Article published In: Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 47:1 (2024) ► pp.78–100
Intimacy in online classrooms
Linguaplay, personal testimonies, and contrived chaotic material ecologies
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
This article was made Open Access under a CC BY 4.0 license through payment of an APC by or on behalf of the author.
Published online: 3 November 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.21050.dob
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.21050.dob
Abstract
In this article I describe the transition of a group of university students in Australia into an online learning environment during COVID-19 pandemic disruptions. I reflect upon my intersubjective experiences as the lecturer in an unexpected situation of urgency and physical distancing. Research has acknowledged synchronous virtual learning contexts as less psychologically distancing than previously thought. I argue that these contexts can foster profound intimacy between participants through linguistic and multimodal means. I use an auto-ethnographic narrative inquiry approach to share observations gained retrospectively through multimodal, critically reflexive, social semiotic discourse analysis of audio-visual recordings of synchronous workshops conducted in 2020. I attempt to fill the gap in research on intimacy in online educational settings by suggesting that intimacy can be created by linguaplay, personal testimonies, and contrived chaotic material ecologies. I advocate moving away from an obsession with standardising and generating student knowledge in formal online learning to a stance that values intimacy, connection, and spontaneity.
Keywords: intimacy, online learning, linguaplay, personal testimonies, material ecologies
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Intimacy in face-to-face educational settings
- 3.Intimacy in multimodal online educational settings
- 4.Research design
- 4.1Participants
- 4.2Data collection
- 4.3Data analysis
- 5.Linguaplay
- 6.Personal testimonies
- Small story – Laying myself bare
- 7.Contrived chaotic material ecologies
- 8.Discussion
- 9.Conclusion
References
References (86)
Abrahamson, C. E. (1998). Storytelling as a pedagogical tool in higher education. Education, 118(3), 440.
Aikens, J. W., Collibee, C., & Cunningham, J. (2015). Gossiping to the top: Observed differences in popular adolescents’ gossip. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 37(5), 642–661.
Akarasriworn, C., & Ku, H. Y. (2013). Graduate students’ knowledge construction and attitudes toward online synchronous videoconferencing collaborative environments. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 14(1), 35–48.
Allen, J., & Doherty, M. (2004). Learning through work, discourse and participation: Storied lives, self and social-changing cultures. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 44(2), 158–178.
Ananga, P., & Biney, I. K. (2017). Comparing face-to-face and online teaching and learning in higher education. MIER Journal of Educational Studies Trends and Practices, 7(2), 165–179.
Anderson, G. J. (1968). Effects of classroom social climate on individual learning [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Harvard University.
Artino, A. R., & Jones, K. D. (2012). Exploring the complex relations between achievement emotions and self-regulated learning behaviors in online learning. Internet and Higher Education, 151, 170–175.
Baepler, P., & Walker, J. D. (2014). Active learning classrooms and educational alliances: Changing relationships to improve learning. In P. Baepler, D. C. Brooks, & J. D. Walker (Eds.), Active learning spaces: New directions for teaching and learning (pp. 27–40). Wiley.
Bair, D., & Bair, M. (2011). Paradoxes of online teaching. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 5(2), 1–15.
Baskerville, D. (2011). Developing cohesion and building positive relationships through storytelling in a culturally diverse New Zealand. Teaching and Teacher Education, 271, 107–115.
Bateson, G. (1953). The position of humor in human communication. In H. von Foerster (Ed.), Cybernetics, Ninth Conference (pp. 1–47). Josiah Macey Jr Foundation.
Canagarajah, S. (2021). Materialising semiotic repertoires: Challenges in the interactional analysis of multilingual communication. International Journal of Multilingualism, 18(2), 206–225.
Canagarajah, S., & Dovchin, S. (2019). The everyday politics of translingualism as a resistant practice. International Journal of Multilingualism, 16(2), 127–144.
Canagarajah, A. S. (2004). Subversive identities, pedagogical safe houses, and critical learning. In B. Norton & K. Toohey (Eds.), Critical pedagogies and language learning (pp. 116–137). Cambridge University Press.
Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 1–32.
Cekaite, A., & Aronsson, K. (2005). Language play, a collaborative resource in children’s L2 learning. Applied Linguistics, 26(2), 169–191.
Chen, J. C. (2020). The interplay of avatar identities, self-efficacy, and language practices. ARAL, 44(1), 65–81.
Chen, J., & Dobinson, T. (2020). Digital communication in a virtual community of practice: Linguistic/paralinguistic behaviour in the multimodal context of Blackboard Collaborate. In S. Dovchin (Ed.), Language, digital communication and society (pp.121–146). P. Lang.
Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 39(7), 3–7.
Coates, J. (2007). Talk in a play frame: More on laughter and intimacy. Journal of Pragmatics, 391, 29–49.
(2010). Defining and monitoring academic standards in Australian higher education. Higher Education Management and Policy, 22(1), 1–17.
Coole, D. H., & Frost, S. (2010). Introducing the new materialisms. In D. H. Coole & S. Frost (Eds.), New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics (pp. 1–43). Duke University Press.
Creese, A., Takhi, J. K., & Blackledge, A. (2017). Reflexivity in team ethnography: Using researcher vignettes. In M. Martin-Jones & D. Martin (Eds.), Researching multilingualism: Critical and ethnographic perspectives (pp. 203–214). Routledge.
Csikar, E., & Stefaniak, J. E. (2018). The utility of storytelling strategies in the biology classroom. Contemporary Educational Technology, 9(1), 42–60.
Cumming, R. (2007). Language play in the classroom: Encouraging children’s intuitive creativity with words through poetry. Literacy, 41(2), 93–101.
Cutrone, P. (2009). Overcoming Japanese EFL learners’ fear of speaking. Language Studies Working Papers, 1(1), 55–63.
Davies, C. E. (2003). How English-learners joke with native speakers: An interactional sociolinguistic perspective on humor as collaborative discourse across cultures. Journal of Pragmatics 351, 1361–1385.
Denzin, N. K. (2000). The practices and politics of interpretation. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 897–922). Sage.
Dobransky, N. D., & Bainbridge Frymier, A. (2004). Developing teacher-student relationships through out of class communication. Communication Quarterly, 52(3), 211–223.
Dovchin, S. (2015). Language, multiple authenticities and social media: The online language practices of university students in Mongolia. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 19(4), 437–459.
Dovchin, S., Pennycook, A., & Sultana, S. (2017). Popular culture, voice and linguistic diversity: Young adults on-and offline. Springer.
Espinoza, M. (2009). A case study of the production of educational sanctuary in one migrant classroom. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4(1), 44–62.
Eynon, T. (2001). Metaphor: The impossible translation? British Journal of Psychoanalysis, 17(3), 353–364.
Fortune, D., & Mair, H. (2011). Notes from the sports club: Confessional tales of two researchers. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 40(4), 457–484.
Garrison, D. R. (2009). Communities of inquiry in online learning. In P. L. Rogers (Ed.), Encyclopedia of distance learning (pp. 352–355). IGI Global.
Gilmore, S., & Warren, S. (2007). Emotion online: Experiences of teaching in a virtual learning environment. Human Relations, 60(4), 581–608.
Gosmire, D., Morrison, M., & Van Osdel, J. (2009). Perceptions of interactions in online courses. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 5(4), 609–617.
Gray, P. (2013). Free to learn: Why unleashing the instinct to play will make our children happier, more self-reliant, and better prepared for life. Basic Books.
Guichon, N., & Cohen, C. (2014). The impact of the webcam on an online L2 interaction. Canadian Modern Language Journal, 70(3), 331–354.
Hawkins, A., Barbour, M. K., & Graham, C. (2012). “Everybody is their own island”: Teacher disconnection in a virtual school. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(2), 123–144.
Heflich, D. A., & Putney, L. G. (2001). Intimacy and reflection: Online conversation in a practicum seminar. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 17(3), 10–17.
Kendall, J. E., & Kendall, K. E. (2017). Enhancing online executive education using storytelling: An approach to strengthening online social presence. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 15(1), 62–81.
Kim, J.-H. (2015). Understanding narrative inquiry: The crafting and analysis of stories as research. Sage.
Lapidaki, E. (2020). Toward the discovery of contemporary trust and intimacy in higher education music. In I. M. Yob & E. R. Jorgensen (Eds.), Humane music education for the common good (pp. 261–273). Indiana University Press.
Lehtonen, M., Page, T., Miloseva, L., & Thorsteinsson, G. (2008). Development of social mediation and emotional regulation in virtual learning environment research. i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, 2(1), 34–47.
Li, W., & Zhu, H. (2019). Tranßcripting: Playful subversion with Chinese characters. International Journal of Multilingualism, 16(2), 145–161.
Lin, T. J., & Chen, C. H. (2018). A preliminary study of the form and status of passionate affection emoticons. International Journal of Design, 12(2), 75–90.
McCarthy, M., & Carter, R. (2004). “There’s millions of them”: Hyperbole in everyday conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 361, 149–184.
Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Testimony. In Merriam-Webster.com dictionary. Retrieved December 31, 2021, from [URL]
Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students. Volume 2: A third decade of research. Jossey-Bass.
Pérez-Sedeño, E., Almendros, L. S., Dauder, S. G., & Arjonilla, E. M. O. (2019). Knowledges, practices and activism from feminist epistemologies. Vernon Press.
Plaza, S. R. (2010). Egalitarian dialogue and instrumental dimension: Two principles of dialogic learning in the classroom. Psychology, Society & Education, 2(1), 71–82.
Pomerantz, A., & Bell, N. D. (2011). Humour as a safe house in the foreign language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 951, 148–161.
Reddington, E. (2015). Humour and play in language classroom interaction: A review of the literature. Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics, 15(2), 22–38.
Richardson, L., & St Pierre, E. A. (2008). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (pp. 473–499). Sage.
Rogerson-Revell, P. (2007). Humour in business: A double-edged sword: A study of humour and style shifting in intercultural business meetings. Journal of Pragmatics, 391, 4–28.
Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 141. [URL]
Rudd, D. P., & Rudd, D. P. (2014). The value of video in online instruction. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 131, 1–7.
Satar, H. M. (2015). Sustaining multimodal language learner interactions online. CALICO Journal, 32(3), 480–507.
Shin, N. (2002). Beyond interaction: The relational construct of transactional presence. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 17(2), 121–137.
Stojanov, K. (2016). Educational justice as respect egalitarianism. Critique and Humanism Journal, 46(2), 249–260.
Sultana, S., & Dovchin, S. (2019). Relocalization in digital language practices of university students in Asian peripheries: Critical awareness in a language classroom. Linguistics and Education, 621, 100752.
Sultana, S., Dovchin, S., & Pennycook, A. (2013). Styling the periphery: Linguistic and cultural takeup in Bangladesh and Mongolia. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 17(5), 687–710.
Swan, K. (2003). Developing social presence in online course discussions. In S. Naidu (Ed.), Learning and teaching with technology: Principles and practices (pp. 147–164). Kogan Page.
Thorpe, S. (2008). Enhancing the effectiveness of online groups: An investigation of storytelling in the facilitation of online groups [Doctoral dissertation, Auckland University of Technology]. Auckland University of Technology Open Repository. [URL]
Uttamchandani, S. (2020). Educational intimacy: Learning, prefiguration, and relationships in an LGBTQ+ youth group’s advocacy efforts. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 30(1), 52–75.
Vakil, S., McKinney de Royston, M., Nasir, N. I. S., & Kirshner, B. (2016). Rethinking race and power in design-based research: Reflections from the field. Cognition and Instruction, 34(3), 194–209.
Wang, S. S. (2015). More than words? The effect of line character sticker use on intimacy in the mobile communication environment. Social Science Computer Review, 34(4), 1–23.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. Systems Thinker, 9(5), 2–3.
Yin, Y., Chik, A., & Falloon, G. (2021). Understanding the translingual practices among international students in multilingual cities. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics. Advance online publication.
