Cover not available

Article published In: Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 21:1 (1998) ► pp.57–70

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Procedural vocabulary as a device to organize meaning and discourse

 | Universidad Jaume I de Castellón
Published online: 1 January 1998
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.21.1.04jos
Abstract
Procedural vocabulary has been defined as a type of core vocabulary with low lexicality and high indexicality (Widdowson 1983 1984; Robinson 1989 1992). This paper analyzes the linguistic notion of procedural vocabulary and proposes that several vocabulary concepts described by different authors (e.g. Vocabulary 3, Anaphoric nouns) are part of this type of vocabulary. The paper also discusses the role of procedural vocabulary in discourse and suggests that the concepts of schema and procedure are relevant for the description of this type of vocabulary and its categorization into two types: procedural defining vocabulary and procedural organizing vocabulary. Procedural defining vocabulary is used for negotiating meaning and for defining concepts related to a particular content schema. Procedural organizing vocabulary is concerned with the actualization of formal schemata and contributes to organizing the development of the discourse.
References (27)
References
Brown, P. and S. Levinson (1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge, Cambrdge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crombie, W. (1985) Process and relation in discourse and language learning. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Færch, C. and G. Kasper (1984) Pragmatic knowledge: Rules and procedures. Applied Linguistics 51:214-226. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Francis, G. (1986) Anaphoric nouns. Discourse Analysis Monographs 11. English Language Research, University of Birmingham.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1994) Labelling discourse. In M. Coulthard (ed.) Advances in written text analysis. London and New York, Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, H.P. (1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole and J.L. Morgan (eds) Syntax and semantics vol 31 Speech acts. New York, Academic. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1967) Interaction ritual. Garden City NY, Doubleday.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. (1985) Introduction to functional grammar. London, Edward Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoey, M. (1983) On the surface of discourse. London, Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hornby, A.S. (ed.). (1974) Oxford advanced learner’s dictionary of current English London, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hutchinson, T and A. Waters (1981) Performance and competence in English for specific purposes. Applied Linguistics 2,1:56-69. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ivanic, R. (1991) Nouns in search of a context: a study of nouns with both open and closed system characteristics. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 21:93-114.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, G. (1983) Principles of pragmatics. London, Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luzón, M. J. (1994) Procedural vocabulary in rhetorical functions in English scientific texts. Unpublished Dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luzón, M.J. (1997) The rhetorical function of the lexical signalling of the author’s presence in the experimental biomedical paper. Castellón, Publicaciones de la Universidad Jaume I, D.L.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, J. (1989) Factual writing: Exploring and challenging social reality. London, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (1988) Componential analysis and Malinokswky’s language in action feature grids, prototypes and procedural vocabulary. Quademi di Semantica 18,2:319-330.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1989) Procedural vocabulary and language learning. Journal of Pragmatics 13,4:523-546. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1992) Procedural and declarative knowledge in vocabulary learning: communication and the language learner’s lexicon. In J. Coady, M. Haynes, and T. Huckin (eds) Second language reading and vocabulary acquisition. Norwood, N.J., Ablex Pusblishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. (1981) Planes of discourse. In S.N.A. Rizvi (ed.) The two-fold voice: Essays in honour of Ramesh Mohan. Saltzburg, University of Saltzburg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(ed.) (1987) The Collins Cobuild English language dictionary. London, Collins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Widdowson, H.G. (1983) Learning purpose and language use. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1984) Explorations in applied linguistics 2. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1990) Aspects of language teaching. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Winograd, T. (1975) Frame representation and the declarative-procedural controversy. In D.G. Bobrow and A. Collins (eds) Representation and understanding. New York, Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Winter, E. (1974) Replacement as a function of repetition: A study of some of its principal features in the clause relations of contemporary English. PhD Thesis. University of London.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1977) A clause relational approach to English texts: A study of some predictive items in written discourse. Instructional Science 6,1:1-92. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue