Cover not available

Article published In: Translingual practices entangled with semiotized space and time
Edited by Shaila Sultana and Dariush Izadi
[Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 45:2] 2022
► pp. 219–239

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Phones as a semiotic disadvantage

English as a Foreign language migrants in Australia

ORCiD logo with link | Curtin University
Published online: 19 May 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.21028.dry
Abstract
While previous studies have outlined the advantages of semiotic resources for meaning making and relationship building, not all semiotic resources are equal in their ability to enhance these features. Using linguistic ethnographic interviews and focus group discussions, this article examines whether mobile phones provide sufficient semiotic resources for English as a Foreign Language (EFL) migrants to effectively communicate, particularly for service situations regarding finances where they often have to speak in English with unknown interlocutors. Two important elements are uncovered regarding EFL migrants’ difficulty in using phones as a semiotic resource – (1) linguistic superiority, where they are judged by their English-speaking interlocutor as engaging in inferior English practices, and (2) paralinguistic insufficiency, where the lack of gestures and facial expressions takes away their ability to make meaning. These elements combined make telephone conversations difficult for many EFL migrants, affecting their expressiveness and ability to effectively communicate, leading to negative outcomes such as avoidance behaviors, and feelings of anxiety and disempowerment. Such difficulties lead to the finding that EFL migrants must be better accommodated when engaging in service transactions, with other, semiotically richer resources required to better aid their understanding and ease feelings of anxiety.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Phones as a semiotic advantage for communication
  • 3.Phones as a semiotic disadvantage for communication
  • 4.Methodology
  • 5.Ethics
  • 6.Phones as a semiotic disadvantage: Linguistic superiority
  • 7.Phones as a semiotic disadvantage: Paralinguistic insufficiency
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
References (41)
References
Arminen, I., & Weilenmann, A. (2008). Mobile presence and intimacy: Reshaping social actions in mobile contextual configuration. Journal of Pragmatics, 411, 1905–1923. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Back, M., Han, M., & Weng, S. C. A. (2020). Emotional scaffolding for emergent multilingual learners through translanguaging: Case stories. Language and Education, 34(5), 387–406. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhatia, T. K. (2018). Accent, intelligibility, mental health, and trauma. World Englishes, 371, 421–431. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Birney, M. E., Rabinovich, A., Morton, T. A., Heath, H., & Ashcroft, S. (2020). When speaking English is not enough: The consequences of language-based stigma for nonnative speakers. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 39(1), 67–86. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blackledge, A., & Creese, A. (2020). Interaction ritual and the body in a city meat market. Social Semiotics, 30(1), 1–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blommaert, J., & Rampton, B. (2011). Language and superdiversity. Diversities, 13(2), 1–20.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bucholtz, M. (2011). Race and the re-embodied voice in Hollywood film. Language & Communication, 311, 255–265. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2016). Embodied sociolinguistics. In N. Coupland (Ed.), Sociolinguistics: Theoretical debates (pp. 173–200). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Canagarajah, S. (2013). Translingual practice: Global Englishes and cosmopolitan relations. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Translingual practice as spatial repertoires: Expanding the paradigm beyond structuralist orientations. Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 31–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., DiCenso, A., Blythe, J., & Neville, A. J. (2014). The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41(5), 545–547. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Costa, P. I. (2020). Linguistic racism: Its negative effects and why we need to contest it. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23(7), 833–837. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dovchin, S. (2015). Language, multiple authenticities and social media: The online language practices of university students in Mongolia. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 19(4), 437–459. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). Language crossing and linguistic racism: Mongolian immigrant women in Australia. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 14(4), 334–351. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020). The psychological damages of linguistic racism and international students in Australia. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23(7), 804–818. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dovchin, S., Pennycook, A., & Sultana, S. (2017). Popular culture, voice and linguistic diversity: Young adults on- and offline. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foo, A. L., & Tan, Y. Y. (2019). Linguistic insecurity and the linguistic ownership of English among Singaporean Chinese. World Englishes, 381, 606–629. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. (1992). Contextualization and understanding. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 229–252). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holtgraves, T., & Paul, K. (2013). Texting versus talking: An exploration in telecommunication language. Telematics and Informatics, 301, 289–295. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Izadi, D. (2017). Semiotic resources and mediational tools in Merrylands, Sydney, Australia: The case of Persian and Afghan shops. Social Semiotics, 27(4), 495–512. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Karpiński, M. (2012). The boundaries of language: Dealing with paralinguistic features. Lingua Posnaniensis, 54(2), 37–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kusters, A., Spotti, M., Swanwick, R., & Tapio, E. (2017). Beyond languages, beyond modalities: Transforming the study of semiotic repertoires. International Journal of Multilingualism, 14(3), 219–232. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, J. W., & Dovchin, S. (2020). Negotiating innovation and ordinariness. In J. W. Lee & S. Dovchin (Eds.), Translinguistics: Negotiating innovation and ordinariness (pp. 1–5). Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, W. (2016). New Chinglish and the post-multilingualism challenge: Translanguaging ELF in China. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 5(1), 1–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lippi-Green, R. (2012). English with an accent: Language, ideology and discrimination in the United States. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maybin, J., & Tusting, K. (2011). Linguistic ethnography. In J. Simpson (Ed.), Routledge handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 515–528). Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and Thought. University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norris, S. (2004). Analyzing multimodal interaction: A methodological framework. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2007). Global Englishes and transcultural flows. Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Translanguaging and semiotic assemblages. International Journal of Multilingualism, 14(3), 269–282. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pennycook, A., & Otsuji, E. (2020). The mundanity of metrolingual practices. In J. W. Lee & S. Dovchin (Eds.), Translinguistics: Negotiating innovation and ordinariness (pp. 9–23). Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pink, S., Hjorth, L., Horst, H., Nettheim, J., & Bell, G. (2018). Digital work and play: Mobile technologies and new ways of feeling at home. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 21(1), 26–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosa, J. (2016). Standardization, racialization, languagelessness: Raciolinguistic ideologies across communicative contexts. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 26(2), 162–183. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rossini, N. (2012). Reinterpreting Gesture as Language. IOS Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schandorf, M. (2012). Mediated gesture: Paralinguistic communication and phatic text. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 19(3), 319–344. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Singer, J. B. (2009). Ethnography. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 861, 191–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Starfield, S. (2015). Ethnographic research. In B. Paltridge & A. Phakiti (Eds.), Research methods in applied linguistics: A practical resource (pp. 137–152). Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sultana, S. (2019). Resources within the local-global interface of the virtual space: Critically aware youths in Bangladesh. In T. A. Barrett & S. Dovchin (Eds.), Critical inquiries in the sociolinguistics of globalization (pp. 1–19). Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Streeck, J. (2017). Self-making man: A day of action, life, and language. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thurlow, C., & Mroczek, K. R. (2011). Digital discourse: Language in the new media. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhu, H., Otsuji, E., & Pennycook, A. (2017). Multilingual, multisensory and multimodal repertoires in corner shops, streets and markets: Introduction. Social Semiotics, 27(4), 383–393. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Izadi, Dariush & Stephanie Dryden
2024. Woman/life/freedom: The social semiotics behind the 2022 Iranian protest movement. Discourse, Context & Media 60 ► pp. 100803 ff. DOI logo
Oliver, Rhonda, Honglin Chen & Sender Dovchin
2024. Review of selected research in applied linguistics published in Australia (2015–2022). Language Teaching 57:3 ► pp. 341 ff. DOI logo
Dryden, Stephanie & Dariush Izadi
2023. The small things of Global South: Exploring the use of social media through translingualism. Discourse, Context & Media 51 ► pp. 100668 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue