Article published In: Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 25:1 (2002) ► pp.53–70
Focus on learnable form in a communicative context
A framework for second language acquisition in the classroom
Published online: 1 January 2002
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.25.1.04dys
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.25.1.04dys
Abstract
In this article I present the concept of ‘focus on learnable form’ and show how it could be implemented in the classroom. ‘Focus on form’ research has produced increasing evidence that a form focus can improve the acquisition of the particular form while remaining compatible with the communicative approach. The learnability of grammatical form, a key issue in this research, has been addressed in some studies by identifying the emergence of the form. Since there are problems in relying on emergence, I argue for the adoption of Processability Theory (Pienemann, 1998) and specifically the construct of developmental stages. This framework enables teachers to predict the forms that would be beneficial to focus on and those that are developmentally too advanced for effective focus on form. Despite criticisms of ‘structural’ approaches to SLA research, Processability Theory has a lot to offer communicative language teaching. As I have found in teaching ESL to adolescent and adult learners, ‘focus on learnable form’ in a communicative context is achievable in the classroom and can be implemented as one component of a communicative curriculum by following three steps: assessing the learners, selecting a ‘learnable’ form and focusing on this learnable form in a communicative context.
References (45)
Boss, B. (1996). German grammar for beginners - the Teachability Hypothesis and its relevance in the classroom. In C. ArbonesSola, J. Rolin-Ianzit & R. Sussex (Eds). Who’s afraid of teaching grammar? Papers in Language and Linguistics, 11, 93–103.
Bresnan, J. (1982). The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Clahsen, H., Meisel, J. & Pienemann, M. (1983). Deutsch als zweitsprache: der spracherwerb auslandischer arbeiter. Tubingen: Narr.
Collins, P., Hollo, C. & Mar, J. (1997). English grammar in school textbooks: a critical survey. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 201, 33–51.
DeKeyser, R. (1995). Learning second language grammar rules: an experiment with a miniature linguistic system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17(3), 249–297.
Di Biase, B. (in press). L’acquisizione della morfologia dell’ italiano L2. Italiano e Scuola. 3.1.
Doughty, C. & Varela, E. (1998). Communicative focus on form. In C. Doughty. & J. Williams (Eds) (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Doughty, C. & Williams, J. (1998a) Issues and terminology. In C. Doughty. & J. Williams (Eds) (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(1998b). Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In C. Doughty. & J. Williams (Eds) (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dyson, B. (1996). The debate on form-focused instruction: a teacher’s perspective. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 191, 59–77.
Ellis, N. (1993). Rules and instances in foreign language learning: interactions of implicit and explicit knowledge. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 5(3), 289–319.
Ellis, R. (1993). Second language acquisition and the structural syllabus. TESOL Quarterly, 271, 91–113.
Fernandez, S. (1996). Room for two: a study of bilingual education at Bayswater South Primary School. Belconnen, ACT: The National Languages and Literacy Institute of Australia.
Forster, M. (1999). Developmental assessment principles and practice. Australian Language Matters, 7, 3, 7–9.
Hakansson, G. (1998). Modern times in L2 Swedish: on the acquisition of Swedish morphology and syntax in formal and informal settings. In L. Diaz & C. Perez (Eds). EuroSLA 7 Proceedings (pp. 39–50). Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
Harley, B. (1998). The role of focus-on-form tasks in promoting child L2 acquisition. In C. Doughty. & J. Williams (Eds) (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johnston, M. (1985). Syntactic and morphological progressions in learner English. NSW: Adult Migrant Education Service.
(1994a). Second language acquisition: a classroom perspective. Australian Studies in Language Acquisition, 11.
(1994b). Stages of the acquisition of Spanish as a Second Language. Australian Studies in Language Acquisition, 41.
(2000). Stages of the acquisition of English as a Second Language. Australian Studies in Language Acquisition, 91.
Kawaguchi, S. (1996). Referential choice in native speakers and learners of Japanese. MA Thesis, Australian National University.
Larsen-Freeman, D. & Long, M.H. (1991). An introduction to second language acquisition theory and research. London: Longman.
Lightbovvn, P, & Spada, N. (1990). Focus on form and corrective feedback in communicative language teaching: effects on second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12 (4), 429–448
Lightbovvn, P. (1993). Input, instruction and feedback in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 7, 2, ii–iv.
Lightbown, P. (1998). The importance of timing in focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 177–197). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Long, M. (1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: task-based language training. In K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (Eds) Modelling and assessing second language acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
(1991). Focus on Form: a design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, D. Coste, C. Kramsch & R. Ginsberg (Eds) Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Long, M. & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: theory, research and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds) Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lyster, R. (1994). The effect of functional-analytic teaching on aspects of French immersion students’ sociolinguistic competence. Applied Linguistics, 15(3), 263–287.
Mansouri, F. (1995). The acquisition of subject-verb agreement in Arabic as a second language. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 18 (2), 62–84.
Meisel, J. M., Clahsen, C & Pienemann, M. (1981). On determining developmental stages in natural second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 109–135.
Peterson, P.G. (1998). Past time reference in learner English. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 21 (2), 21–43.
Pienemann, M. (1984). Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6 (2), 186–214.
(1985). Learnability and syllabus construction. In K. Hyltenstam. Pienemann, M. (Eds). Modelling and assessing second language acquisition. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.
(1988). Determining the influence of instruction on L2 speech processing. In G. Kasper (Ed) AILA Review, 51, 40–72.
(1989). Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses. Applied Linguistics, 11, 52–79.
(1995). Second language acquisition: a first introduction. Australian Studies in Language Acquisition, 21.
(1998). Language processing and second language development -Processability Theory. Benjamins.
Pienemann, M., Johnston, M. and Brindley, G. (1988). Constructing an acquisition-based procedure for second language assessment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 101, 217–224.
Robinson, P. (1996). Learning simple and complex language rules under implicit, incidental, rule-search and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18 (1), 27–68.
Spada, N. & Lightbown, P. (1993). Instruction and the development of questions in L2 classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 151, 205–221.
White, J. (1998). Getting the learner’s attention: a typographic input enhancement study. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Chavez, Monika
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.