Cover not available

Article published In: Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 22:2 (1999) ► pp.19–33

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

When “okay” is okay in computer science seminar talk

 | Australian National University
Published online: 1 January 1999
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.22.2.02ren
Abstract
Analysis of a series of seminars given by CSIRO computer scientists indicates that the use of the discourse marker: okay, is not random; rather, it plays an important role in orienting the listener to the overall structure of the seminar. This paper shows how okay occurs in specific environments, with specific prosodic features, and how its role and function vary according to where it occurs within the talk. Okay occurs most frequently at the boundary of one section of talk and the next, although its function varies according to whether it is associated with the beginning or with the end of a section of talk. This paper highlights the close interaction between talk and action, with special emphasis on the precise way in which saying okay is co-ordinated with placing the overhead slide on the screen.
References (29)
References
Atkinson, J.M. and J. Heritage (eds) (1984) Structures of Social Interaction: Studies in Conversational Analysis. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beach, W. (1990) Language as and in technology: Facilitating topic organisation in a videotex focus group meeting. In M.J. Medhurst, A. Gonzalez and T.R. Peterson (eds) Communication and the Culture of Technology. Pullman (WA), Washington State University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1993) Transitional regularities for ‘causal’ ‘okay’ usages. Journal of Pragmatics 191: 325–352. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, G and G. Yule (1983) Discourse Analysis. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Button, G. (1987) >Moving out of closings. In G. Button and J.R.E. Lee (eds) Talk and Social Organisation. Clevedon, Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1990) On varieties of closing. In G. Psathas (ed.) Interaction Competence: Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis. Washington, DC, International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis and University Press of America.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Button, G. and J.R.E. Lee (eds) (1987) Talk and Social Organisation. Clevedon, Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe W.L. (1979) The flow of thought and the flow of language. In T. Givón (ed.) Syntax and Semantics: Discourse and Syntax Vol 12. New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chaudron, C. and J. Richards (1986) The effect of discourse markers on the comprehension of lectures. Applied Linguistics 7, 2: 113–127. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Condon, S. (1986) The discourse functions of OK. Semiotica 601: 73–101. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dorr-Bremme, D.W. (1990) Contextualisation cues in the classroom: Discourse regulation and social control functions. Language in Society 191: 379–402. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flowerdew, J. and S. Tauroza (1995) The effect of discourse markers on second language lecture comprehension. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 171: 435–458. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraser, B. (1990) An approach to discourse markers. Journal of Pragmatics 141: 383–395. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gardner, R. (1994) Conversation analysis transcription. In Rod Gardner (ed.) Spoken Interaction Studies in Australia (Australian Review of Applied Linguistics Series S No. 11). ALAA, Canberra, pp. 185–191.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1981) Forms of Talk. Oxford, Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hatch, E. (1992) Discourse and Language Education. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hinds, J. (1979) Organizational patterns in discourse. In T. Givón (ed.) Syntax and Semantics: Discourse and Syntax. New York, Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jucker, A.H. (1993) The discourse marker well: a relevance-theoretical account. Journal of Pragmatics 191: 435–452. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Merritt, M. (1984) On the use of O.K. in service encounters. In J. Baugh and J. Sherzer (eds) Language in Use: Readings in Sociolinguistics. New Jersey, Prentice-Hall Inc.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rendle-Short, J. (1998) Discourse Markers in Computer Science Seminar Talk. MA Thesis, Department of Linguistics, ANU.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, H. (1984) On doing “being ordinary”. In J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Interaction: Studies in Conversational Analysis. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, H., E.A. Schegloff, G. Jefferson (1974) A simplest sematics for the organisation of turn-taking in conversation. Language 50, 4: 695–735. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, E.A. (1979) Identification and recognition in telephone conversation openings. In G. Psathas (ed.) Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnometh-odology. New York, Irvington.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1986) The routine as achievement. Human Studies 91: 111–152. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1995) Sequence Organization. Manuscript, Department of Sociology, UCLA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, E.A. and H. Sacks (1973) Opening up closings. Semiotica 81: 289–327. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (1987) Discourse Markers. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Segel, E.M., J.F. Duchan, and P.J. Scott (1991) The role of interclausal connectives in narrative structuring: Evidence from adults’ interpretations of simple stories. Discourse Processes 141: 27–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. and M. Coulthard (1975) Towards an Analysis of Discourse: the English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (16)

Cited by 16 other publications

Fuseini, Kadir
2025. The Multifunctional Use of Discourse Markers in an ESL Classroom: An Empirical Study of ‘Okay,’ ‘Oh,’ ‘Well,’ and ‘So’. Journal of Linguistics and Language in Education 18:2 ► pp. 111 ff. DOI logo
Ro, Eunseok
2025. Changing practices of instruction-giving in video-mediated interaction for an extensive reading book club. Computer Assisted Language Learning 38:3 ► pp. 453 ff. DOI logo
Almossa, Amereh Ibrahim
2023. The Emergence of Tab in Najdi Arabic. Languages 8:4 ► pp. 245 ff. DOI logo
Garcia, Angela Cora
2019. How Mediation Works, DOI logo
Looney, Stephen Daniel, Dingding Jia & Daisuke Kimura
2017. Self-directed okay in mathematics lectures. Journal of Pragmatics 107 ► pp. 46 ff. DOI logo
Gaines, Philip
2011. The Multifunctionality of Discourse Operator Okay: Evidence from a police interview. Journal of Pragmatics 43:14 ► pp. 3291 ff. DOI logo
Vickers, Caroline & Ryan Goble
2011. Well, Now, Okey Dokey: English Discourse Markers in Spanish-Language Medical Consultations. The Canadian Modern Language Review 67:4 ► pp. 536 ff. DOI logo
Schleef, Erik
2008. THE “LECTURER'SOK” REVISITED: CHANGING DISCOURSE CONVENTIONS AND THE INFLUENCE OF ACADEMIC DIVISION. American Speech 83:1 ► pp. 62 ff. DOI logo
Schleef, Erik
2009. A cross-cultural investigation of German and American academic style. Journal of Pragmatics 41:6 ► pp. 1104 ff. DOI logo
Nevile, Maurice & Johanna Rendle-Short
2007. Language as action. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 30:3 ► pp. 30.1 ff. DOI logo
Nevile, Maurice & Johanna Rendle-Short
2007. Language as action. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 30:3 ► pp. 30.1 ff. DOI logo
Nevile, Maurice
2005. ‘Checklist complete’. or is it? closing a task in the airline cockpit. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 28:2 ► pp. 60 ff. DOI logo
Filipi, Anna & Roger Wales
2003. Differential uses of okay, right, and alright, and their function in signaling perspective shift or maintenance in a map task. Semiotica 2003:147 DOI logo
Rendle-Short, Johanna
2003. “So what does this show us?”. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 26:2 ► pp. 46 ff. DOI logo
Rendle-Short, Johanna
2022. Showing structure. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 479 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. OKAY across Languages [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 34], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue