Article published In: Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 46:3 (2023) ► pp.339–372
Identifying a pedagogical genre of literature review
Published online: 23 May 2023
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.21044.afi
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.21044.afi
Abstract
This article reports initial parts of a classroom-based action research aimed to teach students to write a literature review (LR), which is considered as a critical, yet often overlooked genre, thus posing difficulties to the students. The existing works on LRs appear to treat the ability to write overviews of individual studies, and to combine them in acceptable ways, as assumed knowledge. In fact, for the learners in the context of the study, and in many second- and foreign-language learning contexts, such abilities are not shared among learners. Therefore, in the implementation of an initial short course, a genre analysis of 60 literature reviews from publications and completed theses in applied linguistics was conducted to identify suitable generic patterns used in literature reviews that could be implemented in the context. The result is a pedagogical genre of literature review, a genre description of LRs appropriate for the students’ English proficiency level, outlined in detail in this article with the teaching implication for this pedagogical context.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Literature review
- 2.1Genre
- 2.2Literature reviews
- 2.3From pedagogical grammar to pedagogical genre
- 3.Methodology
- 4.Annotated bibliographies as an entry point to literature review writing
- 5.Pedagogical genre of literature review
- 5.1Reviewing paragraphs: Author-focused and content-focused
- 5.2Sections: Listing and integrating
- 5.2.1Listing sections
- 5.2.2Integrating sections
- 6.Implications for teaching
- 7.Conclusion
References
References (46)
Akhtar, R., Hassan, H., & Saidalvi, A. (2020). The effects of ESL student’s attitude on academic writing apprehensions and academic writing challenges. International journal of psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24 (5), 5404 – 5412.
Al Badi, I. A. H. (2015). Academic writing difficulties of ESL learners. WEI International Academic Conference Proceedings. [URL]
Andrade, M. S., Evans, N. W. & Hartshorn, K. J. (2015). Perceptions and realities of ESL students in higher education: An overview of Institutional Practices. In N. W. Evans, N. J. Anderson, & W. G. Eggington (Eds.), ESL readers and writers in higher education: Understanding challenges, providing support (pp.18–35). Routledge.
Azizifar, A., Mansoor, K., & Lofti, A. R. (2010). An analytical evaluation of locally produced Iranian high school ELT textbooks from 1970 to the Present. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 36–44.
Badenhorst, C. (2018). Citation practice of postgraduate students writing literature reviews. London Review of Education, 16(1), 121 – 135.
Beach, R., Bigelow, M., Brendler, B., Coffino, K., Dillon, D., Frederick, A., Gabrielli, M., Helman, L., Ngo, B., O’Brien, D., Rambow, A., Scharber, C., Sethi, J., Braaksma, M., Janssen, T., Thein, A. H., Liang, L., & Stornaiuolo, A. (2012). Annotated bibliography of research in the teaching of English. Research in the Teaching of English, 47(2), AB1–AB101.
Bednarek, M., Crosthwaite, P., & Garcia, A. (2020). Corpus linguistics and education in Australia. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 43(2), 105–116.
Bitchener, J. (2016). The content feedback practices of applied linguistics doctoral supervisors in New Zealand and Australian universities. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 39(2), 105–121.
Boote, D. N., & Beile, P. (2005). Scholars before researchers: On the centrality of the dissertation Literature Reviews in research preparation. Educational researcher, 34(6), 3–15.
Bunton, D. (1999). The use of higher level metatext in Ph.D. theses. English for Specific Purposes, 18(Supplement 1), S41–S56.
(2002). Generic moves in Ph.D. thesis introductions. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp. 57–75). Routledge.
Chen, X., & Li, M. (2019). Chinese learner writers’ niche establishment in the literature review chapter of theses: A diachronic perspective. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 391, 48–58.
Cheng, A. (2007). Transferring generic features and recontextualizing genre awareness: Understanding writing performance in the ESP genre-based literacy framework. English for Specific Purposes, 261, 287–307.
Coe, R. M. (2002). The new rhetoric of genre: writing political briefs. In A. M. Johns (Ed.), Genre in the classroom: multiple perspectives (pp.197–210). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Derewianka, B. (2001). Pedagogical grammars: Their roles in English language teaching. In A. Burns & C. Coffin (Eds.), Analyzing English in a global context: A reader (pp. 240–268). Routledge.
Forey, G., Besser, S., & Sampson, N. (2015). Parental involvement in foreign language learning: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 16(3), 383–413.
Gil-Salom, L., & Soler-Monreal, C. (2014). Writers’ positioning in literature reviews in English and Spanish computing doctoral theses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 161, 23–39.
Hart, C. (1998). Doing a literature review: Releasing the social science research imagination. Sage Publications.
Hector-Mason, S., and Bardack, S. (2010). Annotated bibliography. English Language Learner Center American Institutes for Research.
Hopkins, A., & Dudley-Evans, T. (1988). A genre-based investigation of the discussion section in articles and dissertations. English for Specific Purposes, 71, 113–121. [URL]
Hyland, K. (2015). Genre, discipline & identity. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 191, 32–43.
Johns, A., Bawarshi, A., Coe, R., Hyland, K., Paltridge, B., Rieff, M., & Tardy, C. (2006). Crossing the boundaries of genre studies: Commentaries by experts. Journal of Second Language Writing, 151, 234–249.
Kwan, B. S. C. (2006). The schematic structure of literature review in doctoral theses of applied linguistics. English for Specific purposes, 251, 30–55.
Martin, J. R. (2009). Genre and language learning: A social semiotic perspective. Language and Education, 201, 10–21.
(2014). Looking out: Functional linguistics and genre. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 9(3), 307–321.
Martin, J. R., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1991). Systemic typology and topology. In F. Christie (Ed.), Literacy in social processes: Papers from the inaugural Australian Systemic Linguistics Conference, held at Deakin University, January 1990 (pp. 345–383). Centre for Studies in Language in Education, Northern Territory University, Australia.
Ratnawati, R., Faridah, D., Anam, S., & Retnaningdyah, P. (2018). Exploring academic writing needs of Indonesian EFL undergraduate students. Arab World English Journal, 9 (4), 420–432.
Rose, D. (2012). Genre in the Sydney School. In J. P. Gee & M. Handford (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 209–225). Routledge.
Schleppegrell, M. J. (2012). Academic language in teaching and learning: Introduction to special issue. The Elementary School Journal, 112(3), 409–418.
Soler-Monreal, C. (2015). Announcing one’s work in PhD theses in computer science: A comparison of move 3 in literature reviews written in English L1, English L2 and Spanish L1. English for Specific Purposes, 401, 27 – 41.
Soler-Monreal, C., & Gil-Salom, L. (2011). A cross-language study on citation practice in PhD theses. International Journal of English Studies, 11(2), 53 – 75.
Starks, D., & Lewis, M. (2003). The annotated bibliography: structure and variation within a genre. Australian review of applied linguistics, 26(2), 101–117.
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
(2012). A text and its commentaries: Towards a reception history of ‘Genre in three traditions’ (Hyon, 1996). Iberica, 241, 103–116.
Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2012). Academic writing for graduate students (3rd ed). University of Michigan Press.
Thompson, P. (2009). Literature review in Applied PhD theses: Evidence and problems. In K. Hyland & G. Diani (Eds.), Academic evaluation: Review genres in university settings (pp. 50–67). Palgrave Macmillan.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
