Article published In: Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 21:2 (1998) ► pp.105–122
Animals, embryos, thinkers and doers
Metaphor and gender representation in Hong Kong English
Published online: 1 January 1998
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.21.2.06luc
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.21.2.06luc
Abstract
Research into the linguistic descriptions of women have revealed that females tend to be defined in terms of their relationships to men, their appearance and/or sexual attributes, and that women and their activities tend to be trivialised (Pauwels 1987; Thorne et al. 1983). Additional, more recent research into gender representation has revealed dehumanising descriptions of women as food and as animals, such as birds and horses (Hines 1994; Stirling 1987). Such metaphors reflect individually or socially constructed conceptual associations between real-world phenomena that may serve to trivialise or enhance members of a given group. This paper reports on an investigation into lexical representations of men and women in the Hong Kong variety of English. Analysis includes all nominal and verbal descriptors of men and women and the acts performed by them. These descriptors were distributed into semantic classes on the basis of the qualities they reveal about their human referents. Results show that men are conceptualized as pro-active and assertive beings, to some extent born to succeed; while women are under-developed, emotional and in need of protection. The gender metaphors of women are compatible with concepts of both early stages of human development and subhuman entities, such as animals.
References (27)
Bryant, P. (1980) Australian questioning intonation: as addition to speaker’s response-seeking repertoire. BA Hons Thesis, ANU Australia.
Coates, J. and D. Cameron (eds) (1988) Women in their speech communities: New perspectives on language and sex. London, Longman.
Fillmore, C. (1975) An alternative to checklist theories of meaning. Proceedings of the 16th Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 11:123–131.
Hall, K. and M. Bucholtz (eds) (1995) Gender articulated: Language and the socially constructed self. New York, Routledge.
Hines, C. (1994) What’s so easy about pie?: The lexicalization of a metaphor. In A. Goldberg (ed.) Conceptual structure, Discourse and language. Cambridge, CUP.
Lakoff, G. (1987) Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
(1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (ed.) Metaphor and thought. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
(ms.) Philosophy in the flesh: How the embodied mind creates philosophy.
Luchjenbroers, J. (1995) Cognitive linguistics and gender representation. HKPU: Working Papers in ELT and Applied Linguistics 1,1:73–104.
Pauwels, A. (ed.) (1987) Women and language in Australian and New Zealand society. Mosman, Australian Professional Publications.
Radtke, H.L. and H.J. Stam (eds) (1994) Power/gender: Social relations in theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA., Sage.
Shnukal, A. (1982) You’re getting somethink for nothing: Two phonological variables of Australian English. Australian Journal of Linguistics 2,2:197–212.
Stirling, L. (1987) Language and gender in Australian Newspapers. In A. Pauwels (ed.) Women and language in Australian and New Zealand society. Mosman, Australian Professional Publications.
Sweetser, E. (1991) From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge, CUP.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed
Yu, Yating
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
