Article published In: Problematizing Language Policy and Practice in EMI and Transnational Higher Education: Challenges and Possibilities
Edited by Curtis Green-Eneix, Peter I. De Costa and Wendy Li
[Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 44:2] 2021
► pp. 129–153
Implementing English-medium instruction
Comparing policy to practice at a Turkish university
Published online: 7 July 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.20094.sah
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.20094.sah
Abstract
As part of the trend toward internationalization of higher education, governments and universities have introduced
policies to encourage the expansion of English-medium instruction (EMI). However, top-down policies do not necessarily translate
to teaching and learning practices. This article provides a case study examining the implementation of undergraduate EMI
engineering programs at a state university in Turkey to explore the gaps that exist between national- and institutional-level EMI
policies and classroom-level practices. Data were collected through policy documents, classroom observations, semi-structured
interviews with teachers, and focus group discussions with students. The findings suggest that the implementation of EMI varies
across classrooms, even within the same university department. Despite policies that envision one-language-at-a-time instruction,
the EMI lecturers in this study varied in terms of language preference and teaching practice in their EMI lectures. Implications
are discussed with respect to policy planning, teacher training, and the expansion of EMI across university contexts.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Literature review
- 2.1EMI aims and implementation
- 2.2Language use and challenges in EMI
- 3.Methodology
- 3.1Research questions and framework
- 3.2Setting: The case university
- 3.3Data collection
- 3.4Data analysis
- 4.Results
- 4.1Language of instruction in EMI programs
- 4.2Students’ English proficiency requirements and support
- 4.3Teachers’ English proficiency requirements and support
- 4.4Language learning as an aim of EMI
- 5.Discussion and conclusion
- Note
References
References (49)
Airey, J. (2012). “I don’t teach language”: The linguistic attitudes of physics lecturers in Sweden. AILA Review, 25(1), 64–79.
Aizawa, I., & Rose, H. (2019). An analysis of Japan’s English as medium of instruction initiatives within higher education: The gap between meso-level policy and micro-level practice. Higher Education, 77(6), 1125–1142.
Ali, N. L. (2013). A changing paradigm in language planning: English-medium instruction policy at the tertiary level in Malaysia. Current Issues in Language Planning, 14(1), 73–92.
Baker, W., & Hüttner, J. (2017). English and more: A multisite study of roles and conceptualisations of language in English medium multilingual universities from Europe to Asia. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 38(6), 501–516.
Baldauf, R. B. (2006). Rearticulating the case for micro language planning in a language ecology context. Current Issues in Language Planning, 7(2–3), 147–170.
Barakos, E., & Unger, J. W. (Eds.). (2016). Discursive approaches to language policy. Palgrave Macmillan.
Block, D., & Moncada-Comas, B. (2019). English-medium instruction in higher education and the ELT gaze: STEM lecturers’ self-positioning as NOT English language teachers. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 1–17. Advance online publication.
Chapple, J. (2015). Teaching in English is not necessarily the teaching of English. International Education Studies, 8(3), 1–13.
Cin, F. M., Gümüş, S., & Weiss, F. (2020). Women’s empowerment in the period of the rapid expansion of higher education in Turkey: Developments and paradoxes of gender equality in the labour market. Higher Education. Advance online publication.
Costa, F. (2012). Focus on form in ICLHE lectures in Italy: Evidence from English-medium science lectures by native speakers of Italian. AILA Review, 251, 30–47.
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge University Press.
Dafouz, E., & Smit, U. (2016). Towards a dynamic conceptual framework for English-medium educaton in multilingual university settings. Applied Linguistics, 37(3), 397–415.
(2017). A sociolinguistic examination of the multifaceted roles of English in English-medium education in multilingual university settings. In A. Llinares & T. Morton (Eds.), Applied linguistics perspectives on CLIL (pp. 287–306). John Benjamins.
De Costa, P. I., Park, J. S., & Wee, L. (2019). Linguistic entrepreneurship as affective regime: Organizations, audit culture, and second/foreign language education policy. Language Policy, 18(3), 387–406.
Dearden, J. (2014). English as a medium of instruction – a growing global phenomenon. British Council. [URL]
Dimova, S., & Kling, J. (Eds.). (2020). Integrating content and language in multilingual universities. Springer.
Ekoç, A. (2020). English medium instruction (EMI) from the perspectives of students at a technical university in Turkey. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(2), 231–243.
Evans, S., & Green, C. (2007). Why EAP is necessary: A survey of Hong Kong tertiary students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(1), 3–17.
Galloway, N., Kriukow, J., & Numajiri, T. (2017). Internationalisation, higher education and the growing demand for English: An investigation into the English medium of instruction (EMI) movement in China and Japan. ELT Research Papers 17.2. British Council. [URL]
Galloway, N., Numajiri, T., & Rees, N. (2020). The ‘internationalisation’, or ‘Englishisation’, of higher education in East Asia. Higher Education, 1–20. Advance online publication.
Galloway, N., & Ruegg, R. (2020). The provision of student support on English medium instruction programmes in Japan and China. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 451, 1–14. 100846.
Günay, D., & Günay, A. (2011). 1933 ‘den Günümüze Türk Yükseköğretiminde Niceliksel Gelişmeler [Quantitative developments in Turkish higher education since 1933]. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 1(1), 1–22.
Hellekjær, G. (2010). Lecture comprehension in English-medium higher education. HERMES – Journal of Language and Communication in Business, 23(45), 11–34.
Hu, G., & Lei, J. (2014). English-medium instruction in Chinese higher education: A case study. Higher Education, 67(5), 551–567.
Hu, G., Li, L., & Lei, J. (2014). English-medium instruction at a Chinese University: Rhetoric and reality. Language Policy, 13(1), 21–40.
Jiang, L., Zhang, L. J., & May, S. (2019). Implementing English medium instruction (EMI) in China: Teachers’ practices and perceptions, and students’ learning motivation and needs. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(2), 107–119.
Johnson, D. C. (2011). Critical discourse analysis and the ethnography of language policy. Critical Discourse Studies, 8(4), 267–279.
Kırkgöz, Y. (2009). Students’ and lecturers’ perceptions of the effectiveness of foreign language instruction in an English-medium university in Turkey. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(1), 81–93.
(2014). Students’ perceptions of English language versus Turkish language used as the medium of instruction in higher education in Turkey. Turkish Studies, 9(12), 443–459.
Kirkpatrick, A. (2014). The language(s) of HE: EMI and/or ELF and/or multilingualism? Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 4–15.
Kuckartz, U. (2014). Three basic methods of qualitative text analysis. In U. Kuckartz (Ed.), Qualitative text analysis: A guide to methods, practice & using software (pp. 65–120). SAGE.
Lei, J., & Hu, G. (2014). Is English-medium instruction effective in improving Chinese undergraduate students’ English competence? Iral-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 52(2), 99–126.
Liddicoat, A. J., & Taylor-Leech, K. (2015). Multilingual education: The role of language ideologies and attitudes. Current Issues in Language Planning, 16(1), 1–7.
Macaro, E. (2018). English medium instruction: Content and language in policy and practice. Oxford University Press.
Macaro, E., Curle, S., Pun, J., An, J., & Dearden, J. (2018). A systematic review of English medium instruction in higher education. Language Teaching, 51(1), 36–76.
Moncada-Comas, B., & Block, D. (2019). CLIL-ised EMI in practice: Issues arising. The Language Learning Journal, 1–13. Advance online publication.
Ortega, L. (2019). SLA and the study of equitable multilingualism. The Modern Language Journal, 1031, 23–38.
Ricento, T. K., & Hornberger, N. H. (1996). Unpeeling the onion: Language planning and policy and the ELT professional. TESOL Quarterly, 30(3), 401–427.
Rose, H., Curle, S., Aizawa, I., & Thompson, G. (2019). What drives success in English medium taught courses? The interplay between language proficiency, academic skills, and motivation. Studies in Higher Education, 45(11), 2149–2161.
Rose, H., & McKinley, J. (2018). Japan’s English medium instruction initiatives and the globalization of higher education. Higher Education, 75(1), 111–129.
Sahan, K. (2020a). ELF interactions in English-medium engineering classrooms. ELT Journal, 1–10. Advance online publication.
(2020b). Variations of English-medium instruction: Comparing policy and practice in Turkish higher education [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Oxford, UK.
Selvi, A. F. (2014). The medium-of-instruction debate in Turkey: Oscillating between national ideas and bilingual ideals. Current Issues in Language Planning, 15(2), 133–152.
Sert, N. (2008). The language of instruction dilemma in the Turkish context. System, 36(2), 156–171.
Taguchi, N. (2014). English-medium education in the global society. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 52(2), 89–98.
Tsui, A. B. M. (1985). Analysing input and interaction in second language classrooms. RELC Journal, 16(1), 8–32.
Wächter, B., & Maiworm, F. (2015). English-taught programmes in European higher education: The state of play in 2014. Lemmens. [URL]
Cited by (7)
Cited by seven other publications
Kir, Furkan Sevket
Yuksel, Dogan, Marion Nao, Peter Wingrove, Beatrice Zuaro & Anna Kristina Hultgren
Huang, Yi-Hsuan Irene
McKinley, Jim, Kari Sahan, Sihan Zhou & Heath Rose
Yuksel, Dogan & Mehmet Altay
2024. Perspectives of business stakeholders about EMI in Turkiye. Journal of English-Medium Instruction 3:1 ► pp. 48 ff.
ÇALIKOĞLU, Alper
Ismailov, Murod, Thomas K. F. Chiu, Julie Dearden, Yukiko Yamamoto & Nigora Djalilova
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
