Article published In: Literacies: Tertiary contexts:
Compiled and edited by Zosia Golebiowski
[Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 25:2] 2002
► pp. 29–47
General academic writing and discipline specific academic writing
Published online: 1 January 2002
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.25.2.04kal
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.25.2.04kal
References (26)
Buckingham, J. & Nevile, M. (1997). Comparing the citation choices of experienced academic writers and first year students. In Z. Golebiowski (Ed.) Policy and practice of tertiary literacy. Selected proceedings of the First National Conference on Tertiary Literacy: research and practice, (pp. 96–107). Melbourne: Victoria University of Technology.
Cadman, K. (1997). Thesis writing for international students: a question of identity? English for Specific Purposes, 16 (1), 3–14.
Chafe, W. (1985). Linguistic differences produced by differences between speaking and writing. In D. Olson, N. Torrance & A. Hildyard (Eds) Literacy, language and learning: the nature and consequences of reading and writing (pp. 105–123). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chanock, K. (1997). Never say ‘I’?: the writer’s voice in essays in the humanities. In Z. Golebiowski & H. Borland (Eds.) Academic communication across disciplines and cultures. Selected proceedings of the First National Conference on Tertiary Literacy: research and practice (pp. 54–63). Melbourne: Victoria University of Technology.
Clark, H. H. & Haviland, S. E. (1977). Comprehension and the given-new contract. In R.O. Freedle (Ed.) Discourse production and comprehension (pp. 1–40). New Jersey: Ablex.
Cooper, M. M. & Holzman, M. (1988). Cohesion, coherence and incoherence. In M. Cooper & M. Holzman (Eds.) Writing as social action (pp. 94–108). Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook.
Crompton, P. (1992). Hedging in academic writing: some theoretical problems. English for Specific Purposes, 16 (4), 71–287.
Elliott, M. (1997). The teaching of academic discourse: collaboration between discipline lecturers and academic support staff at RMIT. In Z. Golebiowski & H. Borland (Eds.) Academic communication across disciplines and cultures. Selected proceedings of the First National Conference on Tertiary Literacy: research and practice (pp. 77–87). Melbourne: Victoria University of Technology.
Ferguson, G. (1997). Literacy in the disciplines: giving academics a language to talk about language. In Z. Golebiowski (Ed.) Policy and practice of tertiary literacy. Selected proceedings of the First National Conference on Tertiary Literacy: research and practice (pp. 161–166). Melbourne: Victoria University of Technology.
Garner, M. (1997). Some questions about integrated communication skills programs. In Z. Golebiowski (Ed.) Policy and practice of tertiary literacy. Selected proceedings of the First National Conference on Tertiary Literacy: research and practice (pp. 37–41). Melbourne: Victoria University of Technology.
Hallet, R. (1997). Promoting language skills through collaboration between content lecturers and language specialists. In Z. Golebiowski & H. Borland (Eds.) Academic communication across disciplines and cultures. Selected proceedings of the First National Conference on Tertiary Literacy: research and practice (pp. 88–102). Melbourne: Victoria University of Technology.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1989). Some grammatical problems in scientific English. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics. Genre & Systemic Functional Studies, Series 5 (6), 13–37.
Hamp-Lyons, L. (1991). Writer’s knowledge and our knowledge of the writer. In L. Hamp-Lyons (Ed.). Assessing second language writing in academic contexts (pp. 51–67). New Jersey: Ablex.
Ivanic, R. & Simpson, J. (1992). Who’s who in academic writing? In N. Fairclough (Ed.) Critical language awareness (pp. 141–1730. New York: Longman.
Kaldor, S., Herriman, M. & Rochecouste, J. (1997). Cross-disciplinary and discipline-specific discourse features in student academic writing. In Z. Golebiowski & H, Borland (Eds.) Academic communication across disciplines and cultures. Selected proceedings of the First National Conference on Tertiary Literacy: research and practice (pp. 198–208). Melbourne: Victoria University of Technology.
(1998). Tertiary student writing. A report for the collaborative ARC project ‘Framing Student Literacy: Aspects of cross-cultural communication in Australian universities’. Macquarie University, NSW: NCELTR.
Lakoff, G. (1972). Hedges: a study of meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. In Papers for the Eighth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society Papers, Vol. 81. (pp. 183–228). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Martin, J. (1993). Literacy in science: learning to handle texts as technology. In M.A.K. Halliday & J. R. Martin Writing science (pp. 166–202). London: Falmer Press.
Skelton, J. (1997). The representation of truth in academic and medical writing. Applied Linguistics, 18 (2), 121–140.
Sodowsky, R. E. & Witte, S. P. (1983). Topical chains in high and low-quality informative texts of college freshman. Paper presented at the Conference on College Composition and Communication, Detroit.
Silyn-Roberts, H. (1997). The report and the essay: Are we muddling science and engineering undergraduates by asking them to write in two different genres? In Z. Golebiowski & H. Borland (Eds.) Academic communication across disciplines and cultures. Selected proceedings of the First National Conference on Tertiary Literacy: research and practice (pp. 240–247). Melbourne: Victoria University of Technology.
Cited by (10)
Cited by ten other publications
Mathew, Priya & Deepali Bhatnagar
Clarke, Patricia, Daniel Schull, Glen Coleman, Rachael Pitt & Catherine Manathunga
Johansen, Edda & Thomas Harding
BASTURKMEN, HELEN
Vardi, Iris
Vardi, Iris
Terraschke, Agnes & Ridwan Wahid
Lee, Sook Hee (Susan)
Gimenez, Julio
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.