoo no shoji ginoo ni oyobosu kooka [Effect of the combination of tracing and copying practices on hand writing skills of Japanese letters in preschool and first grade children]. Kyooiku Shinrigaku Kenkyuu [Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology], 361, 129–134.
Oxford, R. L. (1989). Use of language learning strategies: a synthesis of studies with implications for strategy training. System, 17(2), 235–247.
(1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House Publishers.
(1993). Research on second language learning strategies. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 131, 175–187.
Perfetti, C. A., & Zhang, S. (1991). Phonological processes in reading Chinese characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 171, 633–643.
Perfetti, C. A., Zhang, S., & Berent, I. (1992). Reading in English and Chinese: Evidence for a “universal” phonological principle. In R. Frost & L. Katz ( Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology and meaning. (pp. 227–248). Amsterdam.
Shimizu, H., & Green, K. E. (2002). Japanese language educators’ strategies for and attitudes toward teaching kanji. Modern Language Journal, 86(2), 227–241.
Takahashi, E. (2001). Nature of JFL learners’ phonological representations in kanji processing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh.
Toyoda, E. (1995). Kanji gakushuu ni taisuru gakushuusha no ishiki [Learners’ feeling toward kanji study]. Nihongo Kyooiku [Journal of Japanese Language Teaching], 851, 101–113.
(1998). Teaching kanji by focusing on learners’ development of graphemic awareness. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 21(15), 155–168.
Watanabe, H., & Toyoda, E. (1993). Kanji no jikei chikaku, ninchi, tanki kioku ni kansuru jisshooteki kenkyuu 1 [An emperical study on perception, recognition and short term memory of kanji]. Tokyo Gaikokugo Daigaku Ryugakusei Nihongo Kyooiku Sentaa Ronshuu [Bulletin of Japanese Language: Centre for International Students, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies], 201, 63–75.
Cited by (21)
Cited by 21 other publications
Bórquez Morales, Lilia Sulema & F. Daniel Morales Hernández
Zhang, Xiaoyan, Lina Du & Xinyu Zhu
Nakayama, Tomokazu
Mori, Yoshiko
Purgina, Marina, Maxim Mozgovoy & John Blake
Gelsomini, Federico, Kamen Kanev, Patrick Hung, Bill Kapralos, Michael Jenkin, Reneta P. Barneva & Mariagioia Vienna
Mori, Yoshiko, Motoko Omori & Kumi Sato
Paxton, Simon & Chavalin Svetanant
Filipi, Anna
Tsukada, Kimiko
Everson, Michael E.
Mori, Yoshiko & Junko Mori
Li, Mengmeng, Hiroaki Ogata, Bin Hou, Satoshi Hashimoto, Noriko Uosaki, Yuqin Liu & Yoneo Yano
Li, Mengmeng, Hiroaki Ogata, Bin Hou, Satoshi Hashimoto, Yuqin Liu, Noriko Uosaki & Yoneo Yano
Li, Mengmeng, Hiroaki Ogata, Bin Hou, Satoshi Hashimoto, Yuqin Liu, Noriko Uosaki & Yoneo Yano
Iwashita, Noriko & Sachiyo Sekiguchi
Iwashita, Noriko & Sachiyo Sekiguchi
Yu, Yuanfang & Bing Wang
Mori, Yoshiko, Kumi Sato & Hideko Shimizu
Mori, Yoshiko & Hideko Shimizu
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.