Article published In: Literacies: Tertiary contexts:
Compiled and edited by Zosia Golebiowski
[Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 25:2] 2002
► pp. 49–58
Social literacies and students in tertiary settings
Lessons from South Africa
Published online: 1 January 2002
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.25.2.05boc
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.25.2.05boc
Abstract
In this article we explore the consequences of the social literacies model of understanding students’ academic literacy practices at a South African University. We highlight some of the paradoxes of this model in South Africa in terms of the particular demands of dominant literacy practices and past discriminatory policies which denied access to such practices and which created alternative practices. We include some observations we have made about including alternative literacies in assessment practices in tertiary classrooms.
References (5)
Bialystok, E. & Cummins, J. (1991). Language, cognition and the education of bilingual children. In E. Bialystok (Ed.) Language processing in bilingual children (pp. 222–232). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gough, D. & Bock, Z. (2001). Alternative perspectives on orality, literacy and education: a view from South Africa. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 22 (2), 95–111.
Halliday, M.A.K. (1996). Literacy and linguistics: a functional perspective. In R. Hasan & G. Williams (Eds.) Literacy in society (pp. 339–371). London: Longman.
Leibowitz, B. (1997). Work in progress: reflections on a university writing assignment in the light of the NQF and OBE. Unpublished paper, South African Applied Linguistics Association Conference.
Street, B. V. (1996). Preface. In M. Prinsloo & M. Breier (Eds.) The social uses of literacy: theory and practice in contemporary South Africa (pp. 1–9). Cape Town: SACHED books and John Benjamins Publishing.
