Cover not available

Article published In: Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 47:2 (2024) ► pp.153–173

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Receptive vocabulary size estimates for general and academic vocabulary at a multi-campus Australian university

ORCiD logo with link | Federation University Australia
ORCiD logo with link | Federation University Australia
ORCiD logo with link | Federation University Australia
 | Federation University Australia
 | Federation University Australia
Published online: 8 June 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.21099.gre
Abstract
There are few published estimates of vocabulary sizes amongst students in tertiary education. Research does not offer estimates of the vocabulary size tertiary students might be expected to possess, though estimates exist for K-12 education, some EFL contexts, and the general population. Such research is important. For reading comprehension during tertiary education, a vocabulary of minimally 10,000 words is recommended, along with proficiency in academic vocabulary. A recent study of three universities in the United Kingdom concluded pedagogical intervention was required, since estimates indicated undergraduates knew fewer than 10,000 words. A subsequent study of a New Zealand university found students knew 16,000 words and pedagogical intervention was not required. The current study investigates 433 tertiary students at an Australian university to determine if students required vocabulary support. It contributes to a research record allowing for comparisons internationally, nationally, and over time. Methods employed included the Vocabulary Size Test/VST and Academic Vocabulary Test/AVT. Results indicate an average vocabulary size of 16,117 words, with academic vocabulary well-known.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Current estimates of vocabulary sizes in different educational contexts
  • 3.Academic vocabulary knowledge
  • 4.The present study
  • 5.Methodology
  • 6.Results
  • 7.Discussion
  • 8.Limitations and future research
  • 9.Conclusion
  • References
References (46)
References
Amorsen, A., & Miller, M. (2017). Children’s oral language development and early literacy practices. Educating Young Children: Learning and Teaching in the Early Childhood Years, 23(1), 24–27.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anglin, J. M. (1993). Vocabulary development: A morphological analysis. With commentary by George A. Miller and Pamela C. Wakefield. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58(10), i+iii+v-vi+1-186. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biemiller, A., & Slonim, N. (2001). Estimating root word vocabulary growth in normative and advantaged populations: Evidence for a common sequence of vocabulary acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 498–520. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bourke, T., Mills, R., & Siostrom, E. (2020). Origins of primary specialisation in Australian education policy: What’s the problem represented to be? The Australian Educational Researcher, 471, 725–740. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, D., Stewart, J., Stoeckel, T., & McLean, S. (2021). The coming paradigm shift in the use of lexical units. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(5), 950–953. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brysbaert, M., Stevens, M., Mandera, P., & Keuleers, E. (2016). How many words do we know? Practical estimates of vocabulary size dependent on word definition, the degree of language input and the participant’s age. Frontiers in Psychology, 71, 1116–1116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clay, M. M. (1991). Introducing a new storybook to young readers. The Reading Teacher, 45(4), 264–273. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213–238. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coxhead, A., Nation, P., & Sim, D. (2014). Creating and trialling six versions of the Vocabulary Size Test. TESOLANZ Journal, 221, 13–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Measuring the vocabulary size of native speakers of English in New Zealand secondary schools. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 50(1), 121–135. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DiCerbo, P. A., Anstrom, K. A., Baker, L. L., & Rivera, C. (2014). A Review of the Literature on Teaching Academic English to English Language Learners. Review of Educational Research, 84(3), 446–482. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duff, D., & Brydon, M. (2020). Estimates of individual differences in vocabulary size in English: How many words are needed to ‘close the vocabulary gap’? Journal of Research in Reading, 43(4), 454–481. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (2007). Peabody picture vocabulary test (PPVT-4) (4th ed.). Pearson assessments.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, B., Sawyer, J., Gill, R., Medlin, J., & Wilson, D. (2005). Influences of the learning environment of a regional university campus on its international graduates. Australian Educational Researcher, 32(2), 65–85. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gardner, D., & Davies, M. (2014). A new academic vocabulary list. Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 305–327. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graves, M. F. (2016). The vocabulary book: Learning and instruction. Teachers College Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Green, C., & Lambert, J. (2018). Advancing disciplinary literacy through English for academic purposes: Discipline-specific wordlists, collocations and word families for eight secondary subjects. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 351, 105–115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Green, C. (2022). Computing curriculum time and input for the incidental learning of academic vocabulary. Language, Learning and Technology, 26(1), pp. 1–21.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2021). The oral language productive vocabulary profile of children starting school: A resource for teachers. Australian Journal of Education, 65(1), 41–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gyllstad, H., McLean, S., & Stewart, J. (2020). Using confidence intervals to determine adequate item sample sizes for vocabulary tests: An essential but overlooked practice. Language Testing, Advanced online publication, 1–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hart, B., & Risley, T. (1995). Meaningful differences in everyday parenting and intellectual development in young American children. Brookes.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kong, Y., Seo, Y. S., & Zhai, L. (2018). Comparison of reading performance on screen and on paper: A meta-analysis. Computers and Education, 1231, 138–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krashen, S. D. (2004). The power of reading: Insights from the research. (2nd ed.). Libraries Unlimited; Heinemann.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McLean, S. (2021). The coverage comprehension model, its importance to pedagogy and research, and threats to the validity with which it is operationalized. Reading in a Foreign Language, 33(1), 126–140. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McLean, S., & Kramer, B. (2015). The creation of a new vocabulary levels test. Shiken, 19(2), 1–11.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McLean, S., Kramer, B., & Beglar, D. (2015). The creation and validation of a listening vocabulary levels test. Language Teaching Research, 19(6), 741–760. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McLean, S., Stewart, J., & Batty, A. O. (2020). Predicting L2 reading proficiency with modalities of vocabulary knowledge: A bootstrapping approach. Language Testing, 37(3), 389–411. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McQuillan, J. (2020). Harry Potter and the prisoners of vocabulary instruction: Acquiring academic language at Hogwarts. Reading in a Foreign Language, 32(2), 122–142. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milton, J., & Treffers-Daller, J. (2013). Vocabulary size revisited: The link between vocabulary size and academic achievement. Applied Linguistics Review, 4(1), 151–172. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? The Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 59 – 81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P., & Beglar, D. (2007). A vocabulary size test. The Language Teacher, 31(7), 9–13.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pecorari, D., Shaw, P., & Malmström, H. (2019). Developing a new academic vocabulary test. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 391, 59–71. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pantelich, M. (2021). A student-centred approach: The English Language Support Service for international students. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 15(1), 72–84.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmitt, N., Cobb, T., Horst, M., & Schmitt, D. (2017). How much vocabulary is needed to use English? Replication of van Zeeland & Schmitt (2012), Nation (2006) and Cobb (2007). Language Teaching, 50(2), 212–226. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmitt, N., Nation, P., & Kremmel, B. (2020). Moving the field of vocabulary assessment forward: The need for more rigorous test development and validation. Language Teaching, 53(1), 109–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 40–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stewart, J., Stoeckel, T., McLean, S., Nation, P., & Pinchbeck, G. G. (2021). What the research shows about written receptive vocabulary testing: A reply to Webb. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(2), 462–471. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stoeckel, T., Bennett, P., & McLean, S. (2016). Is “I Don’t Know” a viable answer choice on the Vocabulary Size Test? TESOL Quarterly, 50(4), 965–975. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stoeckel, T., McLean, S., & Nation, P. (2021). Limitations of size and levels tests of written receptive vocabulary knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(1), 181–203. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stoeckel, T., Stewart, J., McLean, S., Ishii, T., Kramer, B., & Matsumoto, Y. (2019). The relationship of four variants of the Vocabulary Size Test to a criterion measure of meaning recall vocabulary knowledge. System (Linköping), 871, 102161. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thomas, D. P. (2020). Rapid decline and gender disparities in the NAPLAN writing data. Australian Educational Researcher, 47(5), 777–796. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Townsend, D., Filippini, A., Collins, P., & Biancarosa, G. (2012). Evidence for the importance of academic word knowledge for the academic achievement of diverse middle students. The Elementary School Journal, 112(3), 497–518. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Webb, S., Sasao, Y., & Ballance, O. (2017). The updated Vocabulary Levels Test: Developing and validating two new forms of the VLT. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 168(1), 33–69. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wingate, U. (2011). A comparison of ‘additional’ and ‘embedded’ approaches to teaching writing in the disciplines. In M. Deane & P. O’Neil (Eds.), Writing in the disciplines. (pp. 65–87). Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhang, S., & Zhang, X. (2022). The relationship between vocabulary knowledge and L2 reading/listening comprehension: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research, 26(4), 696–725. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Green, Clarence, Anthony Pak-Hin Kong, Marc Brysbaert & Kathleen Keogh
2025. Crowdsourced and AI-generated age-of-acquisition (AoA) norms for vocabulary in print: Extending the Kuperman et al. (2012) norms. Behavior Research Methods 57:11 DOI logo
Malmström, Hans, Diane Pecorari & Marcus Warnby
2025. Teachers’ receptive and productive vocabulary sizes in English-medium instruction. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 46:7 ► pp. 1905 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue